I did some preliminary tests static-routing some prefixes that were not working earlier over our XO connection and everything seemed fine. I went ahead and turned the session back up, no reports of trouble yet. I'll update if we have any issues.
-- Regards, Jake Mertel Nobis Technology Group, L.L.C. Web: http://www.nobistech.net/ Phone: (312) 281-5101 ext. 401 Fax: (808) 356-0417 Mail: 201 West Olive Street Second Floor, Suite 2B Bloomington, IL 61701 -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Oberman [mailto:ober...@es.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 2:41 PM To: Mort, Eric Cc: Jake Mertel; John Martinez; nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: XO peering. On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 11:41 -0500, Mort, Eric wrote: > We had some hardware issues in San Jose which triggered some other > ugliness. We believe we have the issues mitigated at this time. > Folks still seeing issues are encouraged to hit me up offline. > > Thanks, > > Eric J. Mort > XO Communications > Sr. Manager - IP Operations > Desk - 314-787-7826 > Cell - 314.486-9057 > em...@xo.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jake Mertel [mailto:j...@nobistech.net] > Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 11:34 AM > To: John Martinez; nanog@nanog.org > Subject: RE: XO peering. > > We had a number of issues in the Seattle area this morning, seemed to > be isolated to traffic transiting via Level 3. We were forced to turn > off the connection, and it's still disabled until we get an update from XO. > > > -- > Regards, > > Jake Mertel > Nobis Technology Group, L.L.C. > > > > Web: http://www.nobistech.net/ > Phone: (312) 281-5101 ext. 401 > Fax: (808) 356-0417 > > Mail: 201 West Olive Street > Second Floor, Suite 2B > Bloomington, IL 61701 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Martinez [mailto:jmarti...@zero11.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 11:23 AM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: XO peering. > > We saw an issue with Level 3 hand off to XO in Chicago. > > Stefan Molnar wrote: > > > > There was a peering issue in San Jose with XO, that impacted our > > operations this morning. But looks like a side effect is after the > hand > > off to NTT. > > > > Anyone who has an XO link can reach areas insdie NTT? > > > > As an example our route to Salesforce /21 is via NTT and it is not > happy > > right now. > > > > Thanks, > > Stefan > > > > > > > > > No joy from our (AS293) perspective. I still see traffic to XO at SJ black-holed. eqx-sj-rt1-re1> traceroute 198.17.75.45 traceroute to 198.17.75.45 (198.17.75.45), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets ^C Works fine from Ashburn, though. I've pref'ed XO down at SJ until it is working again. -- R. Kevin Oberman Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-Mail: ober...@es.net Phone: +1 510-486-8634
