On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:23:12 PDT, Jeroen van Aart said: > Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote: > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/ > > That RFC is the opposite of funny (to me). Just because rfc1149 is funny > that doesn't mean that repetitions of it are funny too. Quite the contrary.
Yes, but I bet many providers recognize rfc1149 now. rfc6214 gives us a new brown M&M to put into the contracts...
pgph5Jd4a9Rsr.pgp
Description: PGP signature