Hi Sam,
For SNMP Traps, we were using 'Concord TrapExploder'. I'm not sure, if
this is still named that way - it's now more than 1.5 years ago, I'd
been involved in that project.
As we had configured all network elements to send the Traps to both
TrapExploders, we had to de-duplicate the traps on
you can easily configure syslog-ng for forwarding/relaying syslog msgs
to another box
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Sam Stickland
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's looking like running all of our traps and syslog through a couple of
> relay devices (and then onwards to the various NMS's) would be quite a w
Sam Stickland writes:
> It's looking like running all of our traps and syslog through a couple
> of relay devices (and then onwards to the various NMS's) would be
> quite a win for us.
You can try the UDP samplicator:
http://www.switch.ch/network/downloads/tf-tant/samplicator/
(The name indicate
Sorry fot the top-post, but my Treo makes it almost impossible to do otherwise.
The protocols using these reserved, local addresses all use them to embed the
network layer address. AA addresses are used by DECnet and kin while 02 is for
XNS, I seem to recall.
As long as the only addresses use
I've sent your email onto one of them.
-Dennis
On Mar 3, 2009, at March 3,12:45 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Matthew Petach said:
On 3/3/09, Chris Adams wrote:
Can a Yahoo postmaster ping me off list? I've got a couple of
servers
that appear to be mis-categorized.
Contact
The free Kiwi Syslog Server will do this.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Sam Stickland [mailto:sam_mailingli...@spacething.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:52 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: SNMP and syslog forwarders
Hi,
It's looking like running all of our traps and syslog through a
Hi,
It's looking like running all of our traps and syslog through a couple
of relay devices (and then onwards to the various NMS's) would be quite
a win for us.
These relay devices just need to be "dumb" forwarders (we don't require
any filtering or storing, just reflection), but we need an
On (2009-03-03 13:50 -0800), Kevin Oberman wrote:
> This is only a problem if you have multiple systems running DECnet (or
> some other protocol using this) with the same layer 3 address. That
> should never happen, so there should be no duplication.
Why would they need to have same L3 address? T
8 matches
Mail list logo
