Marc Manthey wrote:
>>> i am not a math genious and i am talking about for example serving
>>>
>>> 10.000 unicast streams and
>>> 10.000 multicast streams
>>>
>>> would the multicast streams more efficient or lets say , would you
>>> need more machines to server 10.000 unicast streams ?
>
>
> he
>> i am not a math genious and i am talking about for example serving
>>
>> 10.000 unicast streams and
>> 10.000 multicast streams
>>
>> would the multicast streams more efficient or lets say , would you
>> need more machines to server 10.000 unicast streams ?
hello all ,
>>
> For 1 concurr
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Marc Manthey wrote:
> i am not a math genious and i am talking about for example serving
>
> 10.000 unicast streams and
> 10.000 multicast streams
>
> would the multicast streams more efficient or lets say , would you
> need more machines to server 10.000 unicast streams ?
F
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> NNTP, the historical firehose protocol, just floods it out
> to everyone who hasn't seen it yet but actually, the consumers of
> an NNTP feed have been set up statically in advance. And this static
> setup does include knowledge of ISP's network topology, and knowledge
>
> > I'm wondering how much content is used TiVo style, not in
> real time,
> > but fairly soon thereafter. It might make sense to
> multicast feeds to
> > local caches so when people actually want stuff, it doesn't
> come all
> > the way across the net.
>
> I think the good folks at Akamai
5 matches
Mail list logo
