Re: Newsgroups

2001-07-13 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
In a message dated Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 04:06:50PM -0700, Ryan Cook wrote: > OK...I don't see it anywhere in the man pages or the Mutt manual. Is > there a way to subscribe to newsgroups through the use of Mutt...or > view newsgroups in Mutt...like if I want to sign up for > alt.comp.os.linux or

mostly-generic mutt hooks

2001-08-07 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
Greetings. I'd like to set up a folder hook so that when entering a folder that looks like "=bar/foo", my From is set to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" While I know I can do this pretty easily with one folder hook per folder, I wonder if I can use regex to simplify it. For example, something like folder

Colorizing Headers full width

2001-10-20 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
Hello! I have some rules in my .muttrc to colorize headers. Here's an example: color hdrdefault brightwhite blue This colorizes the header only until the end of the string. This is pretty ugly when the string is, say, 30 characters long. I'd like to make it colori

Colorizing Headers full width

2001-10-20 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
Hello! I have some rules in my .muttrc to colorize headers. Here's an example: color hdrdefault brightwhite blue This colorizes the header only until the end of the string. This is pretty ugly when the string is, say, 30 characters long. I'd like to make it colori

coloring the indicator

2001-10-25 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
YACQ: I'd really like to colorize my indicator. I no longer use %Z in my index_format, and use index coloring to pass along the flag-info I care about. Unfortunately, that means that I can't tell what's up with the message currently under the indicator. Any hints on using patterns to hilight th

Re: Browser problem on text/html

2001-11-02 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 06:43:58PM -0900, Tim Johnson wrote: > When I receive an email in text/html, I do the following > press 'v' and then the key. > > I then receive the following error message: > sh: syntax error near unexpected token `openURL('' > sh: -c: line 1: `netscape -remo

Re: Why use pgp with mutt?

2002-01-04 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 10:54:46PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote: > Hi folks > I've been seeing 'pgp signitures' and suchlike since joining this group > and I'm a bit baffled. > Why the need to encrypt harmless text? > It looks interesting and I wondered if you might share some opinions and > pointer

Re: signed emails, why ?

2002-01-07 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:52:25PM +, Steve Kennedy wrote: > Why does everyone send signed emails to the list, is it always > necessary ? > It slows reading down, and digests dont look so nice ... > I can understand that certain things should be signed, but it > seems more than not are now sig

Re: naming the pgp sig attachment.

2002-01-08 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 08:01:47AM -0500, Walt Mankowski wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 01:57:47PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote: > > Is there a way of giving the gpg signiture a default name like > > 'nicks_electronic_signiture' or something equally as clear? > > > > On some clients it's coming up

Re: available MDA's: are you satisfied?

2002-01-24 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 02:58:20AM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > looks like there's just two MDA's in use: Procmail, and Maildrop. Both > have their fine (and not so fine) points, which I'll summarize briefly > (YMMV): Consider perl's Mail::Audit module. -- rjbs

Re: how much CPU?

2002-01-27 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 07:49:54AM -0800, Ken Weingold wrote: > I have one mailbox that has A LOT of messages in it, as in quite a few > thousand. It is in mbox format. For mutt to open it as quickly as > possible, it is dependent on processor speed? I moved my mail to a It's dependent on a lo

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-27 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:33:36AM -0500, Shawn McMahon wrote: > > Think of it as like a Linux distribution. Linux is the OS, RedHat or > Debian is the distribution. Saying "Solaris" is like saying "Debian", > only slower and less free. :-) Except that Linux is only the kernel. Linux + GNU

Re: OT: OS / distro / kernel

2002-03-28 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 07:47:29AM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote: > Mike Schiraldi wrote: > > > > Except that Linux is only the kernel. Linux + GNU + some other files and > > > > configuration is the OS. That, plus some applications is the distribution. > > > > > > You're wrong. > > > > How is h

IMAP Subscription and Mailboxes

2002-04-03 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
Hello! Is there a way to tell mutt to either: a) use my IMAP subscriptions as my 'mailboxes' (to check for new mail) b) tell mutt to consider all mailboxes as 'mailboxes' I don't like having to list all of my 50+ folders, to which procmail writes, just to have it tell me if there's new mail in

Re: IMAP Subscription and Mailboxes

2002-04-04 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:00:50PM -0500, David T-G wrote: > % Is there a way to tell mutt to either: > % a) use my IMAP subscriptions as my 'mailboxes' (to check for new mail) > % b) tell mutt to consider all mailboxes as 'mailboxes' > No, not really. :-( > % I don't like having to list all o

Re: IMAP Subscription and Mailboxes

2002-04-04 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 07:57:51AM -0500, David T-G wrote: > ...and then Ricardo SIGNES said... > % My procmail rules use regexes to generate folder names on the fly! > > Hmmm... So have procmail generate the folder name and then hand it off > to a script which checks a list

Re: OT: procmail, \/, and mailing lists.

