Dear Keegan,
Thank you for your advice!
Here is the output of my configuration and applied debug commands:
# PE router config:
The session bellow is between PE and CE:
router bgp 34224
!
address-family ipv4 vrf DEF
redistribute connected
redistribute static
neighbor 10.18.7.1 remote-as 34224
neighbor 10.18.7.1 description to_echo-sdc_CE
neighbor 10.18.7.1 activate
neighbor 10.18.7.1 send-community both
neighbor 10.18.7.1 prefix-list Permit_Default in
neighbor 10.18.7.1 route-map NEXT-HOP-SELF in
neighbor 10.18.7.1 route-map NEXT-HOP-SELF out
no synchronization
exit-address-family
end
Hotel-st_PE#show route-map NEXT-HOP-SELF
route-map NEXT-HOP-SELF, permit, sequence 10
Match clauses:
Set clauses:
ip next-hop peer-address
Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
Hotel-st_PE#show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf DEF summary
Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down
State/PfxRcd
10.18.7.1 4 34224 85 38 894079 0 0 00:00:02 1
Hotel-st_PE#show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf DEF neighbors 10.18.7.1 routes
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
Route Distinguisher: 34224:151 (default for vrf DEF)
*>i0.0.0.0 10.18.7.1 0 120 0 i
Hotel-st_PE#show ip route vrf DEF
23.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
S 23.23.23.23 [1/0] via 10.18.7.1
24.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 24.24.24.24 is directly connected, Loopback30
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
B 10.100.187.1/32 [200/0] via 10.1.7.253, 00:16:16
C 10.18.7.0/29 is directly connected, Vlan187
B* 0.0.0.0/0 [200/0] via 10.18.7.1, 00:08:40
#### Bravo-plv is other test PE router which should receive and use
"default route"
bravo-plv_PE#show ip route vrf DEF
23.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
B 23.23.23.23 [200/0] via 10.1.1.253, 1w5d
24.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
B 24.24.24.24 [200/0] via 10.1.1.253, 2w0d
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 10.100.187.1/32 is directly connected, Loopback100
B 10.18.7.0/29 [200/0] via 10.1.1.253, 1w6d
B* 0.0.0.0/0 [200/0] via 10.18.7.1, 00:02:37
### this ping is OK because 10.18.7.0/29 is connected on the PE router.
bravo-plv_PE#ping vrf DEF 10.18.7.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.18.7.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/4/4 ms
### 212.73.140.140.190 isn't in routing table. It is direct connected
network on
interface on CE and passing via "default route"
bravo-plv_PE#ping vrf DEF 212.73.140.190
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 212.73.140.190, timeout is 2 seconds:
.....
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
This is very strange:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
## this output showing that the router not set MPLS label for 0.0.0.0/0
Only for static and the connected networks.
bravo-plv_PE#show ip cef vrf DEF 10.18.7.0/29
10.18.7.0/29
nexthop 10.1.7.1 Vlan15 label 76 43
bravo-plv_PE#show ip cef vrf DEF 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0
recursive via 87.121.83.25 unusable: no label
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Best~
--
---
*Javor Kliachev*
IP engineer
Neterra Ltd.
Telephone: +359 2 975 16 16
Fax: +359 2 975 34 36
Mobile: +359 885 988 495
www.neterra.net <http://www.neterra.net>
