Joel Jaeggli wrote: > > Steve Bertrand wrote: >> Stephen Kratzer wrote: >> >>> And, they have no plans to support IPv6. >> Ouch! >> >> I hope this is a non-starter for a lot of folks. > > read the rest of the thread...
...unfortunately, my message was sent out on the 11th, but just received yesterday by the list. I had both nanog@nanog.org and na...@merit.edu Cc'd, so I don't know which one failed. I have problems sending to the NANOG list from my IPv6 server, so I'll have to find out which destination list address is breaking for me... Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (st...@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 11 Jun 2009 14:39:10 -0000 Received: from v6.ibctech.ca ([2607:f118::b6] helo=ibctech.ca) by s0.nanog.org with smtp (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <st...@ibctech.ca>) id 1MGhgj-0000qP-Cd for nanog@nanog.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:03:33 +0000 Well, I'm glad I had nothing better to do today other than figure out what is wrong with that particular email server ;) Steve
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
