Nathan Ward wrote:
[..]
> I think someone wrote a draft explaining this a while back.. not sure
> where or what it was called.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6in4 = proto-41
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6to4 = proto-41 with 2002::/16 dst
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/6rd= proto-41 with own 6t
On 14/07/2009, at 4:23 AM, Rick Ernst wrote:
Either they don't exist, or my Google-fu is particularly bad this
morning.
I'm trying to get my toes wet with IPv6. I've established an internal
6to4/4to6 tunnel. I'd also like to have a testbed for access to
public v6
sites. I'm also trying t
What release are you running? We are currently at 3.6.2 (as recommended by
Cisco (our SE and some upper levels)).
On 7/13/09 6:15 PM, "Dan Snyder" wrote:
> We also have a couple running full tables of BGP with XR code and they have
> been running solid for a couple of years now with no problems
ryan.sla...@tac.com wrote:
> Take this with the grain of salt that I do not work for APC, but for a
> sister company. The word that I have heard is that they are in no rush
> to discontinue any of the product line. In fact rumor is that APC was
> very happy to have the MGE products available to t
How about, "Don't reply to Dean Anderson". :-)
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> [SNIP]
>
> Everyone,
>
> Please do not CC nanog@nanog.org when replying to one of Dean Anderson's
> ... uh ... missives[*]. We do not see the original, so by replying and
> CC'ing the li
We also have a couple running full tables of BGP with XR code and they have
been running solid for a couple of years now with no problems.
-Dan
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Scott Berkman wrote:
> We have 2 12k's on our borders and both are running IOS GS code, but are
> rock solid.
>
>
See, now thats what I like to hear after an acquisition like this.
You expect a certain redundancy but to have it said that, "we're not
merely interested in the underlying technology, we like the products
just the say they are and have no plans to change them (except maybe
to standardize the manage
We have 2 12k's on our borders and both are running IOS GS code, but are
rock solid.
-Scott
-Original Message-
From: Jim Wininger [mailto:jwinin...@indianafiber.net]
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 4:20 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Cisco 12000 series routers and IOS XR.
Is anyone
Take this with the grain of salt that I do not work for APC, but for a
sister company. The word that I have heard is that they are in no rush
to discontinue any of the product line. In fact rumor is that APC was
very happy to have the MGE products available to them for sale to
customers. As a si
We asked our local APC rep that exact question last week. He told us that the
MGE line of UPSes fill a whole that APC doesn't have in their own lineup, and
they will continue being sold as the product for folks absolutely require a
typical double-conversion online UPS. As opposed to the 'hybri
> Or are you talking about Eaton's?
>
> http://www.eaton.com/EatonCom/SearchResults/CT_136576
History (as I recall it).
Schneider Electric bought MGE late 2003
Schneider Electric bought APC late 2006
(and merges APC/MGE product line, which has overlap)
Schneider Electric sold "small" MGE prod
> We have 3 big Comet systems, and we're absolutely delighted with
> them. Their service is the best we receive from any vendor we deal
> with.
I'll second that. We have a 50 KVA MGE Comet and it has been rock solid, and
their support is excellent.
While I still have a bunch of MGE Comet systems running, we did take one
electrical room and replace them with Symmetra PX's, It did require some
conduit work as they were moved from the wall to the center (but they are not
as deep as a Comet) , to give the required cleareances. These are not y
Is anyone on the list running the Cisco 12000 Series routers with XR? We
have a couple of these in our network and are having a few issues with them.
Specifically the line cards will reboot for some unknown reason
(12000-SIP-501). We recently replaced one of the cards and the new hardware
(<6mo ol
Or are you talking about Eaton's?
http://www.eaton.com/EatonCom/SearchResults/CT_136576
Dixon, Justin a écrit :
I'm curious if anyone might know what the future of the MGE line of
UPS
systems are. My concern is that they're dead-end since being merged
into
APC, and APC wanti
>
> I'm curious if anyone might know what the future of the MGE line of UPS
> systems are. My concern is that they're dead-end since being merged into
> APC, and APC wanting to sell me APC stuff. The problem I face is that my
> facility was designed with separate equipment spaces, which is great fo
[SNIP]
Everyone,
Please do not CC nanog@nanog.org when replying to one of Dean
Anderson's ... uh ... missives[*]. We do not see the original, so by
replying and CC'ing the list, you are helping him get his ... er ...
message[*] to a wider audience. And if you have actually read any of
We have 3 big Comet systems, and we're absolutely delighted with
them. Their service is the best we receive from any vendor we deal
with.
