In article <4ee6e7d2.8060...@bogus.com>, Joel jaeggli
writes
So now we will reap the consequences and it will be at the cost of
new market entrants (which I am sure will please some people) and
perhaps cold hard cash for those who cannot expand their business or
have to 'buy' address space.
Ne
I've had similar experiences to Mr. Petach.
Depending on order of operations, you can look at this from a
different prospective as well -- why go with a soulless entity for
your transit (or transport, collocation, ...) requirements, when you
can "keep it in the family" and engage a peer who alread
I haven't done wireless in downtown palo alto, only metro-e however.
Given your proximity to 345 hamilton (under 1000 feet most likely) I
would think at&t would be in a position to offer fairly high-rate dsl,
On 12/16/11 10:24 , Darren Bolding wrote:
> Apologies if this is not the most appropriat
On 12/17/11 00:14 , Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Friday, December 16, 2011 05:02:33 AM Joe Malcolm wrote:
>
>> Once upon a time, UUNET did the opposite by setting
>> origin to unknown for peer routes, in an attempt to
>> prefer customer routes over peer routes. We moved to
>> local preference shortly th
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Friday, December 16, 2011 05:02:33 AM Joe Malcolm wrote:
>
>> Once upon a time, UUNET did the opposite by setting
>> origin to unknown for peer routes, in an attempt to
>> prefer customer routes over peer routes. We moved to
>> local prefere
On Friday, December 16, 2011 05:02:33 AM Joe Malcolm wrote:
> Once upon a time, UUNET did the opposite by setting
> origin to unknown for peer routes, in an attempt to
> prefer customer routes over peer routes. We moved to
> local preference shortly thereafter as it became clear
> this was "changi
6 matches
Mail list logo
