On 25/03/2010, at 4:32 PM, Rudolph Daniel wrote:
> Hi Joe
> You guys ever mount your racks on Barry mounts= vibration mounts..with so
> many shakes you may need to.
> RD
Nope.
Instead, we stick it at the top of big towers that buffer the vibrations as
they go up the tower.
http://en.wikipedia.o
The West Eifel volcanic field (SW of Bonn, Germany) is not far from NL and the
last spectacular eruption there was about 9000 or so years ago (rather recently
in geological terms). And there have been other significant earthquakes in the
region in recorded history. The Lisbon quake in the 18th
> That said, nothing else I'm aware of provides the functionality of iRules.
I'd argue that Zeus' TrafficScript is on par or better than iRules.
Hi Joe
You guys ever mount your racks on Barry mounts= vibration mounts..with so
many shakes you may need to.
RD
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:14:12 -0700
> From: Joe Abley
> Subject: Re: Earthquakes
> To: Ken Gilmour
> Cc: NANOG list
> Message-ID: <69cb2fce-3d0e-44fe-93f4-8f3776d
the a10s actually do pretty good at relatively high load levels as well, and
they do have an asic(multiple), fyi..
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Justin Horstman
wrote:
> The boxes do alright at low load levels. They do not have an asic tech like
> the F5s so choke on large amounts of traffic
On Mar 24, 2010, at 10:14 PM, Bill Stewart wrote:
>>> it seems to me that we'll have widespread ipv4 for +10 years at least,
>> How many 10 year old pieces of kit do you have on your network?
>> Ten years ago we were routing appletalk and IPX. Still doing that now?
>
> Ten years ago I was still
>> it seems to me that we'll have widespread ipv4 for +10 years at least,
> How many 10 year old pieces of kit do you have on your network?
> Ten years ago we were routing appletalk and IPX. Still doing that now?
Ten years ago I was still telling a few customers that Novell Netware had
supported
Yes, agreed. I think the Netscaler falls into the category of the Cisco in
this respect . Seems the F5 gear is the 1000lb gorilla in this category
and for the most part we have no reason to look anywhere else other than doing
our own due diligence with respect to the other vendor offerings in
Very interesting to see about A10's performance- I've heard mixed things
about them.
Just an FYI, the newer F5 platforms don't utilize the ASIC's- the
performance curve of general-purpose CPU's has once again eclipsed what can
be done with specialized silicon without aggressive (and expensive) rev
Thanks all, success.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Rocca [mailto:ro...@start.ca]
Sent: March 24, 2010 8:20 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Cogeco Contact...?
Can someone from the Cogeco NOC please contact me off-list at
roccap2...@yahoo.com? I have tried ipservi...@cogeco.net and
1-905
Can someone from the Cogeco NOC please contact me off-list at
roccap2...@yahoo.com? I have tried ipservi...@cogeco.net and
1-905-333-7055 without luck. Thank you.
On 2010-03-24, at 13:12, Ken Gilmour wrote:
> We had a 6.2 last year in Costa Rica... We immediately regretted where we
> had placed our racks and are almost finished a project to move them to a
> concrete floor (rather than that compressed cardboard stuff). Lost a lot of
> hard drives that day!
> -Original Message-
> From: Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 11:48 PM
> To: Jeroen van Aart
> Cc: NANOG list
> Subject: Re: Earthquakes
>
>
> On Mar 24, 2010, at 3:32 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
>
> > Owen DeLong wrote:
> >> I've been through more
On Mar 24, 2010, at 3:32 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> Owen DeLong wrote:
>> I've been through more than one quake in the 5.2-5.5 range, so, perhaps they
>> are
>> rare in the Netherlands (6 million years or so), but, in California they are
>> much more
>> frequent, perhaps 5-7 years or so.
>
>
Michael Thomas wrote:
Something to keep in mind is that raw magnitude isn't the whole story. The
ground composition is *much* more important when it comes to
destructiveness.
A 5.0 earthquake in the Netherlands might be extremely damaging because of
liquifaction.
Yes the one I mentioned from
The boxes do alright at low load levels. They do not have an asic tech like the
F5s so choke on large amounts of traffic. Management is a bit immature and you
will find yourself having to use the CLI and the Gui to accomplish most
advanced tasks.
When we put them head to head A10 AX3200 vs F5 6
Owen DeLong wrote:
I've been through more than one quake in the 5.2-5.5 range, so, perhaps they are
rare in the Netherlands (6 million years or so), but, in California they are
much more
frequent, perhaps 5-7 years or so.
