On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 08:01:47AM -0500, Walt Mankowski wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 01:57:47PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote: > > Is there a way of giving the gpg signiture a default name like > > 'nicks_electronic_signiture' or something equally as clear? > > > > On some clients it's coming up labled the same as the subject and on > > others, some weird default like 'attach0023' > > > > Most confusing. > > Why do you care what the attachment is named? Mutt should take care > of everything for you behind the scenes.
For people who don't run mutt and basically never will, but to whom we wish to speak anyway (my mom, for example), attachments like AT029102.TXT are confusing. If it was called SIGNATURE.TXT or something, she might more easily understand it and ignore it. Et cetera. -- rjbs
msg22581/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
