Cyclops: an open eye to your network (beta release)

2009-03-10 Thread Ricardo Oliveira
Hi, Just to let you know about Cyclops (beta for now), a tool for topology visibility and real-time routing anomaly detection/alerting for service providers and enterprise networks. Cyclops uses real time data from hundreds of vantage points of route-views, ripe-ris, packet clearing house

RE: Redundant Array of Inexpensive ISP's?

2009-03-10 Thread Holmes,David A
The Talari device appears to operate like the old Routescience Pathcontrol BGP load balancer circa 2002 (Routescience is now owned by Avaya I believe). Routescience was able to compile the best path to Internet BGP prefixes so that a web site could connect to multiple 2nd tier ISPs (for circuit cos

Re: Redundant Array of Inexpensive ISP's?

2009-03-10 Thread Jason Dearborn
Good question. I'm also curious if anyone has experience with the Mushroom BBNA device and how it compares to Talari. Due to various premises and telco issues, I've been unable to get anything faster than a DSL connection pulled into a certain branch office. I'm considering any and every alterna

Re: Redundant Array of Inexpensive ISP's?

2009-03-10 Thread Charles Wyble
This seems similiar to Cisco performance routing. See http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps8787/products_ios_protocol_option_home.html for more. Tim Utschig wrote: Talari Networks -- Charles N Wyble char...@thewybles.com (818)280-7059 http://charlesnw.blogspot.com CTO SocalWiFI.net

Redundant Array of Inexpensive ISP's?

2009-03-10 Thread Tim Utschig
[Please reply off-list. I'll summarize back to the list if there is more than a little interest in me doing so.] I'm curious if anyone has experience with products from Talari Networks, or anything similar, and would like to share. Did they live up to your expectations? Caveats? -- - Tim

RE: XO peering.

2009-03-10 Thread Jake Mertel
I did some preliminary tests static-routing some prefixes that were not working earlier over our XO connection and everything seemed fine. I went ahead and turned the session back up, no reports of trouble yet. I'll update if we have any issues. -- Regards, Jake Mertel Nobis Technology Group,

RE: XO peering.

2009-03-10 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 11:41 -0500, Mort, Eric wrote: > We had some hardware issues in San Jose which triggered some other > ugliness. We believe we have the issues mitigated at this time. Folks > still seeing issues are encouraged to hit me up offline. > > Thanks, > > Eric J. Mort > XO Communic

Re: XO peering.

2009-03-10 Thread ChrisSerafin
Our office has XO, and sent an email out complainging about Salesforce.In Chicago. --chris Stefan Molnar wrote: It just cleared up for me. Nice to have a call center complain constantly. Thanks On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Stefa

Re: XO peering.

2009-03-10 Thread Stefan Molnar
It just cleared up for me. Nice to have a call center complain constantly. Thanks On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Stefan Molnar wrote: There was a peering issue in San Jose with XO, that impacted our operations this morning.  But looks

RE: XO peering.

2009-03-10 Thread Mort, Eric
We had some hardware issues in San Jose which triggered some other ugliness. We believe we have the issues mitigated at this time. Folks still seeing issues are encouraged to hit me up offline. Thanks, Eric J. Mort XO Communications Sr. Manager - IP Operations Desk - 314-787-7826 Cell - 314.486

Re: XO peering.

2009-03-10 Thread John Martinez
Do you have the XO ticket number? Jake Mertel wrote: > We had a number of issues in the Seattle area this morning, seemed to be > isolated to traffic transiting via Level 3. We were forced to turn off the > connection, and it's still disabled until we get an update from XO. > > > -- > Regards

RE: XO peering.

2009-03-10 Thread Jake Mertel
We had a number of issues in the Seattle area this morning, seemed to be isolated to traffic transiting via Level 3. We were forced to turn off the connection, and it's still disabled until we get an update from XO. -- Regards, Jake Mertel Nobis Technology Group, L.L.C. Web: http://www.nob

Re: XO peering.

2009-03-10 Thread John Martinez
We saw an issue with Level 3 hand off to XO in Chicago. Stefan Molnar wrote: > > There was a peering issue in San Jose with XO, that impacted our > operations this morning. But looks like a side effect is after the hand > off to NTT. > > Anyone who has an XO link can reach areas insdie NTT? >

Re: XO peering.

2009-03-10 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Stefan Molnar wrote: > There was a peering issue in San Jose with XO, that impacted our operations > this morning.  But looks like a side effect is after the hand off to NTT. > Anyone who has an XO link can reach areas insdie NTT? > As an example our route to Sales

XO peering.

2009-03-10 Thread Stefan Molnar
There was a peering issue in San Jose with XO, that impacted our operations this morning. But looks like a side effect is after the hand off to NTT. Anyone who has an XO link can reach areas insdie NTT? As an example our route to Salesforce /21 is via NTT and it is not happy right now. T