On 4/7/11 8:30 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> Otherwise some kind of routing must be implemented on hosts.
Some kind of routing is already implemented on hosts.
>>> honto???
>> your mobile phone is multihomed, as is this laptop I'm typing on.
>
> routing != multihomed
it's not an autonomous sys
Otherwise some kind of routing must be implemented on hosts.
>>> Some kind of routing is already implemented on hosts.
>> honto???
> your mobile phone is multihomed, as is this laptop I'm typing on.
routing != multihomed
try rfc 1812
randy
On 4/7/11 8:13 PM, Tom Limoncelli wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> There is no need for NAT in order to multiple-home. BGP is every bit as
>> effective and much simpler.
>>
>
> I know a lot of small businesses with one FiOS link and one Comcast
> link and I don't t
On 4/7/11 7:53 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> Otherwise some kind of routing must be implemented on hosts.
>> Some kind of routing is already implemented on hosts.
>
> honto???
>
your mobile phone is multihomed, as is this laptop I'm typing on.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> There is no need for NAT in order to multiple-home. BGP is every bit as
> effective and much simpler.
>
I know a lot of small businesses with one FiOS link and one Comcast
link and I don't think they're going to be able to do BGP. Their
provi
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Baugher [mailto:ja...@thebaughers.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 3:15 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Bubba is a 75 year old woman looking to make some extra
> cash
>
> We had someone come into a cell site and strip out all the outside
>
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 7, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
>
> Michel de Nostredame wrote on 07/04/2011 22:30:
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Daniel STICKNEY
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm investigating how to setup multihoming for IPv6 over two DSL lines
>>> (different ISPs)
>> Otherwise some kind of routing must be implemented on hosts.
> Some kind of routing is already implemented on hosts.
honto???
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Jason Baugher wrote:
We had someone come into a cell site and strip out all the outside ground
leads. Oddly enough they left the ground bars themselves, which would have
been much more worthwhile. Maybe they came unprepared and only had clippers.
Every once in awhile there
On 4/7/2011 2:16 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Apr 7, 2011, at 1:54 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Babushkas can be quite mean, though mostly it's shopping bags that are their
preferred tools of assault. ;-)
As the recipient of a number of umbrella tips while trying to catch up to my
fiancee (at th
On 2011-04-07, at 17:07, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
> Otherwise some kind of routing must be implemented on hosts.
Some kind of routing is already implemented on hosts.
Joe
In message <4d9e27a5.3040...@forthnet.gr>, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou writes:
>
> Michel de Nostredame wrote on 07/04/2011 22:30:
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Daniel STICKNEY wr
> ote:
> >
> >> I'm investigating how to setup multihoming for IPv6 over two DSL lines
> >> (different ISPs),
- Original Message -
> From: "Valdis Kletnieks"
> On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:23:12 PDT, Jeroen van Aart said:
> > Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
> > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/
> >
> > That RFC is the opposite of funny (to me). Just because rfc1149 is
> > funny
> > that doesn
We had someone come into a cell site and strip out all the outside
ground leads. Oddly enough they left the ground bars themselves, which
would have been much more worthwhile. Maybe they came unprepared and
only had clippers.
Also, several years ago a building in our area was being renovated,
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Michael Thomas wrote:
On 04/07/2011 11:54 AM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
This is common in the Netherlands too nowadays and other countries too I
am sure. Because copper has gone up in price considerably. In the
Netherlands especially copper lines along railroad tracks are re
Michel de Nostredame wrote on 07/04/2011 22:30:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Daniel STICKNEY wrote:
I'm investigating how to setup multihoming for IPv6 over two DSL lines
(different ISPs), and I wanted to see if this wheel has already been
invented. Has anyone already set this up or tes
In a message written on Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 03:39:03PM -0400, Scott Brim wrote:
> You need to specify "tail drop" behavior.
It may be a Eurasian Hobby to make such silly statements, but to
me it just seems like an Imperial Shag, and a waste of everyone's
time.
A Brown Kiwi once told me that the
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 19:30:39 BST, Martin List-Petersen said:
Ah well, you'd better have a LOT of storage space for your mailbox, if
you subscribe to that :)
Odd. I get more traffic on NANOG than on Outages. Now if you want
a firehose list, go read linux-kernel
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 15:35, wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:23:12 PDT, Jeroen van Aart said:
> > Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
> > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/
> >
> > That RFC is the opposite of funny (to me). Just because rfc1149 is funny
> > that doesn't mean that repetition
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:23:12 PDT, Jeroen van Aart said:
> Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/
>
> That RFC is the opposite of funny (to me). Just because rfc1149 is funny
> that doesn't mean that repetitions of it are funny too. Quite the contrary.
