imization of
+ color and ink? :)
Are there any features of the new version that you use and/or like?
If not, why not simply downgrade to the version that you were using
before?
--
++ Tim Lupfer ++ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++
++ http://www.rootdown.net/~timl ++
++ 0x4905183C @ pgpkeys.mit.edu ++
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
> Steve Cooper [Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 11:08:13AM +]:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 08:58:12AM -0600, Charles Curley decreed:
> [snip]
> > If you have the cygwin tools, you might see if the regular mutt
> > tarball will compile there.
> >
> > http://www.cygwin.com
> [snip]
>
> FWIW - Cygwin a
hey, did anyone ever happen to come up with an answer for the \012
1.3.24 weirdness? I finally decided to upgrade some of my machines,
and little things like random \012's on my screen bother me.
e.g.
[-- End of PGP output --]
\012
[-- The following data is signed --]
\012
--
tim l
.
thanks, worked like a charm.
--
tim lupfer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
familiarity breeds contempt--and children.
--mark twain's notebook.
ar and unamerican? that's CRAZY!
my entire morning has been ruined, thanks.
Seriously though, tolerance is a good thing, we don't need any
mutt-user-on-mutt-user violence for the outlook-run news media to
pick up on and make example of.
[...]
--
tim lupfer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
l? if yes what shud i do?
> No, you can get postfix ;-)
or you can just use sendmail! trying adding "set envelope_from" in
your .muttrc. I've never quite figured out why people loathe
sendmail so.. especially when all it's being use for is injecting
mail.
--
tim lupfer
On Dec 19 at 04:21PM giorgian wrote:
[...]
> now, is there a way to tell mutt to put received messages in folders
> according to some matching rules?
if you're just dealing with mailing lists, getmail will likely
suffice. you can find it at freshmeat, and it's easy-as-pie to
con
maybe i'm just being an idiot, but what is mutt 1.5.0?
i was not even aware that there was a 1.4 branch yet (a truth to
which i will still attest).
--
timothy lupfer
http://sadlittleboy.com
* thus spaketh Thomas Dickey (Mar 12 at 06:46PM):
> Perhaps the configure script didn't find ncurses (which is a port), or
> was fooled into trying to use the NetBSD curses library (not recommended).
...i'm jumping in a bit late on this conversation; but I am using
mutt with netbsd curses with n
* thus spaketh Ken Weingold (Mar 12 at 04:35PM):
> Well with either no path to curses on the command line or using
> what I found on the system, I get the problems. There is a mutt
> 1.3.25i installed on the system, and mutt -v says 'System: NetBSD
> 1.5.2 (i386) [using ncurses 5.2]'. Any way t
* thus spaketh Shawn McMahon (Mar 20 at 12:48PM):
> begin quoting what David T-G said on Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 12:39:23PM -0500:
>> HTH & HAND and none of this is tested :-)
> Acronymize that last one. :-)
i'm not sure where else you can acquire it, but /usr/games/wtf that
ships with netbsd i
* thus spaketh William Park (Mar 24 at 04:45PM):
> Put
> image/gif; xv %s
> image/jpeg; xv %s
> in your ~/.mailcap
based on my faith in xv to render anything even remotely an image, i
have the following entry:
image/*; xv %s
--
timothy lupfer
http://sadlittleboy.com
* thus spaketh Rob 'Feztaa' Park (Mar 25 at 12:31PM):
>> I don't know that I can let you get away with that. Said in the
>> correct accent - in fact, one of German, Switzerdutch, and most
>> Scandinavian accents, Jussi sounds reasonably masculine to me.
> Well, it sounds an awful lot like "Jessy
* thus spaketh Sven Guckes (Mar 28 at 03:37AM):
> but - is there a way I can just *hide*
> the pgp sig *completely* from view?
mutt reads mail--stripping pgp sigs is the job of procmail or the
like <-- sorry, couldn't resist :P
--
timothy lupfer
http://sadlittleboy.com
14 matches
Mail list logo
