On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
> Tried that. I agree with others that it is an NDP issue. NDP for the GUA is
> fine, but just not for the link local. Is there something that would block
> only link local by default?
>
> I should add that I have another uplink to a differ
See subject. Contact me off-list please.
Matthew Kaufman
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Michael Painter wrote:
> Sean's apology for their 'mistake' rings hollow.
> They've had almost 4 months to implement a solution to rectify these
> 'mistakes', but chose to ignore it until the uproar caused by the nmap
[snip]
I would say it doesn't read 'unhollow'
Kyle Duren wrote:
http://download.cnet.com/8301-2007_4-57338809-12/a-note-from-sean-regarding-the-download.com-installer/
In case no one saw this yet.
-Kyle
Sean's apology for their 'mistake' rings hollow.
They've had almost 4 months to implement a solution to rectify these 'mistakes', but ch
http://download.cnet.com/8301-2007_4-57338809-12/a-note-from-sean-regarding-the-download.com-installer/
In case no one saw this yet.
-Kyle
Hi!
Using LFT:
root@debian:~# lft 8.8.8.8
traceroute to 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 172.28.1.1 (172.28.1.1) 0.798 ms 0.711 ms
2 10.16.0.2 (10.16.0.2) 0.414 ms 0.331 ms
3 41.200.16.1 (41.200.16.1) 11.400 ms 11.474 ms
4 172.17.2.25 (172.17.2.25) 10.184 ms 11.322 m
, please let me know :)
i never saw that befaure
Meftah Tayeb
IT Consulting
http://www.tmvoip.com/
phone: +21321656139
Mobile: +213660347746
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 6695 (20111208) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Anti
; 12 100 ms 100 ms 102 ms inet-crli1.qrli1.buh.ew.ro [81.24.28.226]
>>> 1381 ms81 ms81 ms 193.231.72.10
>>> 1492 ms92 ms93 ms ip4-89-238-225-90.euroweb.ro [89.238.225.90]
>>> 1589 ms89 ms89 ms webrri.rri.ro.72.231.193.in-add
74 ms ae-1-12.bar1.budapest1.level3.net
>>> [4.69.141.249]
>>> 1063 ms63 ms79 ms euroweb-gw.ip4.tinet.net [77.67.66.154]
>>> 1185 ms84 ms84 ms v15-core1.stsisp.ro [193.151.28.1]
>>> 12 100 ms 100 ms 102 ms inet-crli1.qrli
t;> 2.52]
>> Itinéraire déterminé.
>> C:\Documents and Settings\TAYEB>
>> Seabone, then level3, then Tinet, then level3, then tinet ?
>> if is that a routing stufs that i don't know, please let me know :)
>> i never saw that befaure
>>
>> Meftah Tayeb
>> IT Consulting
>> http://www.tmvoip.com/
>> phone: +21321656139
>> Mobile: +213660347746
>>
>>
>> __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
>> database 6695 (20111208) __
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>
>
n Tinet, then level3, then tinet ?
if is that a routing stufs that i don't know, please let me know :)
i never saw that befaure
Meftah Tayeb
IT Consulting
http://www.tmvoip.com/
phone: +21321656139
Mobile: +213660347746
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, ver
.225.90]
>> 1589 ms89 ms89 ms webrri.rri.ro.72.231.193.in-addr.arpa
>> [193.231.7
>> 2.52]
>> Itinéraire déterminé.
>> C:\Documents and Settings\TAYEB>
>> Seabone, then level3, then Tinet, then level3, then tinet ?
>>
voip.com/
phone: +21321656139
Mobile: +213660347746
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 6695 (20111208) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versi
> Seabone, then level3, then Tinet, then level3, then tinet ?
> if is that a routing stufs that i don't know, please let me know :)
> i never saw that befaure
>
>Meftah Tayeb
> IT Consulting
> http://www.tmvoip.com/
> phone: +21321656139
> Mobile: +213660
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 6695 (20111208) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
--
ricky
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6695 (20111
;
> Seabone, then level3, then Tinet, then level3, then tinet ?
> if is that a routing stufs that i don't know, please let me know :)
> i never saw that befaure
>
> Meftah Tayeb
> IT Consulting
> http://www.tmvoip.com/
> phone: +21321656139
> Mobile:
rus signature
database 6695 (20111208) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
Fyodor wrote:
> switched their Nmap downloads back to our real installer. At least
> for now. But that isn't enough--they are still infecting the
> installers for thousands of other packages!
I am sorry about these problems, it is unacceptable.
Sourceforge, at least a year or 2 ago, did somet
Dear NANOG Community,
On behalf of the Board of Directors, I am happy to share some wonderful
news regarding hotel accommodations for our NANOG 54 meeting in San Diego.
The hotel has been undergoing renovations and recently completed remodeling
of all its guest rooms and meeting space. The last ph
The interface finally stabalised.
This after performing segment by segment loop tests at SDH level.
We found errors which were sorted after which the service has been better
the random flaps have since disappeared.
Now dealing with random BGP cease notifications I receive from my upstream.
Thank
I wouldn't do it. We have 8 x PA-2050s and run into a lot of wierd bugs
(just doing web filtering)
David
Sent from an email server.
On Dec 7, 2011, at 12:31 PM, "Gregory Croft" wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Does anyone have any experience with using firewalls as edge devices
> when BGP is
Roland,
While I understand that the definition has nothing to do with IT
Security there is no question that many folks use the phrase to
summarize a layered IT security model.
Edge routers with ACLs to filter white noise go to edge L3/4 firewalls
to filter their layer go to load balancers
Fyodor wrote:
switched their Nmap downloads back to our real installer. At least
for now. But that isn't enough--they are still infecting the
installers for thousands of other packages!
I am sorry about these problems, it is unacceptable.
Sourceforge, at least a year or 2 ago, did somethin
23 matches
Mail list logo
