Different mail accounts

2000-02-06 Thread Wouter Hanegraaff
Hi, I have several mail accounts, for very distinct purposes. If i reply to a message, I would like From: to list the To: address of the message I replied to. Therefore, I have set reverse_name, but it doesn't seem to work. Or is reverse_name something else? Another issue is, that when I compos

Re: Changing X-Sender header

2000-02-10 Thread Wouter Hanegraaff
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 08:02:40AM -0800, Claus Assmann wrote: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2000, Lars Hecking wrote: > > > The Sender: header is written by the MTA (eg. sendmail). > > sendmail does not generate a "Sender:" header. > Which MTA does it? Postfix, if I set the From: address manually with ed

Re: Changing X-Sender header

2000-02-10 Thread Wouter Hanegraaff
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 11:02:37AM +0100, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 08:02:40AM -0800, Claus Assmann wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 09, 2000, Lars Hecking wrote: > > > > > The Sender: header is written by the MTA (eg. sendmail). > > > >

Off topic: Fake bounce

2000-02-29 Thread Wouter Hanegraaff
Hi, I want to be able to send fake bounces. Although faking a bounce is not really what you are supposed to do with mail, there are enough cases in which this is perfectly appropriate. I guess all that is needed is a small script which reads a mail from standard input and generates a fake bounce

Re: Off topic: Fake bounce

2000-02-29 Thread Wouter Hanegraaff
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 04:02:32PM +, Lars Hecking wrote: > > You mean, "fake bounce" as in: created by yourself, not by the MTA? Yes. So I don't want any automatic bouncing. I don't get that much spam. But when I do, it will end up in my inbox. I want to be able to just pipe it to a fake b

unmy_hdr doesn't seem to work

2000-03-26 Thread Wouter Hanegraaff
Hi, I want to use folder hooks to set a reply-to in certain folders. So I have folder-hook . unmy_hdr Reply-To folder-hook special my_hdr Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] When I enter the folder special and write mail, the reply_to is set correctly to [EMAIL PROTECTED] But when I change back to ano

Re: unmy_hdr doesn't seem to work

2000-03-26 Thread Wouter Hanegraaff
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 01:44:11AM +0100, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote: > Hi, > > I want to use folder hooks to set a reply-to in certain folders. > > So I have > folder-hook . unmy_hdr Reply-To > folder-hook special my_hdr Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I figured it out, I have

Locale settings and LANG

2000-08-11 Thread Wouter Hanegraaff
When no LC_CTYPE or LANG variable is set, mutt displays special characters like ë, é, £, correctly. But when LANG=C is set and LC_CTYPE are unset, they are not. This is a bit strange, because when LANG and LC_CTYPE are unset, programs usually use the default locale settings, which should be equal

Re: using mutt from a dynamic IP PPP connection

1999-04-14 Thread Wouter Hanegraaff
On Mon, Apr 12, 1999 at 05:04:03PM +, Jeremy M. Dolan wrote: > i think a dynamic IP PPP connection is a fairly common setup, so im hoping > someone here has run across these same problems... I had these problems as well... I figured out how to do this with sendmail, and I even documented it.

Configuring sendmail genericstable for dynamic IP [Was: Using mutt from a dynamic IP PPP connection]

1999-04-16 Thread Wouter Hanegraaff
I received mail from several mutt-users, who are interested in my document on how to configure the sendmail genericstable for use with dynamic ip connections. The genericstable is very useful for everyone who uses dial up internet connections and sendmail. Since it's really off topic and since

Re: Return Address problem

1999-04-23 Thread Wouter Hanegraaff
On Thu, Apr 22, 1999 at 07:04:00PM -0400, Hal Burgiss wrote: > Using mutt .95 with sendmail on a standalone home box. My mail headers are > apparently showing 'sender' as $user@$HOSTNAME. Some mail servers ignore this, > but others complain -- 'BadReturnPath' or '(mail may be forged)' -- and some

Mutt detects new mail in old mailbox

1999-07-05 Thread Wouter Hanegraaff
When I browse through my mailboxes with c.., one of the boxes that is supposed to have new mail doen't have new mail at all. This happens very often. When I am in that folder, mutt even sometimes explicitely tells me there's new mail in that box. For all I know, this happens only with one very sma

Re: Mutt detects new mail in old mailbox

1999-07-06 Thread Wouter Hanegraaff
On Tue, Jul 06, 1999 at 11:07:41AM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote: > You probably have your mail on a filesystem that doesn't update the atime of > your mailboxes. If you are using linux/ext2, keep your mail on a filesystem > that is not mounted "noatime". Strange... One would think mutt and linux/e