2002-04-26 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 11:48:45PM -0600, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > I know I could do something like this (untested): > > :0: > * ^TO_\/.*@qux\.com > ~/mail/$MATCH > > But, the problem being that the foldernames would be the actual address > of the list ('[EMAIL PROTECTED]' instead of 'foo', wh

Re: Please help me with getting a thread view

2002-05-10 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 10:15:21AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > when in a folder. Can someone please tell me how to get the threaded view where >arrows are used > to indicate a thread. I have seen some example pictures on the web, but I cannot >find the appropriate > settings in the muttr

Form Letters

2002-05-23 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
Does anyone have a good method for writing form letters with mutt? Ideally, I'd like to have a folder that acts like drafts, but doesn't store "To" information and doesn't delete messages once they're sent. Maybe the best thing is to make a keybinding that changes the value of $postponed and som

Re: [mutt-users] Form Letters

2002-05-23 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 11:45:31AM -0400, Tim Kennedy wrote: > I just store them as dot-files. in my home directory, and using vim as > my editor just read them in with :r .file. I thought I might do that -- but it'd be nice to have the postponed-style choose for form letters. :) -- rjbs msg

Re: Form Letters

2002-05-23 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 10:45:46AM -0500, David T-G wrote: > ...and then Ricardo SIGNES said... > % Ideally, I'd like to have a folder that acts like drafts, but doesn't store > % "To" information and doesn't delete messages once they're sent. > > Ha

Re: Form Letters

2002-05-23 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
My solution (JEEZ! I love mutt!): macro index f c=forms\r folder-hook . bind index display-message folder-hook . bind index noop folder-hook =forms bind index resend-message folder-hook =forms

Re: Form Letters

2002-05-23 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 11:19:02AM -0500, David T-G wrote: > ...and then Ricardo SIGNES said... > % folder-hook . bind index display-message > % folder-hook . bind index noop > > Quite good of you to clean up after yourself, but how

RFE: regex backrefs

2002-07-31 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
I know this has been brought up before, but I just thought I'd voice my deep desire: mutt should be able to have backrefs to its regexen. If I get a 'vote' in future development, this is how I would cast it. My C is crappy, or I'd shut up and code it. Imagine the power available in something a

Re: RFE: regex backrefs

2002-07-31 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 05:08:25PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > my deep desire: mutt should be able to have backrefs to its regexen. > > this reminds me: how hard would it be to make mutt use libpcre? And, how much would it slow down / bloat up mutt, if at all? -- rjbs msg29997/pg

Re: RFE: regex backrefs

2002-08-01 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 03:57:13PM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote: > > While this might look simple, it's more difficult to implement than you > might think. Why? Becuse the regexp here is not just one regular No, I know how difficult it is. ;) > At any rate, your example above can be solved as

Re: most commonly used regex lib for awk/frep/mutt/sed?

2002-08-01 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 01:47:37PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Erik Christiansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-01 07:48]: > > While procmail seems to be out on a long plank in the > > middle of a swamp, it would be cosmically empowering to be > > able to move between mutt, vim, awk, and grep with

Re: most commonly used regex lib for awk/frep/mutt/sed?

2002-08-01 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 08:22:36AM -0400, Ricardo SIGNES wrote: > > echo >> ~/.muttrc set pcre_acknowledge=on # to avoid PCRE warnings on startup Ok, so I don't know how to call echo, and s/=on/yes/ Still, you get the picture. -- rjbs msg30054/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: New mail to list.

2002-09-17 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:20:09PM +0200, Alex Polite wrote: > How do I start composing a new message to a mailing list? What I > usually do now is push "L" for list-reply the remove the body and > appropriate headers. That sounds like a bigger hassle than just typing 'm' (or the key to which y

at last message

2002-09-19 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
The following lines are in my .vimrc: fcc-hook . =sent/`date +%Y/%m` macro index \\ Wnk\$s=spam/`date +%Y/%m`\r macro pager \\ \$s=spam/`date +%Y/%m`\r The idea is that \ marks a message as spam by saving it to the current spam folder. I must commit my changes to the IMAP Server before saving t

Re: Returning to the mail spool

2002-09-19 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 01:55:33AM +0100, kevin lyda wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 01:50:30AM +0100, Anthony Edwards wrote: > > Heh. I don't want to go to my inbox; I want to go to my *mail spool*. > > I don't think it can be done (without quitting and staring Mutt again), > > but I'd like to

Re: at last message

2002-09-20 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 10:20:18AM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > * Ricardo SIGNES <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-19 20:46 -0400]: > [...] > > I can't find a way to force not to move, nor can I find a way > > to get "back to where I was," taking into ac

Re: Auto Reply?

2002-09-25 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 10:04:15AM -0500, Fred Dech wrote: > hi. > > i'm going out of town for a week tomorrow. i've never done an auto-reply > (i'm out of town till next year) type of thing. i checked some mutt FAQs > and sifted through man mutt and man muttrc but didn't see anything alluding

Re: reread configuration file

2002-09-25 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 10:31:26PM +0200, Hans Ginzel wrote: > >can mutt reread hiis configuration file ~/.muttrc? Has mutt command > "source" like VIM? It's so similar, it's got the same name. Please look at the man page for muttrc. You'll find an entry for the command "source."

Re: yes/no bug

2002-10-03 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 05:46:29PM -0700, Martin Siegert wrote: > > Is there a way to tell mutt to display the correct prompt (y/n), e.g., > > Create /home/siegert/Mail/xyz? ([y]/n): > > other than editing the source code? No. You could play around with doing this via a language modification

Re: Mutt, SSH and Urlview

2002-10-03 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 02:34:37PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > * D. J. Bolderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-03 10:55]: > > > well - complain to your winxp dealer then! > > > you have *paid* for the damn thing, right? > > > > No. My boss. see ? > > so it is either your boss's problem or you > ar