On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Chris Mills wrote:
> Anyone seeing phishing alerts for senders in this thread?
>
> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3080/3243440012_d1f6f1e5e7_o.png
>
> -Chris
Yes.
Anyone seeing phishing alerts for senders in this thread?
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3080/3243440012_d1f6f1e5e7_o.png
-Chris
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Henry Linneweh wrote:
> I think they clarify what happened here and are pretty straight up about
> it.
> http://www.nytimes.com/2009/
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 03:11:30PM -0800, Matthew Petach wrote:
> On 1/31/09, aljuhani wrote:
> >
> > Now clicking search results forward to "service unavailable" page within
> > google.
> ...
> > Yahoo! search engine seem to be working fine as looks have no affiliation
> > with google
>
> Tha
On 1/31/09, aljuhani wrote:
>
> Now clicking search results forward to "service unavailable" page within
> google.
...
> Yahoo! search engine seem to be working fine as looks have no affiliation
> with google
That would be correct; the Yahoo Search engine is not affiliated with Google,
and was
I think they clarify what happened here and are pretty straight up about it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/01/technology/internet/01google.html?hp
-henry
From: Peter Beckman
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 6:50:24 AM
Subject: All Google S
On 2009/01/31 04:50 PM Peter Beckman wrote:
This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of "Permission Denied" to
"/interstitial?..." URLs on Google.
Then all my search results got listed as "This site may harm your
computer."
Is Google broken, or is the functionality of listing sites as broke
Sounds like a whitelist of URLs to check against the blacklist would be
appropriate here.
I know that content-filtering company 8e6 had a problem over 2 years ago
with some good well-known sites. Somewhere around that time they hardcoded
categories for the top 500 sites, so that if something slip
FYI, the official explanation has been posted:
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/this-site-may-harm-your-computer-on.html
Damian
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Peter Beckman wrote:
> This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of "Permission Denied" to
> "/interstitial?..." URLs on Goog
On Jan 31, 2009, at 12:19 PM, vijay gill wrote:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Marshall Eubanks > wrote:
On Jan 31, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Peter Beckman wrote:
This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of "Permission Denied" to
"/interstitial?..." URLs on Google.
Then all my search result
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> On Jan 31, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Peter Beckman wrote:
>
> This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of "Permission Denied" to
>> "/interstitial?..." URLs on Google.
>>
>> Then all my search results got listed as "This site may harm your
Washington Post:
Google: This Internet May Harm Your Computer:
A glitch in a computer security program embedded deeply into Google's search
engine briefly prevented users of the popular search engine from visiting any
Web sites turned up in search results this morning. Instead, Google users wer
Thanks for the notice.
Possibly because of the URL contained in the message and/or as appear to be in
html format as composed initially under OE and the copied to another mail
client.
Gmail support notice:
http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=8253
If our system flags a mes
GMail classified this as phishing.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 3:34 PM, aljuhani wrote:
>
> Now clicking search results forward to "service unavailable" page within
> google.
>
> The error message about the site may harm your computer is also displayed
> in Arabic on google Saudi Arabia, www.google.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Marshall Eubanks
wrote:
>
> Who needs monitoring when you can just scan NANOG ?
>
Oh, we're the NA*NOC* now?
- Original Message -
From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian"
To:
Cc: "nanog"
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 18:56
Subject: Re: All Google Search Results: "This site may harm your computer."
| On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 9:22 PM, aljuhani wrote:
| > Google back to norms here, Saudi Arabia.
| >
On Jan 31, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 9:22 PM, aljuhani wrote:
Google back to norms here, Saudi Arabia.
Just wondering, how could something of this nature goes un-
monitored by google !
If it was unmonitored .. what do you think, would it
Done on Indonesia...
S, Somasundaram (Somasundaram) wrote:
google;s back on India too!!!
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Malynn [mailto:ne...@nerdramblingz.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 9:07 PM
To: Murtaza
Cc: S, Somasundaram (Somasundaram); nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: All
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 9:22 PM, aljuhani wrote:
> Google back to norms here, Saudi Arabia.
>
> Just wondering, how could something of this nature goes un-monitored by
> google !
If it was unmonitored .. what do you think, would it have got fixed
within minutes?
