Try noice-canceling aviation headsets (GA or helicopter models have truly
amazing noise suppression). High-end models come with cellphone
interface. I don't think cellphones will work in many data centers, but I
think rigging interface from a normal cordless phone to the headset is
pretty simple.
Hi Justin,
Just FYI - Global Crossing can currently deliver dual stack/native v6
transit in downtown KC,MO. You can either colo with them at 1100 Main St, or
possibly have them haul a wave to one of the other major downtown carrier
hotels they have strands running through / into (1102 Grand/B
- Original Message -
From: "Freddie Sessler"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 6:31 PM
Subject: WISP NMS recommendations
Hi Folks,I am looking for recommendations on an NMS system for use in
managing a multivendor wireless infrastructure. Specifically we run mostly
Motorola point to
That's an excellent question, Freddie. I am also interested in what people are
using for WISP Infrastructure. We also use Motorola PTP, Canopy, as well as
Airstream, Ubiquiti, Trango, and WaveRider.
Regards,
Shon Elliott
Senior Network Engineer
unWired Broadband, Inc.
Freddie Sessler wrote:
> Hi
Paul Stewart wrote:
> Hi folks...
>
> Looking for some feedback on using Hurricane Electric as an upstream?
Even though I only have tunnel relationships with them for v6 (ie free
transit), I'd have to say that between:
- their excellent automation tools
- their time-to-response
- their level of
Hi Folks,I am looking for recommendations on an NMS system for use in
managing a multivendor wireless infrastructure. Specifically we run mostly
Motorola point to point, point to multipoint(Canopy platform) and mesh
radios devices We have looked at the One Point Wireless Manager but this
product in
Michael J McCafferty wrote:
All,
I'd be OK if we were in a facility that was only average in terms of
noise, but we are not. I need an exceptional phone for the data center.
Something that doesn't transmit the horrible background noise to the
other end, and something that is loud without
Paul Stewart wrote:
Hi folks...
Looking for some feedback on using Hurricane Electric as an upstream?
I'll second what others have already said.
I've interacted with them a decent bit, and have always gotten prompt,
knowledgeable, and helpful support and service when I've called/emailed.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:29 PM, David Klann wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:41:23 -0500
> Paul Stewart wrote:
>
>> Looking for some feedback on using Hurricane Electric as an upstream?
>>
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> My employer, Airstream Communications, uses
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:41:23 -0500
Paul Stewart wrote:
> Looking for some feedback on using Hurricane Electric as an upstream?
>
Hi Paul,
My employer, Airstream Communications, uses HE for one of its three
upstream Internet providers. We have an asymmetric 1GB inbound, and
512MB outbound conn
I wouldn't consider this a defect. Historically L2 and L3 devices have
always been separate. When you get L3 switch those functions are just
combined into one device. In Cisco devices that support CEF, the CEF
table is used to make all forwarding decisions. But the CEF table is
dependent the ARP an
Michael J McCafferty wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 18:38 -0700, sean head wrote:
Nathan Ward wrote:
On 18/06/2009, at 1:31 PM, Michael J McCafferty wrote:
All,
I'd be OK if we were in a facility that was only average in terms of
noise, but we are not. I need an exceptional p
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 18:38 -0700, sean head wrote:
> Nathan Ward wrote:
> > On 18/06/2009, at 1:31 PM, Michael J McCafferty wrote:
> >
> >> All,
> >> I'd be OK if we were in a facility that was only average in terms of
> >> noise, but we are not. I need an exceptional phone for the data center
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Nathan Ward wrote:
>
> Not 100% what you asked for, but the noise cancelling Jawbone bluetooth
> earpieces are great.
As much as I love my Jawbone (first gen model) I've never found it loud
enough to work well in most datacenters. The person on the other end of
In a message written on Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 02:32:44PM -0700, Brian Shope
wrote:
> Anyone have any suggestions on either prevention/monitoring?
If you control the servers, writing a small program to emit a packet
every 300 seconds or so out every interface should be nearly trivial,
and will insu
I have similar experience in various equinix datacenters. I finally
resorted to using a blue-tooth capable phone and bringing in my
Aviation ANR headset with blootooth capabilities.
It's a pricey headset for just using in a datacenter, but, I love having
it in the airplane and it also works well
Nathan Ward wrote:
> On 18/06/2009, at 1:31 PM, Michael J McCafferty wrote:
>
>> All,
>> I'd be OK if we were in a facility that was only average in terms of
>> noise, but we are not. I need an exceptional phone for the data center.
>> Something that doesn't transmit the horrible background noi
We have three main cities wherein eyeballs live. Currently we have San
Jose and San Francisco traffic egressing in SF, and Los Angeles
egressing in LA. There is one private 2x1gig long haul linking SJC to
LA and a 1x 10gig linking SJC to SF. i.e SF <-10gig-> SJC <-2gig-> LA
Each area is a se
On 18/06/2009, at 1:31 PM, Michael J McCafferty wrote:
All,
I'd be OK if we were in a facility that was only average in terms of
noise, but we are not. I need an exceptional phone for the data
center.
Something that doesn't transmit the horrible background noise to the
other end, and
All,
I'd be OK if we were in a facility that was only average in terms of
noise, but we are not. I need an exceptional phone for the data center.
