On Mar 13, 2010, at 9:49 PM, Rick Ernst wrote:
A couple of different incantations searching the archive didn't
enlighten
me, and I find it hard to believe this hasn't been discussed.
Apologies and
a request for pointers if I'm rehashing an old question.
Don't have the pointers handy, but
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Rick Ernst wrote:
A /48 seems to be the standard end-user/multi-homed customer allocation and
is the minimum allocation size from ARIN. A /32 provides 65K /48s so, in
theory, we could give each of our customers a /48 and still have room for
growth. A /48 also appears to be
A couple of different incantations searching the archive didn't enlighten
me, and I find it hard to believe this hasn't been discussed. Apologies and
a request for pointers if I'm rehashing an old question.
As a small/regional ISP, we got our /32 assigned and it's time to start
moving forward (cu
Yup, what Larry said.I wouldn't be too concerned about it. But some
managers may make a big deal...
Some sites use images located at a different webserver that isn't HTTPS, and
sometimes there are
hidden iframes that bring you info from non-secure sites. But the actual login
is posted to a
adrian kok wrote:
Hi
I have questions about security
I am using mozila to access gmail as https://mail.google.com/mail
Why mozilla prompts me the alert box?
"You have requested an encrypted page that contains some unencrypted information.
Information that you see or enter on this page could
Hi
I have questions about security
I am using mozila to access gmail as https://mail.google.com/mail
Why mozilla prompts me the alert box?
"You have requested an encrypted page that contains some unencrypted
information. Information that you see or enter on this page could easily be
read by a
In a message written on Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:47:28AM -0500, Paul Stewart
wrote:
> Open ended questions obviously - looking for many ideas.
I think a key question to ask yourself is who needs to be able to
interpret your names?
Depending on your business, customers, engineers, etc you may have
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 04:58:11AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> > On my last network I named all the routers after simpsons characters.
>
> scaled well?
Don't forget there were 5 Snowballs...
Yeah, just learning that... got a *tonne* of offline replies.
Planets won't work well, simpson characters we'll run out very
quickly umm.. forgot the rest. We were looking for something that
makes sense to the function of the box itself and scales up (as per some
other folks point)
Some
Just wanted to say thanks to everyone who responded - game me more to
think about than I thought was possible ;)
Paul
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which
it is addressed
On March 13, 2010 at 10:53 c...@sandcastl.es (ck) wrote:
> i believe in keeping host names as short as possible, so to start, i
At BU we brought down about 1/3 of the internet (no joke!) around 1985
when our very first host table entries to SRI-NIC contained single
letter hosts (like a.bu.edu) a
On March 13, 2010 at 18:24 aa...@wholesaleinternet.net
(aa...@wholesaleinternet.net) wrote:
> STD's
hmm, since we actually are STD.COM that could be a useful idea...
-b
On 3/13/2010 10:12 AM, Tim Sanderson wrote:
...Types of coffee and donuts
Tim
-Original Message-
From: James Bensley [mailto:jwbens...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 12:27 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Network Naming Conventions
On 13 March 2010 16:06, James Jones wrote:
> > On my last network I named all the routers after simpsons
> characters.
>
> scaled well?
>
He wrote "last" instead of "current"...make your own conclusions ;)
> On my last network I named all the routers after simpsons characters.
scaled well?
On 3/13/2010 10:47, Paul Stewart wrote:
> Hi Folks...
>
>
>
> With many changes going on this year in our network, I figured it's a
> good time to revisit our naming conventions used in our networks.
I favor using CLLI code (well fake ones)
TAMQFLTART1 is in the city of tampa (TAMQ) in FLorid
> On Mar 12, 2010, at 4:45 PM, Joe Greco wrote:
> > There's no way it's as widely used, and generally speaking, it appears
> > that those who have used it have done so out of ignorance and(/or?)
> > stupidity, sometimes blindly following documentation without
> > comprehending, etc.
>
> I don't kn
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Paul Stewart wrote:
With many changes going on this year in our network, I figured it's a
good time to revisit our naming conventions used in our networks.
Today, we use the following example:
Core1-rtr-to-ge1-1-1-vl20.nexicom.net
Core box #1, rtr=router, to=location, ge1
Heh.
Host naming discussions is like religion and politics at parties.
It only leads to someone going home crying, red wine spilled all
over their new dress, and a black eye.
Not in that order.
