Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources

2010-08-03 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 7:40 PM, todd glassey wrote: >  On 8/3/2010 4:07 PM, ML wrote: >> As an SP in the MDU (multi dwelling unit) market we dutifully SWIP >> netblocks for each apartment complex/condo/etc.  Doing such we >> publically publish the physical address an IP lives (sans Apt/Unit #). >>

Fwd: [AusNOG] AusNOG 04 Reminder, 6 weeks to go!

2010-08-03 Thread Mark Prior
FYI. Mark. Original Message Subject: [AusNOG] AusNOG 04 Reminder, 6 weeks to go! Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 19:08:18 +1000 From: Terry Manderson To: aus...@ausnog.net Dear Colleagues, Just reminding you that AusNOG 04 is just 6 weeks away on the 16th and 17th of September at the

Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources

2010-08-03 Thread todd glassey
On 8/3/2010 4:07 PM, ML wrote: > As an SP in the MDU (multi dwelling unit) market we dutifully SWIP > netblocks for each apartment complex/condo/etc. Doing such we > publically publish the physical address an IP lives (sans Apt/Unit #). > > Would anyone feel this is too much information for peopl

Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources

2010-08-03 Thread William Herrin
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Franck Martin wrote: > If it is a business, then accurate address does not seem to me an > issue, if it is a private address, I think a bit of fuzziness is helpful An apartment complex/condo/etc is a business which contains private addresses. Do you sell to the re

Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources

2010-08-03 Thread Franck Martin
If it is a business, then accurate address does not seem to me an issue, if it is a private address, I think a bit of fuzziness is helpful - Original Message - From: "ML" To: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Wednesday, 4 August, 2010 11:07:47 AM Subject: Question of privacy with reassigned resource

Question of privacy with reassigned resources

2010-08-03 Thread ML
As an SP in the MDU (multi dwelling unit) market we dutifully SWIP netblocks for each apartment complex/condo/etc. Doing such we publically publish the physical address an IP lives (sans Apt/Unit #). Would anyone feel this is too much information for people to know? Should our SWIPs be more gener

Re: IANA DNSSEC Testbed to be Decommissioned

2010-08-03 Thread Joe Abley
> ICANN would like to thank Packet Clearing House (PCH) and Dun.com > DynTLD for their support and generous donation of global DNS > resources to the IANA DNSSEC testbed. My apologies to the good people at Dyn -- of course, that should be dyn.com, not what I wrote. Joe

migration tools

2010-08-03 Thread Randy Bush
know any tools, not methods, tools, to o migrate a network from one igp to another (e.g. ospf to is-is), o merge two networks which have common igp but are currently ebgp, o ... think mergers and acquisitions (no i am not gonna do it again:) randy

IANA DNSSEC Testbed to be Decommissioned

2010-08-03 Thread Joe Abley
Colleagues, ICANN has operated the IANA DNSSEC testbed, serving non-production, signed versions of the root, ARPA, IN-ADDR.ARPA, IP6.ARPA, IRIS.ARPA, URN.ARPA, and INT zones for several years. Following the recent completion of DNSSEC deployment in the root zone, this testbed is scheduled to be de

RE: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR BGP within the box question

2010-08-03 Thread Steven.Glogger
thanks oliver, will try and keep you (and the list) updated. -steven -Original Message- From: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) [mailto:oboeh...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 8:06 AM To: Glogger Steven, SCS-NIT-NIO-PIO-DNW-NEO; cisco-...@puck.nether.net; nanog@nanog.org Subject: R