On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 02:42:27 -0700, Rens wrote:
Could anybody recommend any hardware that can build a VPN that works well
over satellite connections? (TCP enhancements)
I'd try splitting the solution into two devices: at the lower layer, the
tunneling part, which can be done with any traditio
Hey Tim, thanks a lot. This did help. I saw how you dealt with some
queries and stuff. Thanks again!
On 7 May 2012 16:44, Tim Jackson wrote:
> Dunno how much help it'll be but here's mine.. It's basic and probably
> non-RFC compliant, but it might help.
>
> crapbox.idge.net/~tjackson/rwhois.t
Hello All,
Looking to deploying 3 x N2K-C2248TP-1GE (2ps 1fan) 4 x10GE slot and 48
x 10/100/1000, Rather than a 6509. I'm hesitant with those is the
maintenance aspect. While ISSUs don't necessarily impact the 2248, EPLD
upgrades would. Do you know how upgrades are implemented on the 2248s?
Look at the route to 87.121.83.25. It looks like that's the address of
your provider's PE router. It is most likely not in your IGP and hence
does not have a FEC. You should set next-hop self on the router that peers
with your ISP. Also, I might be missing something but I don't usually set
next
Dear Keegan,
Thank you for your advice!
Here is the output of my configuration and applied debug commands:
# PE router config:
The session bellow is between PE and CE:
router bgp 34224
!
address-family ipv4 vrf DEF
redistribute connected
redistribute static
neighbor 10.18.7.1 remote-as
What is the next hop of the route? There should be an IGP route for
the next hop in the iBGP default. It should have a label or LSP
attached to it. How was the default generated? Does it come from a
provider? If so you may have to set next hop self on the router that
receives the default. You
Around 05/08/2012 08:23 AM, Sébastien Riccio scribbled:
> Maybe you can temporary fix the issue adding mail-gy0-f174.google.com to
> your /etc/hosts file ?
I just relaxed HELO checking for now but adding it to /etc/hosts is a good
idea.
--
Georgi Chorbadzhiyski
http://georgi.unixsol.org/
Dear Members,
We are ISP which use the same autonomous system to hold External BGP
sessions
and for implementing L3VPN MPLS ( as internal BGP )
We have a internal office router that receives a "default route" via IBGP
from our border router.
I'll try to briefly explain the problem:
This inte
9 matches
Mail list logo
