On 2008/10/17 06:19 AM Scott Doty wrote:
So please, if you have anything further to say, either email me
directly, or I suggest trying the nanog-futures list. Thank you.
Abandon all hope ye who enter this thread.
Dean Anderson wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Alan Hannan wrote:
Is truth an actual defense to your assertions?
Yes. Everything in this message is true, and can be proved to a
certainty.
Please, sir: I suggest that your messages might contain more that a bit of
quixotism...
Right o
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Dean Anderson wrote:
> > contains "So Harris banned me from NANOG." . Not sure if thats the
> > meeting, the NANOG list, or one of the NANOG/Merit other lists.
>
> The list, I don't know if this applies to meetings.
The Jan 2000 ban also stopped my participation in RADB. Ma
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Alan Hannan wrote:
> Is truth an actual defense to your assertions?
Yes. Everything in this message is true, and can be proved to a
certainty.
--Dean
> Dean Anderson wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Scott Doty wrote:
> >
> >
> >> First, the good news: so
http://www.iadl.org/sorbs/sorbs-story.html
For an account of Mr. Sullivan's assertions that IP blocks used by AV8
Internet are hijacked.
I'm going to put up a page fairly soon about Mr. Vixie's changing
support of SORBS. It seems that many people don't like SORBS, and to
those people, Vixie says
Since you so many facts wrong, a response is necessary.
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> I actually was thinking of the ARIN list that you had the temporary
> ban on :
>
> http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-discuss/2008-February/000897.html
I don't have a page on this be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Glen Kent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apologies in advance since this is off-topic. However, posting in on
> nanog since i am confident that we will have some experts who would be
> able to guide me here.
>
> I want to study the standards (RFC equivalent) for s
Hi,
Apologies in advance since this is off-topic. However, posting in on
nanog since i am confident that we will have some experts who would be
able to guide me here.
I want to study the standards (RFC equivalent) for sending and
receiving SMSs. Any ideas on what kind of protocol runs between a
m
Please consider to contribute to and/or forward to the appropriate groups the
following opportunity to submit and publish original scientific results.
Apologies for cross-postings.
== ICNS 2009 | Call for Papers ===
CALL FOR PAPERS, TUTORIALS, PANELS
ICNS 2009, The Fifth
- Forwarded Message -
From: "Joe Provo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 1:54:15 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [NANOG-announce] New NANOG Program Committee
In its last scheduled meeting, the NANOG Steering Committee selected
a new Prog
- Forwarded Message -
From: "Joe Provo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:33:38 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [NANOG-announce] New NANOG Steering Committee
The new NANOG SC held its first meeting on Tuesday evening of
NANOG44. One o
- "Rodney Joffe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jon Postel left us. A vacuum still unfilled.
I thought I felt a ripple in the Force, today.
It was as if 4.2 billion IP addresses cried out, then were silenced.
Requiescat in Pace.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
3845 is plenty powerful, its the equivalent of an NPE-400 basically,
but you should plan on 512MB minimum with full BGP, so that you make
sure you have room for other things as well on the router.
Its not linear of course, since there is alot of redundant information
with multiple BGP feeds
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: "Alan Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
How many (if any) full BGP feeds should a 3845 with 256M memory normally be
expected to take?
---
You might try on a cisco specific list like cisco-nsp.
scott
Agree. Our 2821 with 2 full views running 12.4 mainline and 768MB ram
has 427 free. So using 340 for OS and tables...
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 4:04 PM
To: Alan Hetzel
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: 384
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Alan Hetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How many (if any) full BGP feeds should a 3845 with 256M memory normally be
> expected to take?
>
Less than one? :)
How many (if any) full BGP feeds should a 3845 with 256M memory normally be
expected to take?
It looks like ATT has delegated some networks to our DNS servers. We
need to get those changed and have no idea on who the contacts are. Are
there any ATT dns admins that can contact me offline?
Thanks,
Patrick Felt
It's a good point that you brought up.
Even though we already have IPv6 P2P (Nathan's post explains this in
more detail), it would still be quite interesting to provide IPv6 as a
higher class of traffic within service provider networks.
Quite likely 6to4 relays and native IPv6 traffic is be
Jon Postel left us. A vacuum still unfilled.
http://www.isi.edu/div7/people/postel.home/
20 matches
Mail list logo