On 13-Jul-09, at 3:42 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
I'm curious if anyone might know what the future of the MGE line of
UPS
systems are. My concern is t
> I'm curious if anyone might know what the future of the MGE line of
UPS
> systems are. My concern is that they're dead-end since being merged
into
> APC, and APC wanting to sell me APC stuff. The problem I face is that
my
> facility was designed with separate equipment spaces, which is great
for
I'm curious if anyone might know what the future of the MGE line of UPS
systems are. My concern is that they're dead-end since being merged into
APC, and APC wanting to sell me APC stuff. The problem I face is that my
facility was designed with separate equipment spaces, which is great for
normal e
Nanog,
I was just looking at the H3C 12500 enterprise product for which I received
a slideshow presentation on its features and comparisons to Nexus 7018,
Foundry/Brocade RX32, Juniper EX8218 and Force10 E1200.
It does not look like they have a significant market share but make a lot of
bold cla
Hello all,
I was wondering if anyone has a good, trusted, non-partial source for
3rd party testing and/or comparisons of the major routing hardware
vendors. I'm willing to pay for a subscription / membership to an
organization if the information is well assembled recent.
Specifically, I'd
Multiple responses of tunnelbroker.net. Couldn't have been any easier to
setup and get going.
Thanks!
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Chad Burnham wrote:
> Rick,
>
> I use this one:
>
> http://www.tunnelbroker.net/
>
> Free!
>
> Chad
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Ernst [mailto
Folks,
A few announcements:
(i).Thank everyone again for attending NANOG 46. The
NANOG 46 survey is open for one more week. If you
haven't taken the survey yet, please see
http://www.sur
Yeah, just don't ask a certain female sales person there for more than a
few quotes without buying...
I was utterly embarrassed while dealing with NHR - never been told off
by a commissioned sales person before. Requested a series of quotes on
a Cisco GSR and made it very clear we already had a p
Hello Rick,
try
traceroute to 192.88.99.1 (192.88.99.1), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 yttrium.anul.nsa (7.19.30.39) 3 ms 1 ms 1 ms
2 217.0.116.228 (217.0.116.228) 47 ms 46 ms *
3 217.0.78.50 (217.0.78.50) 58 ms 46 ms 45 ms
4 217.239.40.177 (217.239.40.177) 48 ms 51 ms 49 ms
All,
I would like to second the vote for NHR(Network Hardware). I have purchased
from Joe Zender there for years and the support, price, warranty, and quality
has been outstanding. I placed his contact info below, because it is truly a
rare thing when I can say he is a great sales person.
Rick,
I use this one:
http://www.tunnelbroker.net/
Free!
Chad
-Original Message-
From: Rick Ernst [mailto:na...@shreddedmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 10:24 AM
To: NANOG
Subject: Public/testing 4to6 gateway?
Either they don't exist, or my Google-fu is particularly bad this mor
Either they don't exist, or my Google-fu is particularly bad this morning.
I'm trying to get my toes wet with IPv6. I've established an internal
6to4/4to6 tunnel. I'd also like to have a testbed for access to public v6
sites. I'm also trying to find some clue at my upstreams, but figured I'd
as
Try http://www.advantageoptics.com/.
Ric.
Softlayer.
www.softlayer.com.
-Original Message-
From: Chad Burnham [mailto:cburn...@du.edu]
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 11:07 AM
To: Adam Rothschild; Duane Waddle
Cc: na...@merit.edu
Subject: RE: OEMs for X2 10G LAN PHY optics
HI,
We have be
HI,
We have been very happy with Champion and NHR for such equipment:
http://www.championone.net/
&
http://www.networkhardware.com/
Stellar pricing and support.
Chad
Chad D Burnham
Telecommunications Network Planner
University Technology Services - Network Services
University of Denver
2100
Use a /30 across the circuit and do multihop BGP using other IPs.
On Friday 10 July 2009 13:48:15 Jay Nakamura wrote:
> We are getting an Ethernet DIA circuit from AT&T but they insist that
> they can't BGP peer with 2 routers on our side. The WAN circuit can
> only have /30 they say. Has anyone
32 matches
Mail list logo