Yes,
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Daniel STICKNEY wrote:
> I'm investigating how to setup multihoming for IPv6 over two DSL lines
> (different ISPs), and I wanted to see if this wheel has already been
> invented. Has anyone already set this up or tested it ?
When you talking about "two DSL lines",
Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/
That RFC is the opposite of funny (to me). Just because rfc1149 is funny
that doesn't mean that repetitions of it are funny too. Quite the contrary.
Greetings,
Jeroen
--
http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
ht
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 7, 2011, at 1:54 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>> http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/06/georgian-woman-cuts-web-access
>
> Babushkas can be quite mean, though mostly it's shopping bags that are their
> preferred tools of assault. ;-
On 04/07/2011 11:54 AM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
This is common in the Netherlands too nowadays and other countries too
I am sure. Because copper has gone up in price considerably. In the
Netherlands especially copper lines along railroad tracks are removed,
disabling alert systems with obvious d
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/06/georgian-woman-cuts-web-access
Babushkas can be quite mean, though mostly it's shopping bags that are
their preferred tools of assault. ;-)
From TA:
"The cable is owned by the Georgian railway network. It is heavily
p
On 4/7/2011 02:27, Daniel STICKNEY wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm investigating how to setup multihoming for IPv6 over two DSL lines
> (different ISPs), and I wanted to see if this wheel has already been
> invented. Has anyone already set this up or tested it ?
>
> In my research into the proposed s
The warning was released at 3:55PM in GMT,
but local news says several number of people is injured again.
Masato
> -Original Message-
> From: andrew.wallace [mailto:andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 8:14 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Tsunami warning fo
A tsunami warning is issued for north-eastern Japan after an earthquake with a
magnitude of 7.4 hits the region.
Andrew
On Apr 7, 2011, at 6:51 AM, Tomas Podermanski wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>all IPv6 multihoming ideas are very theoretical today. None of them
> is ready to use. Shim6 looks very good, but it requires support on both
> a client and a server side. As you can guess, there is only experimental
> support
Hi Daniel,
all IPv6 multihoming ideas are very theoretical today. None of them
is ready to use. Shim6 looks very good, but it requires support on both
a client and a server side. As you can guess, there is only experimental
support for some operating systems. Microsoft and Apple doesn't support
On Apr 7, 2011, at 1:18 AM, Vikas Sharma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How to get link-local address from BIA. I have seen some information
> on Internet but it is not working for all.
>
Pretty simple:
Split the BIA into two 24 bit chunks:
cc000b / fc
Then insert fffe in the middle:
have you thought about taking a Cisco training course?
- Original Message
From: Daniel STICKNEY
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thu, April 7, 2011 10:27:01 AM
Subject: Implementations/suggestions for Multihoming IPv6 for DSL sites
Hello all,
I'm investigating how to setup multihoming for IP
how many ip addresses do you have ?
- Original Message
From: Daniel STICKNEY
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thu, April 7, 2011 10:27:01 AM
Subject: Implementations/suggestions for Multihoming IPv6 for DSL sites
Hello all,
I'm investigating how to setup multihoming for IPv6 over two DSL lin
On 07/04/2011 09:49, Daniel Roesen wrote:
Interesting, as Fou^WBrocade's statement was that this is unfixable due
to a chipset (which is Broadcom) limitation.
I asked them about this exact point, but my SE said it was a software
restriction which was fixed as of 4.2.
Nick
why would you do that for?
- Original Message
From: Daniel STICKNEY
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thu, April 7, 2011 10:27:01 AM
Subject: Implementations/suggestions for Multihoming IPv6 for DSL sites
Hello all,
I'm investigating how to setup multihoming for IPv6 over two DSL lines
(diffe
Hello all,
I'm investigating how to setup multihoming for IPv6 over two DSL lines
(different ISPs), and I wanted to see if this wheel has already been
invented. Has anyone already set this up or tested it ?
In my research into the proposed solutions I came across this document
"IEEE Communicatio
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 07:45:20AM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> >> I.e. a 2-member LAG might load balance equally under ideal conditions,
> >> but a 3-member LAG might naturally load balance 2:2:1.
> >
> > Even newer gear does that. TurboIron 24X for example.
>
> I believe this has been fixed o
Hi,
How to get link-local address from BIA. I have seen some information
on Internet but it is not working for all.
=
The BIA in this case is cc00.0bfc.. The rules for the modified
EUI-64 addressing are:
•FFFE will be put in between the vendor-id (3 most significant bytes)
and th
40 matches
Mail list logo
