On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 15:46:37 -0700
"Tomas L. Byrnes" wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Roland Perry [mailto:li...@internetpolicyagency.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 12:11 PM
> > To: nanog@nanog.org
> > Subject: Re: Internet Kill Switch.
> >
> > In article
> > ,
> Mat
On 6/19/2010 17:46, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
> [Tomas L. Byrnes] The issue is more that everyone who DOES have access
> has more than one device, and that many of those devices move around. I
> won't get into the "NAT breaks the Internet" war, but it certainly does
> limit the type of applications y
odd.. two of them are in my table... which table are you using
Jim?
--bill
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 05:09:57PM +, deles...@gmail.com wrote:
> I just checked all those /8's none of them are in the table.
>
> -jim
> Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
>
> -Or
> -Original Message-
> From: Roland Perry [mailto:li...@internetpolicyagency.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 12:11 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Internet Kill Switch.
>
> In article
> ,
Matthew
> Petach writes
> >After all with a world population of 7 billion, you certain
In article
, Matthew
Petach writes
After all with a world population of 7 billion, you certainly can't
have "Internet [...] for everyone" with only 4 billion IP addresses,
unless you put a *lot* of NAT in place.
What's the average household size, especially in developing countries.
And does
I just checked all those /8's none of them are in the table.
-jim
Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dillon
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:39:07
To: Lee Howard
Cc: ; Todd Underwood
Subject: Re: Todd Underwood was a little late
" "R
Ok cool. That is similar to what I have. Thank you.
--
Sent using BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Greg Whynott
To: Mike Ruiz ; nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sat Jun 19 11:02:48 2010
Subject: RE:
depending on your vendor equipment you'll need an ACL or a route map
" "Registered but unrouted" would include space that is in use in large
> private networks that aren't visible from your standard sources for
> route views, such as U.S. DoD (6, 11, 22, 26, 28, 29, 30 /8) or U.K.
> MoD (25/8).
Have you verified each of these address ranges or are you just a mindle
depending on your vendor equipment you'll need an ACL or a route map to define
the traffic you wish to Nat and apply it to the 'nat engine'.
if you are doing this on cisco ASA or similar it might look something like this:
-define the interesting traffic with an ACL:
access-list 110 permit ip
I would add the following to FLAIM
- ranonymize from Argus
http://www.qosient.com/argus/anonymization.htm
- Anontools
http://www.ics.forth.gr/dcs/Activities/Projects/anontool.html
- CPAN IP::Anonymous
http://search.cpan.org/~jtk/IP-Anonymous-0.04/lib/IP/Anonymous.pm
But I'm not sure if all of the
To emphasise more this subject, the technical support HP Procurve is
providing (for free) is more consumer level and in my opinion is one of the
key differentiators from teams like Cisco TAC. Here is a short laundry list
of my experience:
For an example a typical phone call to their help desk (onl
11 matches
Mail list logo
