Hi there, I'm new to mutt being a long-time Pine fanatic. Just
because I was bored today I switched to mutt (don't ask why, I'm not
sure myself) and so far I'm somewhat impressed.
I search the archive and couldn't find a satisfactory answer to this
question... I used the Pine roles somewhat exc
On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 03:54:10PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> > Just because I was bored today I switched to mutt (don't ask why, I'm
> > not sure myself) and so far I'm somewhat impressed.
>
> You will find better reasons once to get used to mutt, I'm sure :-)
So far so good... I do like th
(209.115.163.66)
by nylon.rope.net with SMTP; 19 Jun 2000 05:48:41 -
Received: (from vdanen@localhost)
by devel.danen.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) id e5J5m3a09047
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 23:48:03 -0600
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 23:48:03 -0600
From: Vincent Danen <[EM
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 10:27:05PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > I insert a my_hdr Return-Path:... statement into the .muttrc for
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] but when it bounced back for the second
> > time it showed the Return-Path as [EMAIL PROTECTED] (where
> > devel.danen.net is the hostname for
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 11:34:45PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Vincent Danen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 19 Jun 2000:
> > Hmmm... I use Qmail as my SMTP server on my server, but not on this
> > machine. Maybe I should use Qmail on this machine also...
>
>
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 07:49:49AM +0200, Frank Derichsweiler wrote:
> > I insert a my_hdr Return-Path:... statement into the .muttrc for
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] but when it bounced back for the second
> > time it showed the Return-Path as [EMAIL PROTECTED] (where
> > devel.danen.net is the hostnam
I just upgraded to 1.2i and the colors are all whacked out. Has this
happened to anyone else? I compiled with slang support instead of
ncurses and the colors worked ok in the 1.0.1 RPMs from Mandrake, but
the colors in this one are just horrible and nothing is coming out
right... any ideas?
--
Now that I've upgraded, mutt tells me my /var/spool/mail/vdanen
mailbox is readonly but with 1.0.1 it didn't. Did I mess something
up on the compile? Any ideas would be appreciated.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net
Freezer Burn BBS: telnet://bbs.freezer-burn.or
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 09:52:55PM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> > Hi there. I can't seem to figure this one out. It's like sendmail
> > is re-writing the Return-Path header and it's making my posts to some
> > mailing lists bounce for some reason.
> [...]
>
> Sounds like you need to fix you
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:04:02PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Vincent Danen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 20 Jun 2000:
> > I just upgraded and have run into a few problems (see other
> > messages). How would I use the envelope thing?
> >
> > set
Is mutt_dotlock supposed to be setgid (sorry Mikko, I meant setgid
nor setuid in other message)? I changed it to 755 and I still get
read-only permission on /var/spool/mail/vdanen which has -rw-rw
permissions and is owned by vdanen.mail.
I can't delete any messages in my inbox with the new m
FYI, this may help track down the problems. I think it has something
to do with mutt_dotlock or else how I compiled it. This is how I
compiled mutt... maybe I need to add more stuff (like the locking
stuff?) to configure?
./configure --prefix=/usr --with-sharedir=/etc --sysconfdir=/etc
--with-d
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:46:06PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> > FYI, this may help track down the problems. I think it has something
> > to do with mutt_dotlock or else how I compiled it. This is how I
> > compiled mutt... maybe I need to add more stuff (like the locking
> > stuff?) to con
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:43:52PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> > Dotlocking will create a file /var/spool/mail/vdanen.lock.
> > In order to do this, mutt_dotlock needs write access to
> > that directory, which is normally enabled by making
> > mutt_dotlock setgid mail.
>
> To illustrate thin
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 03:08:14PM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> > Is mutt_dotlock supposed to be setgid (sorry Mikko, I meant setgid
>
> Yes, it needs to be setgid to the group that owns the mail spool
> directory. That's the whole point of it. Dotlocking in some
> configurations needs to be s
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:41:51PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> > I changed it to 755 and I still get read-only
> > permission on /var/spool/mail/vdanen which has
> > -rw-rw permissions and is owned by vdanen.mail.
>
> The important thing are the permissions of the
> /var/spool/mail _dire
Ok... I've still got some problems making my RPM for mutt and I'm not
sure what's causing it. I built mutt manually and then I built it
with the exact same options for the RPM but I get two totally
different outputs. The first is from the manual install and the
second is from the RPM install
-r
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 03:27:43PM -0400, Bob Bell wrote:
> > Ok... I've still got some problems making my RPM for mutt and I'm not
> > sure what's causing it. I built mutt manually and then I built it
> > with the exact same options for the RPM but I get two totally
> > different outputs. The
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 03:35:42PM -0400, Rob Reid wrote:
> > Ok... I've still got some problems making my RPM for mutt and I'm not
> > sure what's causing it. I built mutt manually and then I built it
> > with the exact same options for the RPM but I get two totally
> > different outputs. The
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 09:45:22PM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> > -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1262377 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/mutt*
> > -rwxr-sr-x1 root mail36607 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock*
> > -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 6668 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/muttb
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 02:11:05PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> > Ok... I've still got some problems making my RPM for mutt and I'm not
> > sure what's causing it. I built mutt manually and then I built it
> > with the exact same options for the RPM but I get two totally
> > different outputs
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 07:43:23PM -0700, AG wrote:
> > Anyone know why there's such a discrepancy? I think the RPM might be
> > stripping the binaries but I don't know if that would make such a big
> > difference... Doing a mutt -v on both the RPM and manual binaries
> > produces the same outp
Sorry if this isn't the right place to post this but I'm sure I got
this little code snippet from a mutt-related website...
