Re: What is the most standard subnet length on internet

Basically /24s are the longest prefix size accepted by providers unless you are dealing RTBH (triggered blackholing services). Another requirement to ensure acceptance of an IP block, especially smaller assignments are equivalent route objects matching it (in most cases your provider will do it on

Re: What is good in modular routers these days?

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009, William Pitcock wrote: > I don't need any of that stuff, just BGP, OSPF and fast packet > forwarding for IPv4. But the point is that I need only routing > functionality, I don't need switching functionality like on a Cisco > 6500-class system. I bet if you went and spoke to

Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Mohacsi Janos wrote: As far as I know Cisco cancelled ASR14000 platform, but the developed supervisor will be available to CRS-1 platform The FP-40 (downscaled MSC) has been in the price list for over a month now. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.

About 3 months ago, Cisco Account Team was recommending AS14000 for our company, and we rejected it. Poor product development management! Alex Mohacsi Janos wrote: > > > > On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Alex H. Ryu wrote: > >> >> Because of nowadays network scalability demands, Cisco is preparing ASR >>

Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Alex H. Ryu wrote: Because of nowadays network scalability demands, Cisco is preparing ASR 14000 series to replace this one, I think. ^^ Basically ASR 14000 is downgrade version of CRS-1, but I consider it is still developing or beta product. As far as I know Cisco ca

[Fwd: [ GLSA 200907-15 ] Nagios: Execution of arbitrary code]

While this is the Gentoo advisory, it's generic enough. Gadi. -- Gadi Evron, g...@linuxbox.org. Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/ --- Begin Message --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Gentoo Linux Security Advisory G

Seeking facilities managers at colo facilities

All, I'm working on a grant for a new type of power co generation. We need a letter of interest as part of our application. Are there any facilities managers who would be interested in working with me on this? Specifically folks who are doing work with container based systems. More details

Re: What is good in modular routers these days?

On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 12:02 +, Edward B. DREGER wrote: > MA> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:31:13 +0200 (CEST) > MA> From: Mikael Abrahamsson > > MA> > With a little creativity, it can _almost_ be done for IPv4. > MA> > MA> That's most likely a big _almost_. > > Maybe. And maybe I'm using worst-c

Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.

Core typically references functionality, not the number of network devices at that layer. tv - Original Message - From: "Richard A Steenbergen" To: "Bailey Stephen" Cc: Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 8:46 AM Subject: Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router. On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 a

Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.

On Jul 20, 2009, at 9:50 PM, Alex H. Ryu wrote: Cisco is preparing ASR 14000 series to replace this one, I think. It's always a good idea to check the status/availability of a given platform prior to making any plans which depend upon it. -

Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.

Because of nowadays network scalability demands, Cisco is preparing ASR 14000 series to replace this one, I think. ^^ Basically ASR 14000 is downgrade version of CRS-1, but I consider it is still developing or beta product. Alex Paul Stewart wrote: > Agreed... we migrated away from GSR to 7600

Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 02:22:22PM +0100, Bailey Stephen wrote: > > I previously ran a single 7609 with dual Sup720's as a Core Internet BGP > > Router, running OSPF & iBGP > > It's hard to classify a single router as a "core", don't

Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 02:22:22PM +0100, Bailey Stephen wrote: > I previously ran a single 7609 with dual Sup720's as a Core Internet BGP > Router, running OSPF & iBGP It's hard to classify a single router as a "core", don't you think? -- Richard A Steenbergenhttp://www.e-gerbil.net/ras

RE: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.

Agreed... we migrated away from GSR to 7600 and now looking at migrating back...;) GSR was 100% rock solid for us with PRP-2 processors sup720-3bxl has been good but no comparison... -Original Message- From: Neil J. McRae [mailto:n...@domino.org] Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 6:26 AM To

RE: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.

I previously ran a single 7609 with dual Sup720's as a Core Internet BGP Router, running OSPF & iBGP Never had any problems and was a very stable platform Stephen Bailey - Senior Lead Systems Engineer FUJITSU Fujitsu Services Limited, Registered in England no 96056, Registered Office 22 Baker St

Re: What is good in modular routers these days?

MA> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:31:13 +0200 (CEST) MA> From: Mikael Abrahamsson MA> > With a little creativity, it can _almost_ be done for IPv4. MA> MA> That's most likely a big _almost_. Maybe. And maybe I'm using worst-case synthetic test sets in addition to real routing sets. MA> When someon

Re: Outages in wales ?

On Sat, 18 Jul 2009 21:47:37 +0100 Rob Evans wrote: > > but a buddy in wales have massive problems with internet connectivity > > > Or maybe there has been a bit of storm which has blown it 3,500 miles > to the west. If it has, please look after it, especially mid-Wales > and North Wales, t

Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.

On Jul 20, 2009, at 5:26 PM, Neil J. McRae wrote: GSR is far better platform. Concur 100%. --- Roland Dobbins // Unfortunately, inefficiency scales really well. --

RE: Cisco 12000 series routers and IOS XR.

Jim, We converted our entire 12K backbone to IOS XR, it was painful but Its been relatively stable since. Haven't seen any issues like this. What SPA are you using? Neil. -Original Message- From: Jim Wininger [mailto:jwinin...@indianafiber.net] Sent: 13 July 2009 21:20 To: nanog@nanog.o

RE: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.

Personally I'd avoid this platform given 6+ years of trying to make it work reliably. GSR is far better platform.