Well, 6 million years was a "slight" exaggeration to get a point across.
> when will you turn off -all- IPv4 in your network?
> no snmp/aaa, no syslog, no radius, no licensed s/w keyed to a v4
> address,
> no need to keep logs for leos' (whats the data retention law in your
> jurisdiction?)
> etc...
The same day that we stop using RS-232C
Folks,
Since the last internet cleaning day, we've discovered that straightening the
ethernet cables as much as possible, eliminating unnecessary bends and kinks
significantly speeds up the network.
Also, taking a cue from my sports car, we've contracted with a supplier to make
all our new ca
Something to keep in mind is that raw magnitude isn't the whole story. The
ground composition is *much* more important when it comes to destructiveness.
A 5.0 earthquake in the Netherlands might be extremely damaging because of
liquifaction. Also: California since we get quakes all the time, our r
When I was living in San Jose/Sunnyvale and we had a 5.2 in 2001? (can't
remember the date, was a bit ago). The only effect I felt from it was as if
someone had taken the back of my chair and pushed it forward, that was about
it. Of course at the same time there was a large Earthquake in Turkey b
In California, 4s are a regular occurrence and we have 2-3s every day.
I rarely notice anything less than a 5, and, often do not notice up to a 5.5
in my area.
The worst quake I have personally experienced was the 1989 Loma Prietta quake
which was a 7.9 IIRC. It caused some significant damage
When I lived in the Bay Area, I noticed that 4.x quakes only tended to
shake the room ever-so-slightly. You could only really tell if they
happened, if you happened to see liquid in a glass moving.
Leah
-Original Message-
From: Ken Gilmour [mailto:ken.gilm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
We had a 6.2 last year in Costa Rica... We immediately regretted where we
had placed our racks and are almost finished a project to move them to a
concrete floor (rather than that compressed cardboard stuff). Lost a lot of
hard drives that day! We regularly have quakes between the 4-5 region here.
I saw a recent(-ish) short thread about a mag. 4 quake in the SF Bay
Area. This
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsus/Maps/US2/36.38.-123.-121.php
should provide with everything you need to know.
I check it on a daily basis and it's been rather quiet the past week or
2 or so. Actu
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:27:37AM -0600, fiberOptiC wrote:
> I'm looking for a hotmail mail admin or someone with the information I'm
> looking for.
> I have a client that is trying to block the world, but only allow certain ip
> addresses through. It looks like hotmail uses a large pool of ip ad
I'm looking for a hotmail mail admin or someone with the information I'm
looking for.
I have a client that is trying to block the world, but only allow certain ip
addresses through. It looks like hotmail uses a large pool of ip addresses
for attachments so we've had a hard time determining what ip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Software Session Initiation
Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerabilities
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20100324-sip
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2010 March 24 1600 UTC (GMT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Software NAT Skinny Call Control
Protocol Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20100324-sccp
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2010 March 24 1600 UTC (GMT
On 3/23/2010 10:59 PM, Mark Newton wrote:
> On 24/03/2010, at 4:10 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
>> it seems to me that we'll have widespread ipv4 for +10 years at least,
>>
> How many 10 year old pieces of kit do you have on your network?
>
Are you kidding? I'm in state education t
When we were running AppleTalk and IPX not many of us had corporate access
to the internet. I remember those IPX days, and one of the driving reasons
to move to IP was to get internet access. I remember adding IP to our
Netware 4.x servers. Because IPv4 is the lingua franca of the internet, I
do
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:35:38AM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
> >
> >> Only until v4 becomes more expensive (using whatever metric matters to
> >> you) than v6.
> >
> > I have v4, it's not going to be anymore expensive than it is today for
> > me... for new folks sure, but I've got mine.
> >
> If
Dear colleagues,
The RIPE NCC implemented a RIPE Database Query API in form of a RESTful
Web Service. See a detailed description on RIPE Labs:
http://labs.ripe.net/content/ripe-database-api
We are curious to find out if this is useful or if you have any
suggestions. You can leave comments i
>
> apples and oranges.
>
When did novell turn orange? I thought they were red. ;-)
>> I'd expect that v4 will still exist in legacy form behind firewalls,
>> but I think its deprecation on the public internet will happen a lot
>> faster than anyone expects.
>
> maybe you're right, but... I do
34 matches
Mail list logo
