reporting Swiss Money Report?

The notorious fax spammer (Swiss Money Report, European Money Report, etc; Altanus Ltd.) is currently residing in 91.223.119/24 (91.223.119.174), which is registered to Traian Zoran Tariceanu, First Media Service Ltd. The contacts at @fmsss.info bounce. What is the proper channel for reporting th

Re: Interested in input on tunnels as an IPv6 transition technology

In message <03a401cc1197$0ceec410$26cc4c30$@net>, "Tony Hain" writes: > 6rd > designed as a derivative of 6to4 to explicitly remove the /16 = > restriction in IPv6 BGP advertisements because changing that one line = > would have taken longer to get agreement on than an entirely new design, = > imp

RE: Yahoo and IPv6

> -Original Message- > From: Matthew Kaufman [mailto:matt...@matthew.at] > Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 8:56 PM > To: Owen DeLong > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: Yahoo and IPv6 > > On 5/15/2011 7:08 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: > > On May 15, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote: > > > >

Re: Yahoo and IPv6

On 5/15/2011 7:08 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: On May 15, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote: ...and we'll agree to disagree on this one (RTMFP)... and users will just be ok with BitTorrent and Skype not working on the v6-only + NAT64 networks you're building, I suppose? Matthew Kaufman Uh,

Re: Yahoo and IPv6

On May 15, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote: > On 5/15/2011 6:49 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote: >> >> >> On May 14, 2011 9:30 PM, "Matthew Kaufman" > > wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > Sure, but NAT64 doesn't let SIP phones on an IPv6-only network talk to SIP >> > phones o

Re: Yahoo and IPv6

> e have agreed to disagree on the value of this before. Sorry your not so > popular protocol is going the way of EGP it's just not fit for the > evolving internet and will be subject to natural deselction. I am sure you > will disagree with that and insist every end user must always support

Re: GoDaddy abuse contact

On 5/15/2011 4:27 PM, Tammy A Wisdom wrote: > Trying to get them to do anything is a waste of time. They refuse to enforce > their TOS and will tell you that if you call. > Tammy of the AHBL > > > Sent from my iPhone Yep, Godaddy abuse = big dark nothing into which complaints enter... and then are

Re: GoDaddy abuse contact

Trying to get them to do anything is a waste of time. They refuse to enforce their TOS and will tell you that if you call. Tammy of the AHBL Sent from my iPhone On May 15, 2011, at 14:11, Alex Brooks wrote: > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Chris wrote: >> Does anyone have a better abuse co

Re: GoDaddy abuse contact

On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Chris wrote: > Does anyone have a better abuse contact for GoDaddy? I'm trying to get > one of those "paste Javascript in your browser address bar" scams on > Facebook shutdown before too many idiots fall for it. The only way I've ever got a response from them is

GoDaddy abuse contact

Does anyone have a better abuse contact for GoDaddy? I'm trying to get one of those "paste Javascript in your browser address bar" scams on Facebook shutdown before too many idiots fall for it. -- --C "The dumber people think you are, the more surprised they're going to be when you kill them."

Re: Yahoo and IPv6

On 15 mei 2011, at 20:03, Jima wrote: BitTorrent tends to be an evolving protocol, with lots of clients competing for mindshare; I'm not certain that limitation will remain. Two years ago the Pirate Bay got on IPv6 in a way that was incompatible with existing clients that were IP version ag

Re: Yahoo and IPv6

On 15 mei 2011, at 6:29, Matthew Kaufman wrote: And that would be the fault of NAT64, which for all of the applications I mentioned (and more) made the seriously wrong assumption that every IPv4 address is looked up in a DNS server. This brings to mind the story of the physicist (but it cou

Re: Yahoo and IPv6

On 2011-05-15 10:28, Matthew Kaufman wrote: On 5/15/2011 6:49 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote: We have agreed to disagree on the value of this before. Sorry your not so popular protocol is going the way of EGP it's just not fit for the evolving internet and will be subject to natural deselction. I

Re: Backbone operators see IPv6 connectivity demand up, but little traffic

You've got to get your backbone and transit enabled instrumented and stable before you put customers on it... that's a key in transitioning from an experiemental toy to something that you can actually use. The current V6 deployement that I'm working on mirrors the previous 4 almost exactly in t

Re: Yahoo and IPv6

On May 15, 2011 8:28 AM, "Matthew Kaufman" wrote: > > On 5/15/2011 6:49 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote: >> >> >> On May 14, 2011 9:30 PM, "Matthew Kaufman" wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > Sure, but NAT64 doesn't let SIP phones on an IPv6-only network talk to SIP phones on an IP4-only network. >> > >> >> Right,

Re: Yahoo and IPv6

On 5/15/2011 6:49 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote: On May 14, 2011 9:30 PM, "Matthew Kaufman" > wrote: > > > Sure, but NAT64 doesn't let SIP phones on an IPv6-only network talk to SIP phones on an IP4-only network. > Right, that is why we have SBC / b2bue for the cases w

Re: Yahoo and IPv6

On May 14, 2011 9:30 PM, "Matthew Kaufman" wrote: > > On 5/14/2011 6:41 PM, Jima wrote: >> >> On 2011-05-14 13:10, Matthew Kaufman wrote: >>> >>> On 5/14/2011 10:19 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote: Ipv6-only is a highly functional reality when enabled with nat64/dns64, there are several emp

Re: Yahoo and IPv6

When the RIAA and friends in congress and international chapter affiliates make it illegal to share a network address. Sorry that is when we turn them back on!! Christian de Larrinaga On 14 May 2011, at 19:27, "John Levine" wrote: >> I think that the real question is, when will people who

Backbone operators see IPv6 connectivity demand up, but little traffic

http://searchtelecom.techtarget.com/news/2240035722/Backbone-operators-see-IPv6-connectivity-demand-up-but-little-traffic Backbone operators see IPv6 connectivity demand up, but little traffic Internet backbone and wholesale carriers are anecdotally reporting a rapid rise in demand from their se