Something that doesn't transmit the horrible background noise to the
other end, and something that is loud without being painful for the user
of
Hi folks...
Looking for some feedback on using Hurricane Electric as an upstream?
Thanks,
Paul
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which
it is addressed and contains confiden
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Sean Donelan wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>>
>> The cymru bogons list and the spamhaus drop list target two entirely
>> distinct issues and they shouldnt be confused together.
>
> Correct. And whatever list you use, for whatever purpo
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
The cymru bogons list and the spamhaus drop list target two entirely
distinct issues and they shouldnt be confused together.
Correct. And whatever list you use, for whatever purpose, at the time you
start using it also set up a process to upd
Ouch... latency must be awful.
I suppose this is based on Cogents reputation but who knows. The whole
peering aspect of the networking business is often a mystery.
AKK wrote:
My main concern for European Cogent users is - no European peering with
global crossing - traffic goes via NY JFK. I
In a layer 3 switch I consider unicast flooding due to an L2 cam table timeout
a design defect. To test vendors' L3 switches for this defect we have used a
traffic generator to send 50-100 Mbps of pings to a device that does not reply
to the pings, where the L3 switch was routing from one vlan t
My main concern for European Cogent users is - no European peering with
global crossing - traffic goes via NY JFK. It has been like this for at
least a year and staff been giving assurances this should be sorted
soon. Probably there are more bad peerings - please share.
6: so-7-0-0c0.rt1.m
> After debugging the problem we added "mac-address-table aging-time
> 14400" to our data center switches. That syncs the mac aging time to
> the same timeout value as the ARP timeout
This helps, seconded.
Deepak Jain
AiNET
I have had the same issue in the past. The best fix for this has been to
set the Layer2/3 aging timers to be the same.
Matthew Huff wrote:
> Unicast flooding is a common occurrence in large datacenters especially with
> asymmetrical paths caused by different first hop routers (via HSRP, VRRP,
>
Unicast flooding is a common occurrence in large datacenters especially with
asymmetrical paths caused by different first hop routers (via HSRP, VRRP, etc).
We ran into this some time ago. Most arp sensitive systems such as clusters,
HSRP, content switches etc are smart enough to send out gratui
Recently while running a packet capture I came across some unicast flooding
that was happening on my network. One of our core switches didn't have the
mac-address for a server, and was flooding all packets destined to that
server. It wasn't learning the mac-address because the server was
respondi
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
I have not used MAPS, so I cannot comment on its utility. but I have
never heard a single credible claim Mr. Vixie is a spammer, more or less
a verifiable one. (Yes, that includes the claim below.) From my personal
experience, Mr. Vixie is very much the opposite of a sp
> What will you do when you get a call from Khamenei, and then one from Obama?
hungup and keep the packets flowing ?
Can someone from Hotmail contact me off list?
Sorry for the SPAM posting, we've tried other methods.
Thanks
-b
--
Bill Blackford
Senior Network Engineer
Technology Systems Group
Northwest Regional ESD
my /home away from home
This is a useful reminder that nanog creates a large part of the battlefield on
which state and non-state players constantly prosecute their Information
Warfare agendas.
What will you do when you get a call from Khamenei, and then one from Obama?
Armor up, boys and girls.
David Hiers
CCIE (R
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Jeremy L. Gaddis wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Steve Pirk wrote:
> > There are some, ehrm, "boxen" out on the 'net to allow them to get around
> > the active blocking going on, but most of the citizen reporters are
> unable
> > to even get a conection
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>
> Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> Stephen Kratzer wrote:
>>
>>> And, they have no plans to support IPv6.
>> Ouch!
>>
>> I hope this is a non-starter for a lot of folks.
>
> read the rest of the thread...
...unfortunately, my message was sent out on the 11th, but just received
yest
Traffic from bogon IP space is more likely than anything else to be
the result of misconfiguration rather than a spammer abusing it.
The cymru bogons list and the spamhaus drop list target two entirely
distinct issues and they shouldnt be confused together.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Michie
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:24 AM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 02:14:31AM -0400, kris foster wrote:
>> Simply untrue, at the Peering BOF yesterday Cogent said they are
>> rolling this out.
>
> They saw my "How to deploy IPv6 in 30 minutes or less" tutorial on
> Sunday and a
2009/6/11 Tore Anderson
> > And, they have no plans to support IPv6.
>
> I have been promised, in writing, that they will provide us with native
> IPv6 transit before the end of the year.
>
> I'm based in Europe, though. Perhaps they're more flexible and
> customer-friendly here than in the US?
Hi!
Both containing prefixes that should not be announced on the internet,
but often used by spammers trying to deliver their content.
When did you experience this last time, this is not what we see on
various antispam projects.
So if you have new information, please share, we didnt see bog
Well, there is always the bogon-list from Team Cymru
http://www.cymru.com/Documents/bogon-bn-agg.txt
And the bogon-list from BGPmon
http://bgpmon.net/showbogons.php?inet=4&global=yes&private=yes
Both containing prefixes that should not be announced on the internet,
but often used by spammers tr
41 matches
Mail list logo