--srs
Google back to norms here, Saudi Arabia.
Just wondering, how could something of this nature goes un-monitored by
google !
-aljuhani
- Original Message -
From: "Nathan Malynn"
To: "Murtaza"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 18:37
Subject: Re: All Google Search Results: "This s
google;s back on India too!!!
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Malynn [mailto:ne...@nerdramblingz.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 9:07 PM
To: Murtaza
Cc: S, Somasundaram (Somasundaram); nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: All Google Search Results: "This site may harm your computer."
Goog
Google's back on my connection on Verizon in the Northeast US.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Murtaza wrote:
> fine in Pakistan.
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 8:15 PM, S, Somasundaram (Somasundaram) <
> somasundara...@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
>
>> confirmed..here in India too...
>>
>> ---
The reports I am getting (and my direct observation) is that it is
now fixed.
Marshall
On Jan 31, 2009, at 10:19 AM, cas...@gmail.com wrote:
Is Google broken, or is the functionality of listing sites as
broken,
broken?
It's broken here.
http://petrie.dereferenced.org/~nenolod/googlefails
Now clicking search results forward to "service unavailable" page within google.
The error message about the site may harm your computer is also displayed in
Arabic on google Saudi Arabia, www.google.com.sa
image here: http://ns.mx04.com/google-sa.jpg
looks like the whole database is gone! ...
Yeah, weird here if I'm logged in everything works - if I logout
stuff breaks.. at least to google.ca (southern Ontario as well).
-Original Message-
From: steven.glog...@swisscom.com [mailto:steven.glog...@swisscom.com]
Sent: January 31, 2009 10:16 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: A
Error is fixed and seems to be propogating to resolution
On 1/31/09, Nathan Malynn wrote:
> Not only that, but the gMail logo is missing from my gMail for Domains page.
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Frank wrote:
>> confirmed. same here manila, philippines.
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 1
Just cleared up here in the Bay Area, California.
-wil
On Jan 31, 2009, at 7:16 AM, steven.glog...@swisscom.com wrote:
seems to be a global problem. even here in switzerland... i barely
hear already "the internet is broken":)
-steven
Am 31.01.2009 um 16:02 schrieb "Adam Young"
:
Pete
fine in Pakistan.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 8:15 PM, S, Somasundaram (Somasundaram) <
somasundara...@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> confirmed..here in India too...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank [mailto:fsmend...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 8:36 PM
> To: Adam Youn
>
>> Is Google broken, or is the functionality of listing sites as broken,
>> broken?
>
> It's broken here.
> http://petrie.dereferenced.org/~nenolod/googlefailsit.png
Same here, in Brazil. Weird.
Regards,
Cássio
Not only that, but the gMail logo is missing from my gMail for Domains page.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Frank wrote:
> confirmed. same here manila, philippines.
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Adam Young > wrote:
>
>> Peter Beckman wrote:
>> > This morning whilest Googling, I got a b
Interesting...its happening in Los Angeles using my Verizon Blackberry but not
on the ATT iPhone.
-bb
- Original Message -
From: Frank [fsmend...@gmail.com]
Sent: 01/31/2009 11:06 PM ZE8
To: Adam Young
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: All Google Search Results: "This site may harm your
seems to be a global problem. even here in switzerland... i barely
hear already "the internet is broken":)
-steven
>
> Am 31.01.2009 um 16:02 schrieb "Adam Young" > :
>
>> Peter Beckman wrote:
>>> This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of "Permission Denied"
>>> to
>>> "/interstitial?..."
Yeah, google search is broken everywhere in the world right now.
http://isc.sans.org
On 1/31/09, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> On Jan 31, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Peter Beckman wrote:
>
>> This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of "Permission Denied" to
>> "/interstitial?..." URLs on Google.
>>
>>
confirmed..here in India too...
-Original Message-
From: Frank [mailto:fsmend...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 8:36 PM
To: Adam Young
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: All Google Search Results: "This site may harm your computer."
confirmed. same here manila, philippines.
Considering the lingering Comcast gig w/the SEC, I can't see that flying
well. (Unless they manage to pull a PUC/DTE thing like VZ has done in the
past, and manage to get exec(s) placed as commisioner(s)).
