> So far the IPv6 party's been pretty small due to the expense of the
> rocket ship upgrades required to reach the planet that party is going
> to be held on.
for those of us who have been here on B-612 nuturing the rose for over
a decade, you 'adult' geographers seem to live on a very grey and
de
On 12/10/11 21:42 , Joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 12/10/11 17:48 , Barry Shein wrote:
>>
I just had a personal email from a brand new ISP in the Asia-Pacific
area desperately looking for enough IPv4 to be able to run their
business the way they would like?
>>
>> This sniping elicited by t
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Philip Dorr wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> mocking someone who shows up when the party is already over is not
>> overly kind or useful. making clear to the world that the part is over
> The party is not over, it is just moving fr
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> No Barry, I respectfully disagree. It's almost 2012. The first
>> predictions of IPv4 exhaustion were made *last century*. We've been
>> predicting it to the month level for like 5 years now. Any business
>> that is making business plans an
On 12/10/11 17:48 , Barry Shein wrote:
>
>>> I just had a personal email from a brand new ISP in the Asia-Pacific
>>> area desperately looking for enough IPv4 to be able to run their
>>> business the way they would like?
>
> This sniping elicited by the above seems inappropriate and
> unprofessio
> No Barry, I respectfully disagree. It's almost 2012. The first
> predictions of IPv4 exhaustion were made *last century*. We've been
> predicting it to the month level for like 5 years now. Any business
> that is making business plans and models that doesn't take "we may not
> get IPv4 space"
>>> I just had a personal email from a brand new ISP in the Asia-Pacific
>>> area desperately looking for enough IPv4 to be able to run their
>>> business the way they would like?
>
> This sniping elicited by the above seems inappropriate and
> unprofessional, the request/anecdote seemed reasonabl
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 20:48:45 EST, Barry Shein said:
> >> I just had a personal email from a brand new ISP in the Asia-Pacific
> >> area desperately looking for enough IPv4 to be able to run their
> >> business the way they would like?
>
> This sniping elicited by the above seems inappropriate and
>
>> I just had a personal email from a brand new ISP in the Asia-Pacific
>> area desperately looking for enough IPv4 to be able to run their
>> business the way they would like?
This sniping elicited by the above seems inappropriate and
unprofessional, the request/anecdote seemed reasonable and co
Disable your firewall and run TCPDump on your host when you try to ping
it.
Does the ICMP packet get to your host?
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> Am 10.12.2011 um 20:49 schrieb NetSecGuy:
>
> > This does not work from FIOS:
> >
> > traceroute to 106.187.34.33 (106.187.34
Am 10.12.2011 um 20:49 schrieb NetSecGuy:
> This does not work from FIOS:
>
> traceroute to 106.187.34.33 (106.187.34.33), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
>
> 4 so-6-1-0-0.phil-bb-rtr2.verizon-gni.net (130.81.199.4) 34.229 ms
> 8.743 ms 8.878 ms
> 5 so-8-0-0-0.lcc1-res-bb-rtr1-re1.verizon-gni.n
Do you have a firewall running on the Linode VPS? Any chance something
like fail2ban blocked your IP for too many invalid logins? Are you able
to ping your FIOS IP from the VPS? Try doing a traceroute on the VPS to
your FIOS IP. Perhaps there is some issue getting back to you. Based on
the trac
I have a Linode VPS in Japan that I can't access from Verizon FIOS,
but can access from other locations. I'm not sure who to blame.
The host, 106.187.34.33, is behind the gateway 106.187.34.1:
>From FIOS to 106.187.34.1 (this works).
traceroute to 106.187.34.1 (106.187.34.1), 64 hops max, 52 b
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:17:32AM -0500, Keegan Holley wrote:
> 2011/12/10
>
> > On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 03:15:01AM -0500, Keegan Holley wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > > On Dec 10, 2011, at 2:58 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> > >
> > > >> I just had a personal email from a bran
2011/12/10
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 03:15:01AM -0500, Keegan Holley wrote:
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On Dec 10, 2011, at 2:58 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> >
> > >> I just had a personal email from a brand new ISP in the Asia-Pacific
> > >> area desperately looking for enough IPv4 to be
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 03:15:01AM -0500, Keegan Holley wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 10, 2011, at 2:58 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> >> I just had a personal email from a brand new ISP in the Asia-Pacific
> >> area desperately looking for enough IPv4 to be able to run their
> >> bus
Hi
anyone have a contact of a local telco for buy a link in metro of the
Singapore City ?
We want connect a customer based at singapore to our rack of Equinix or *
I-Advantage
Thanks for your help
best regards
Olivier
*
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 10, 2011, at 2:58 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> I just had a personal email from a brand new ISP in the Asia-Pacific
>> area desperately looking for enough IPv4 to be able to run their
>> business the way they would like…
>
> and we are supposed to be surprised or feel s
18 matches
Mail list logo
