S/MIME

2000-03-27 Thread Magnus Stenman
What is the status on the S/MIME implementation that was mentioned on the list a while ago? Is it in the current snapshot? /magnus

Re: : SMTP

2000-07-20 Thread Magnus Stenman
m of a vcard or similar could be in the body. Anyone find this interesting? > > Shade and sweet water! > > Stephan > > -- > | Stephan SeitzE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | > | WWW: http://fsing.fs.uni-sb.de/~stse/ | > | PGP Public

Re: : : SMTP

2000-07-22 Thread Magnus Stenman
On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 10:46:19AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Magnus Stenman proclaimed on mutt-users that: > > > How nice if I could do my mail. I got [S]IMAP for incoming, > > but outgoing often gets munged or refused when I try to > > use my "home

bind syntax

2000-09-10 Thread Magnus Stenman
Is there a way to / would it be a good idea to be able to set more than one map when binding a key, eg: bind index,pager \e previous-entry (instead of stacking multiple entries for whatever maps you are binding to) /magnus -- Magnus Stenman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: SMTP AUTH-capable MTA

2001-08-14 Thread Magnus Stenman
Vineet Kumar wrote: > ... > > decision I disagree with. And seeing as that screening server has > > already had three significant downtimes in the past month I'd like to > > bypass it altogether. > > Before you spend a lot of time and energy downloading and compiling > something of your own, m

Re: Convert from Pine to Mutt, howto

2001-08-23 Thread Magnus Stenman
OK, lots of people answered this one, I just got a couple of extra tips: Rune Mossige wrote: > > I have been using Pine for the last 6-8 years, and have come to > be used to the way Pine works. > > However, over the last few months, I have heard more and more > good things about mutt, and have

Re: mutt & exchange

2001-09-12 Thread Magnus Stenman
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > > Johannes Zellner [12/09/01 12:04 +0200]: > > how do I use mutt with an EXCHANGE server ? > > Actually I can already READ mail by having > > set imap_user="" > > set imap_pass="" > > > but if I try to SEND mail, it tells me > > Error 127 .. Exec error. > > Mutt

Re: mutt & exchange

2001-09-12 Thread Magnus Stenman
Lars Hecking wrote: > > > Another good reason to include SMTP capabilities into mutt. > > They don't belong there. Check the archives, this has been discussed > to death already. I know, and the arguments usually go along the lines of "Mutt is a MUA, not a MTA". This was a comment related to