Hai! Check with lft or mtr ...
Thanks, Raymond Dijkxhoorn, Prolocation Op 7 dec. 2011 om 20:56 heeft "Meftah Tayeb" <tayeb.mef...@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven: > please tel me how to ? > i don't know astraceroute:) > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven Bellovin" <s...@cs.columbia.edu> > To: "Meftah Tayeb" <tayeb.mef...@gmail.com> > Cc: "Fred Baker" <f...@cisco.com>; <nanog@nanog.org> > Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 11:33 PM > Subject: Re: Traceroute explanation > > > On Dec 7, 2011, at 2:51 08PM, Meftah Tayeb wrote: > >> big thank for that >> but, i am testing that for one day :) > > > > Can you do an AStraceroute or manually translate those addresses into AS#s? > That is, might level3 and tinet be using multiple AS#s, in which case this > isn't unreasonable? > > > > > >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fred Baker" <f...@cisco.com> >> To: "Meftah Tayeb" <tayeb.mef...@gmail.com> >> Cc: <nanog@nanog.org> >> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 11:23 PM >> Subject: Re: Traceroute explanation >> >> >> This is just a guess, but I'll bet the route changed while you were >> measuring it. >> >> Traceroute sends a request, awaits a response, sends a request, ... Suppose >> that the route was >> >> 172.28.0.1 -> 10.16.0.2 >> -> 41.200.16.1 >> -> 172.17.2.25 >> -> 213.140.58.10 >> -> 195.22.195.125 >> -> 4.69.151.13 >> -> 213.200.68.61 >> -> somewhere else >> >> and after the test got that far, two systems got inserted into the path >> before level3, resulting in the route entering level3 at a different point, >> 4.69.141.249. What you now have is >> >> 172.28.0.1 -> 10.16.0.2 >> -> 41.200.16.1 >> -> 172.17.2.25 >> -> 213.140.58.10 >> -> 195.22.195.125 >> -> unknown >> -> unknown >> -> 4.69.141.249 >> -> 77.67.66.154 >> -> and so on >> >> The effect would be to get a result like this. >> >> Next time you see something like this, suggestion: repeat the traceroute and >> see what you get. >> >> >> On Dec 7, 2011, at 12:12 PM, Meftah Tayeb wrote: >> >>> Hey folks, >>> i see a strange traceroute there >>> >>> Détermination de l'itinéraire vers www.rri.ro [193.231.72.52] >>> avec un maximum de 30 sauts : >>> >>> 1 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms 172.28.0.1 >>> 2 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms localhost [10.16.0.2] >>> 3 10 ms 10 ms 13 ms 41.200.16.1 >>> 4 11 ms 10 ms 11 ms 172.17.2.25 >>> 5 21 ms 21 ms 21 ms 213.140.58.10 >>> 6 34 ms 31 ms 55 ms pos14-0.palermo9.pal.seabone.net >>> [195.22.197.125 >>> ] >>> 7 34 ms 33 ms 35 ms ae-5-6.bar2.marseille1.level3.net >>> [4.69.151.13] >>> 8 106 ms 68 ms 67 ms xe-1-1-0.mil10.ip4.tinet.net [213.200.68.61] >>> 9 74 ms 73 ms 74 ms ae-1-12.bar1.budapest1.level3.net >>> [4.69.141.249] >>> 10 63 ms 63 ms 79 ms euroweb-gw.ip4.tinet.net [77.67.66.154] >>> 11 85 ms 84 ms 84 ms v15-core1.stsisp.ro [193.151.28.1] >>> 12 100 ms 100 ms 102 ms inet-crli1.qrli1.buh.ew.ro [81.24.28.226] >>> 13 81 ms 81 ms 81 ms 193.231.72.10 >>> 14 92 ms 92 ms 93 ms ip4-89-238-225-90.euroweb.ro [89.238.225.90] >>> 15 89 ms 89 ms 89 ms webrri.rri.ro.72.231.193.in-addr.arpa >>> [193.231.7 >>> 2.52] >>> Itinéraire déterminé. >>> C:\Documents and Settings\TAYEB> >>> Seabone, then level3, then Tinet, then level3, then tinet ? >>> if is that a routing stufs that i don't know, please let me know :) >>> i never saw that befaure >>> >>> Meftah Tayeb >>> IT Consulting >>> http://www.tmvoip.com/ >>> phone: +21321656139 >>> Mobile: +213660347746 >>> >>> >>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus >>> signature database 6695 (20111208) __________ >>> >>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >>> >>> http://www.eset.com >>> >> >> >> >> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature >> database 6695 (20111208) __________ >> >> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >> >> http://www.eset.com >> >> >> >> >> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature >> database 6695 (20111208) __________ >> >> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >> >> http://www.eset.com >> >> >> >> >> > > > --Steve Bellovin, https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb > > > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature > database 6695 (20111208) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature > database 6695 (20111208) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > >
