On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Simon Perreault <simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca> wrote: > On 2012-05-15 19:01, Tom Hill wrote: >> >> On 15/05/12 18:00, Randy Bush wrote: >>> >>> i run a raw asterisk and would not wish it on my worst enemy. >> >> >> I've been itching to try Freeswitch > > > I know FreeSWITCH and Asterisk from the inside out because we ported both of > them to IPv6. > > Verdict: > > - Asterisk started ugly but is getting much better very quickly. They > actually have paid professional coders working on it, and it shows. They > started participating in the IETF. They recently implemented ICE. They're on > the right track. > > - FreeSWITCH started much prettier by reusing third-party libraries. But the > glue code around these libs is absolutely horrendous. That glue code keeps > growing and getting uglier. Their level of clue is dropping. > > Right now, I'd pick Asterisk over FreeSWITCH. > > Simon > -- > DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca > NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca > STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca >
Thanks Simon, I was about to say something. Users that have a hard time with Asterisk do not understand it. -- ~ Andrew "lathama" Latham lath...@gmail.com http://lathama.net ~
