your script with all of the above worked in.
Warning: it's still totally untested. Comments welcome.
[ One minor problem so far is that the FreeBSD date(1) doesn't
understand the --date option, but has a -v option rather, with:
-v -3m
meaning 3 months ago, and
-v +7d
meaning 7
Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 7 Sep 2001, at 2:21, Piet Delport wrote:
> > - The ${foo} syntax expands to the contents of variable "foo", not
> > to the output of command "foo". For command substitution, either
> > use $(foo), or `foo` (note the backticks). The
no such file or directory.
> pgp and gpg are both on the PATH.
> Clues ?
Have you set the various pgp_*_command options correctly (most likely by
sourcing gpg.rc or one of the pgp.rc files (that are included in the
mutt distribution) from your .muttrc)?
--
Piet Delport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Today's subliminal thought is:
s@ns\.gbnet\.net
or even better, the "List-Id:" or "Mailing-List:" headers, but
mutt-users has neither. :-/
[1] Sidetrack: I checked now and noticed that TO_ includes
"Resent-To:", which should actually catch bounces by some (most?)
MUAs. It still isn't b
ble to get ssmtp or similar running.
Actually, i remember ssmtp running quite well when used mutt on Cygwin
(i've since moved to FreeBSD, thank Eris). It can be installed very
easily via Cygwin's setup.exe, AFAIR, just like mutt.
--=20
Piet Delport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Today&#
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001 at 10:48:30 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Piet Delport [14/09/01 00:40 +0200]:
> > Actually, i remember ssmtp running quite well when used mutt on Cygwin
> > (i've since moved to FreeBSD, thank Eris). It can be installed very
> > easily via
n),
> instead of going forward, it still goes backward.
I can confirm that here (see headers for version info). The same seems
to happen at the prompt for changing to another mailbox (`c').
--
Piet Delport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Today's subliminal thought is:
PGP signature
ust now while writing this mail, i saw for the
first time how ${1+"$@"} works. Ingenious approach, even if a bit
redundant. Most probably in the context of the tip you found it in it
was a workaround for a shell that didn't handle a plain "$@" correctly?)
--=20
Piet Delpo
o why not tag-thread?
A temporary workaround is something like this:
macro pager \ec "" "tag the current thre=
ad"
I use a similar macro to do a sync-mailbox from the pager.
--=20
Piet Delport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Today's subliminal thought is:
--JBi0ZxuS5ua
case the "important" flag. Ultimately what I want is for it
> to do an automatic "save" to a particular mail folder (always the same
> folder, it has no need to ask me for a name).
> I am RTFM as we speak :)
Something like:
macro x "~F\n+foldername\n"
hen there's still zsh, sash, and many other variations probably.
(This is getting very off-topic for mutt-users, we should probably take
it off-list.)
--=20
Piet Delport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Today's subliminal thought is:
--da9oBGf5DLtF9ehv
Content-Type: application/
--19HmC3QOnaNVzKTI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 at 13:47:32 +0200, Cedric Duval wrote:
> * Piet Delport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09/16/01 05:47]:
> > A temporary workaround is
ace as you can. The more difficult it is for an imposter to
`fake' all the copies at once (or sequentially, while you're checking
them), the better.
--=20
Piet Delport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Today's subliminal thought is:
--uQr8t48UFsdbeI+V
Content-Type: application/pgp-sig
xt?
If you are running an emacs-mode or -plugin (i'm not too familiar with
emacs myself, i'm a vim fan) for mail messages, have you tried disabling
it?
--=20
Piet Delport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Today's subliminal thought is:
--mvpLiMfbWzRoNl4x
Content-Type:
it won't include any of them when I hit "g" group reply? Or is
> there way to mutt respect the current "From:" and regard it as "me" ?
Are you looking for "alternates"?
--=20
Piet Delport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Today's subliminal thoug
hich case you're probably much better off reverting to the default
bindings. (I can't for the life of me figure out the usefulness of
previous- and next-undeleted while in the line editor...)
--=20
Piet Delport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Today's subliminal thought is:
--4Ckj6UjgE2iN
ommand and you're set; no
extra config required, and no risk of munging actual messages.
[1] What happens if the message you're rot'ing is something besides
text/plain, like text/html f'rinstance? The given macro will just
nuke the content-type from orbit, leaving you looking at HTML
source.
--
Piet Delport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Today's subliminal thought is:
PGP signature
thread on my old Cygwin installation.)
[2] Which is the result of 9 (a tab) + 128 (the high bit).
--
Piet Delport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Today's subliminal thought is:
PGP signature
\cX lose its description?
Oops, missed that. The description is lost every time is
re-defined from within the other macros. Either add it there, or drop
it altogether, i think. (Docs? We don' need no steenkin' docs! :-)
--=20
Piet Delport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Today's subliminal
naked here. (I'm using Maildir here, which doesn't require
`From 's in the message body to be escaped.
Erika, those messages should be fine. Any chance of you posting (or
mailing privately) some full examples (after stripping any
private/sensitive information, of course)
...]
> And the script signature looks like:
>=20
> #!/bin/bash
>=20
> cat /home/rene/.signature
> echo ""
> /usr/games/fortune -a -s -n 200
Very OT, but why use "#!/bin/bash" when "#!/bin/sh" will do? Not every
Unix comes with bash in /bin like
e done this once or
twice while recovering Pine mailboxes without any apparent ill effects.)
--=20
Piet Delport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Today's subliminal thought is:
--wq9mPyueHGvFACwf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Vers
vir,
ohg lbh jrag naq qrpelcgrq vg naljnl, ubj pna lbh pbzcynva?)
Sha snpg bs gur qnl: `iv' EBG13'q orpbzrf `vi'.
> Also, I've never used it.
Lbh unir abj. :-)
--
Piet Delport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Today's subliminal thought is:
PGP signature
(Is there a more convenient way to do this?)
> % avoid that. I just made an other test with an other sentence and the
> % same result. Let's see what happens.
> %=20
> % >From heaven to earth.
> % >From alpha to omega.
>=20
> As expected :-)
Those showed up with
rving quoting.
This can be done via "!{motion}par 72j", or more conveniently by setting
vim's `equalprg' or `formatprg' options to `par 72j', and then
formatting text with "=3D{motion}" or "gq{motion}", respectively.
--=20
Piet Delport <[EMA
ripping yourself from group replies automatically, etc...
--=20
Piet Delport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Today's subliminal thought is:
--mojUlQ0s9EVzWg2t
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
-enter the newsgroup, the articles just dissappear
again, just like before.
I think the problem is leafnode related, as mutt works perfectly on my
ISP's news server.
Version info:=20
Mutt 1.3.22.1i (2001-08-30)
Leafnode+ NNTP Daemon, version 2.14
Any clues?
--=20
Piet Delport &l
ying, and change
> my_hdr From: to be <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> instead of
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>=20
> I hope that makes sense? :-)
>=20
> Any ideas?
I think the `reverse_name' and `reverse_realname' settings are what
you're looking for.
--=20
Piet D
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 at 06:20:33 +0200, Piet Delport wrote:
[snip mutt and leafnode not working]
> I think the problem is leafnode related, as mutt works perfectly on my
> ISP's news server.
>
> Version info:
> Mutt 1.3.22.1i (2001-08-30)
> Leafnode+ NN
[to top of file]
> /^$ [find header/body boundary]
> j [down 1 line to body proper]
> !Ggpg --clearsign [pipe/replace from here to EOF into gpg]
>
> I suppose that vim ought to work the same way.
You can do it a bit more elegantly[
30 matches
Mail list logo