I've got this in my .procmailrc file:
## Nuke duplicate messages
:0 Wh: msgid.lock
| formail -D 8192 msgid.cache
## Create backup cache of 100 most recent messages
:0 c
ba
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 12:00:28PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> >## Create backup cache of 100 most recent messages
> >:0 c
> >backup
> > :0 ic
> > | cd $PMDIR && rm -f dummy `ls -t msg.* | sed -e 1,100d`
> >
> >But it doesn't seem to be working properly (the backup part). I've
> >go
Well, after two frustrating days I got it all working! Colors work
now that I'm using ncurses (5.0 for those interested), and the
readonly inbox problem is also gone due to this small problem with
the RPM specfile:
%files
%defattr(-,root,root)
That's what was messing up the permissions on mutt_
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 09:56:38AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > ## Nuke duplicate messages
> > :0 Wh: msgid.lock
> > | formail -D 8192 msgid.cache
> >
> > ## Create backup cache of 100 most recent messages
> > :0 c
> > backup
> > :0 ic
> > | cd $PMDIR && rm -f dummy `ls -t msg.* | sed -e
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 12:29:43PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> >No, I'm using the mbox format. Does this mean I can't do this then?
> >Is there something similar to this for the mbox format?
>
> Hack together something out of grep, awk and sed :) Or look for 'grepmail'
> on freshmea
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 12:24:35PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > Hmmm... ok... backup was actually a mailbox file, so I deleted it
> > and made a directory named backup and changed $PMDIR to
> > $PMDIR/backup.
>
> As long as the first and second recipe both have the same expression,
> and it
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 07:58:03AM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote:
> > > > Ok... I've still got some problems making my RPM for mutt and I'm not
> > > > sure what's causing it. I built mutt manually and then I built it
> > > > with the exact same options for the RPM but I get two totally
> > > >
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 06:16:07AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> % Sorry if this isn't the right place to post this but I'm sure I got
> % this little code snippet from a mutt-related website...
> %
> % I've got this in my .procmailrc file:
> %
> % ## Nuke duplicate messages
> ...
> % ## Create bac
How do I undelete messages? When I try to go back to a deleted
message, mutt won't let me... I can't move the arrow onto it. I see
on the menu bar at the bottom there is an undelete command, but it
looks to work only on the highlighted message (which is never a
deleted message because I can neve
On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 02:00:46AM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> > How do I undelete messages? When I try to go back to a deleted
> > message, mutt won't let me... I can't move the arrow onto it. I see
>
> Type in the message number to jump to any message, or use the
> and bindings to scrol
On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 12:10:02AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > How do I undelete messages? When I try to go back to a deleted
> > message, mutt won't let me... I can't move the arrow onto it. I see
> > on the menu bar at the bottom there is an undelete command, but it
> > looks to work only
On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 11:52:49PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > Thanks. Now, is there any way to bind the arrow keys to use the J/K
> > action instead of the j/k action? That would be really nice...
>
> Sure.
>
> bind index previous-entry
> bind index next-entry
>
> You may possibl
I've finally taken the plunge and put qmail on my personal system after
having used it on my server forever. I've got a rather strange mix
here and some odd errors...
This is what my log looks like when I send out a message:
@400039ac8fb70cda2b34 new msg 190666
@400039ac8fb70cdaa834 inf
On Wed Aug 30, 2000 at 08:11:51AM +0200, Frank Derichsweiler wrote:
> > The hostname on this machine is devel.danen.net, but I don't understand
> > where this "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> > stuff is coming from. Any ideas?
> >
> > I'm calling qmail like
On Wed Aug 30, 2000 at 12:27:45AM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
> | The hostname on this machine is devel.danen.net, but I don't understand
> | where this "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> | stuff is coming from. Any ideas?
>
> /var/qmail/control files
Nothing
On Wed Aug 30, 2000 at 07:32:35AM +, Jim Breton wrote:
> > I'm calling qmail like this:
> >
> > set sendmail="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject"
>
> Hmm.. I'm not sure where all that stuff is coming from... but (someone
> correct me if I'm wrong) I don't believe you can use the typical
> sendmail
38 matches
Mail list logo