Because of Google's insanely disproportionate market domination, I don't
see them staying u
Looks like they are experiencing some "internal" issue.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 9:04 AM, aljuhani wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Just trying to search for website then presented with all search each have
> under the text "This site may harm your computer", when any of search result
> clicked that lead to a go
On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 09:50 -0500, Peter Beckman wrote:
> This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of "Permission Denied" to
> "/interstitial?..." URLs on Google.
>
> Then all my search results got listed as "This site may harm your
> computer."
>
> Is Google broken, or is the functionality o
Its spilling over into email processing at gmail now and marking as spam
messages that have links that show bad on google search. Interesting
Saturday morning.
cheers
Jeff
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> Also for NANOG :
>
> Warning - visiting this web site may ha
confirmed. same here manila, philippines.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Adam Young wrote:
> Peter Beckman wrote:
> > This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of "Permission Denied" to
> > "/interstitial?..." URLs on Google.
> >
> > Then all my search results got listed as "This site may
Hi.
Just trying to search for website then presented with all search each have
under the text "This site may harm your computer", when any of search result
clicked that lead to a google page headed with "This site may harm your
computer" and no further option to proceed.
I even tried entering
Also for NANOG :
Warning - visiting this web site may harm your computer!
Suggestions:
• Return to the previous page and pick another result.
• Try another search to find what you're looking for.
Or you can continue to http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog44/ at your
own risk. For
Classic :D
http://i39.tinypic.com/ac9qp.jpg
-r
From: Wil Schultz [wschu...@bsdboy.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 9:56 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: All Google Search Results: "This site may harm your computer."
Yup, google's gone craaazy.
http://
On Jan 31, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Peter Beckman wrote:
This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of "Permission Denied" to
"/interstitial?..." URLs on Google.
Then all my search results got listed as "This site may harm your
computer."
Yes, I got it for a search link to wikipedia and to my ow
Peter Beckman wrote:
> This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of "Permission Denied" to
> "/interstitial?..." URLs on Google.
>
> Then all my search results got listed as "This site may harm your
> computer."
>
> Is Google broken, or is the functionality of listing sites as broken,
> broken
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 09:50:24AM -0500, Peter Beckman wrote:
> This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of "Permission Denied" to
> "/interstitial?..." URLs on Google.
>
> Then all my search results got listed as "This site may harm your
> computer."
>
> Is Google broken, or is the functional
> This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of "Permission Denied" to
> "/interstitial?..." URLs on Google.
>
> Then all my search results got listed as "This site may harm your
> computer."
>
> Is Google broken, or is the functionality of listing sites as broken,
> broken?
I thought I was go
Yup, google's gone craaazy.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3089/3241488702_9a9a994f07.jpg
-wil
On Jan 31, 2009, at 6:50 AM, Peter Beckman wrote:
This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of "Permission Denied" to
"/interstitial?..." URLs on Google.
Then all my search results got listed as
This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of "Permission Denied" to
"/interstitial?..." URLs on Google.
Then all my search results got listed as "This site may harm your
computer."
Is Google broken, or is the functionality of listing sites as broken,
broken?
http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/423476
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 4:16 PM, marc wrote:
> sorry again just for the records and web NANOG archives
>
You want to archive spam then news.admin.net-abuse.sightings is down
the hall, three doors to your left.
-srs
sorry again just for the records and web NANOG archives
second worth enemy :
Von: Discount Shopper
Datum: 31. Januar 2009 11:36:15 MEZ
An: m...@let.de
Betreff: Wal-Mart Notice: You've been selected to receive a $1000
Wal-Mart GiftCard
Antwort an:
Return-Path:
Received: from mx2.mail.vrmd
Besides the other solutions listed, you can also take a look at Arbor
(formerly Ellacoya) and Sandvine.
Rubens
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Bruce Grobler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know of any Shaping appliances to shape customers based on IP,
> allow for a quota per IP and qos mechan
On 2009/01/30 07:56 PM bert hubert wrote:
In general, the Linux packet shaping infrastructure is overly powerful, if
very weakly documented - despite the LARTC efforts.
"Overly powerful" is a strong word. Sure it has countless poorly
documented features, but then it fails at even the the most
51 matches
Mail list logo