-r
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:47:28AM -0500, Paul Stewart wrote:
> Hi Folks...
>
>
>
> With many c
On 03/12/2010 01:20 PM, Axel Morawietz wrote:
> Am 12.03.2010 17:03, schrieb Nathan:
>> [...] Its
>> amazing how prolific 1.x traffic is.
>
> one reason might also be, that at least T-Mobile Germany uses 1.2.3.*
> for their proxies that deliver the content to mobile phones.
> And I'm not sure what
i believe in keeping host names as short as possible, so to start, i
wouldn't put the location in the hostname, but putting the loc/pop code in
dns (eg: sjc1.nexicom, tor1.nexicom, iad1.nexicom, etc), same goes for rtr,
you really dont need that, imo
personally, i prefer the shortest possible name
islands
rivers/creeks
types of swords
fruit
minerals
fermented things
3char strings
punctuation marks
twins
...
--bill
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:47:28AM -0500, Paul Stewart wrote:
> Hi Folks...
>
>
>
> With many changes going on this year in our network, I figured it's a
> good time to r
On Mar 12, 2010, at 4:45 PM, Joe Greco wrote:
> There's no way it's as widely used, and generally speaking, it appears
> that those who have used it have done so out of ignorance and(/or?)
> stupidity, sometimes blindly following documentation without
> comprehending, etc.
I don't know about that
Singers:
tenchi% ping elvis
elvis is alive
tenchi%
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, aa...@wholesaleinternet.net wrote:
STD's
--Original Message--
From: Tim Sanderson
To: NANOG list
Subject: RE: Network Naming Conventions
Sent: Mar 13, 2010 12:12 PM
...Types of coffee and donuts
Tim
-Ori
Hey Paul,
> Core1-rtr-to-ge1-1-1-vl20.nexicom.net
>
> Core box #1, rtr=router, to=location, ge1-1-1=interface, vl20=vlan etc
> etc
>
That's disturbingly similar to ours :)
tflns2-ge0-1-vl1.caneris.com
TF = Toronto/Front
LNS #2 = LNS #2
ge0-1 = interface
vl1 = VLAN 1
>
> Going forward, I
For end-point hosts ("servers") I prefer terse topical names for
single-function machines ("Finance", "Purchasing") and some predictable
pattern that ties somehow to the organization for multipurpose machines
("Bluejay", "Parrot").
For network equipment at end points I prefer a string that starts
STD's
--Original Message--
From: Tim Sanderson
To: NANOG list
Subject: RE: Network Naming Conventions
Sent: Mar 13, 2010 12:12 PM
...Types of coffee and donuts
Tim
-Original Message-
From: James Bensley [mailto:jwbens...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 12:27 PM
To:
...Types of coffee and donuts
Tim
-Original Message-
From: James Bensley [mailto:jwbens...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 12:27 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Network Naming Conventions
On 13 March 2010 16:06, James Jones wrote:
> On my last network I named all the routers a
On 13 March 2010 16:06, James Jones wrote:
> On my last network I named all the routers after simpsons characters.
We use ancient Greek gods.
--
Regards,
James ;)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul,
If my memory serves me correct, Richard presented traceroute presto at
nanog47 that covered location identifiers.
HTH,
regards,
/virendra
Paul Stewart wrote:
> Hi Folks...
>
>
>
> With many changes going on this year in our network, I f
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Mark Scholten wrote:
..
> It is probably the best way to get 1.x free if it is used by big websites.
> However I don't think that they will change it (to only use these IPs). I
> think they have an interest somewhere to not change it...
If they added a basic java
On my last network I named all the routers after simpsons characters.
On 3/13/10 10:47 AM, Paul Stewart wrote:
Hi Folks...
With many changes going on this year in our network, I figured it's a
good time to revisit our naming conventions used in our networks.
Today, we use the following ex
Hi Folks...
With many changes going on this year in our network, I figured it's a
good time to revisit our naming conventions used in our networks.
Today, we use the following example:
Core1-rtr-to-ge1-1-1-vl20.nexicom.net
Core box #1, rtr=router, to=location, ge1-1-1=interface, vl20=vl
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Greco [mailto:jgr...@ns.sol.net]
> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 10:53 PM
> To: Nathan
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: YouTube AS36561 began announcing 1.0.0.0/8
>
> > There are sizable chunks that are fairly quiet (un-interesting
> > numbers, luck of
34 matches
Mail list logo
