went
straight on into my institute and installed in on the Solaris servers
because I could not wait for the admin to install it globally. It
compiled with no hassle at all (SuSE 7.2 and Solaris 2.6 / SunOS 5.6).
Cheers,
Cristian
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 11:38:44PM +0100, Jun Liu wrote:
&g
optional cursor for
> >the internal pager.
>
> Any takers? I'd include such a patch with mutt pretty much
> immediately if it was clean.
Fine. Any takers? :-)
Cheers,
Cristian
--
}{ Cristian Pietsch
}{ http://www.interling.de
msg20867/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
message body so it's worth to hand over control
to w3m? Can you do it without slowing down the whole Mutt?
Surely, your proposed solution will help me to read LinguistList
digests, so thank you very much so far!
Cristian
--
}{ Cristian Pietsch
}{ http://www.interling.de
msg20889/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
verted to iso-8859-1 quotes or dashes, for
instance. Iconv does not do this for me.
As a consequence, overriding the charset does not help me.
Am I the only one suffering from this Windows disease?
Would you all like me to suffer more silently? ;-)
Cristian
--
}{ Cristian Pietsch
}{ http://www.interling.de
msg21266/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
rocess substitution ".
Read it carefully -- it's fun to use!
Cheers,
Cristian
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 12:05:29PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> I'm not familiar with the <( construct. What shell are you using?
--
}{ Cristian Pietsch
}{ http://www.interling.de
msg21475/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
t some time ago
are finally displayed correctly. So where iconv refused to make
approximating translations from Windows-1252 to ISO-8859-1, it
succeeds translating from Windows-1252 to Unicode (and on to UTF-8).
OK folks, time to switch to UTF-8!
Cristian
--
}{ Cristian Pietsch
}{ h
t until now:
> German gpg messages aren't display correctly,
Is this problem generally known? If not, please provide details.
Greetings from Saarbruecken,
Cristian
--
}{ Cristian Pietsch
}{ http://www.interling.de
msg21692/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ging Gigabytes'' which is often
used for searching in really big gobs of mail. You can find it there:
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/mg/
Cheers,
Cristian
--
}{ Cristian Pietsch
}{ http://www.interling.de
msg21713/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
st mode for editing only?
There's one more thing I should mention: I'm using GNU Emacs 20.7 on
Linux 2.4.4. I quickly tried to run Mutt within GNU Emacs 21.0 but
there was more severe trouble with colors (status bar and help bar
invisible). If someone has a solution for Emacs 21, please report it
here!
Cheers,
Cristian
--
}{ Cristian Pietsch
}{ http://www.interling.de
msg21810/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
One more advice to Chris:
There's something else I needed to set in ~/.muttrc:
set ascii_chars # use ASCII instead of ACS chars for threads
Perhaps your Emacs font includes ACS (= DEC?) pseudo-graphic
characters. In this case, you might not need to do it.
Cheers,
Cri
et
... and found your key there (via web browser).
Obviously my server needs an update from your server. If you find the
time, you might want do this yourself by uploading your key to a
pgp.net server.
Cheers,
Cristian
--
}{ Cristian Pietsch
}{ http://www.interling.de
msg22467/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
to reduce this overhead. I can live with it on an
ISDN dialup line. Signatures are really small, and encrypted messages
are compressed automatically. If you receive many encrypted messages,
your hard disk will say `thank you'!
Look into the archives and into the Web to find out
s far as I am
concerned, (unpatched) Mutt's PGP support is currently only usable for
the Mutt mailing lists -- no matter how pgp_create_traditional is set.
Time for a change of policy (or religion), right?
Cheers,
Cristian
--
}{ Cristian Pietsch
}{ http://www.interling.de
msg22683/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I
agree with Will Yardley and Michael Elkins who voted for integrating
it with the next full Mutt release.
Someone please tell the developers.
Cheers,
Cristian
--
}{ Cristian Pietsch
}{ http://www.interling.de
msg22689/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ake p_c_t result in
> a plain text MIME type for clearsigned messages.
That's right. This can be achieved by integrating the patch into the
next full release of Mutt.
Cheers
Cristian
--
}{ Cristian Pietsch
}{ http://www.interling.de
msg22737/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Would somebody else check that please?
> Okay, this was long. Could someone with inside knowledge of mutt and
> the relevant standards please comment on this patch?
I am not this person.
This Email is signed the same way as described above. So you can try
to verify it with whatever
you just tried to verify my email too early in the
process. Try viewing the message in you MUA and then piping it through
GPG!
What you observed is an issue inherent in the traditional way of
clearsigning but many MUAs handle it well (or so I hope).
Cheers,
Cristian
--
}{ Cristian Pietsch
}
that if I want to do this from the command line without going
inside the interface I can not.
mutt -y [EMAIL PROTECTED] -s "Build Failed" -a ./build.log
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there any way I can do this from a script without having to go inside
the actual interface?
Thanks,
Cristian
Thank you so much, it actually works.
Regards,
Cristian
Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2001-03-22 19:12:31 -0500, Cristian Gheorghe wrote:
>
> > I can see how to attach a file, specify the address, subject, etc. It's
> > just that if I want to do this from the com
Hi all,
I need to sent automatic messages to some users following a nightly build. Can I pass
some parameter to mutt so that I can specify a Reply-To address (which, of course is
different than the address that I am using to send the message originally).
Thank you,
Cristian
Thanks for your help. I have checked the man page and I ended up exporting the REPLYTO
env. variable. Works quite nice.
Regards,
Cristian
Jim Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 04:49:14PM -0500, Cristian Gheorghe
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> &g
went
straight on into my institute and installed in on the Solaris servers
because I could not wait for the admin to install it globally. It
compiled with no hassle at all (SuSE 7.2 and Solaris 2.6 / SunOS 5.6).
Cheers,
Cristian
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 11:38:44PM +0100, Jun Liu wrote:
&g
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 01:44, José Romildo Malaquias wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have just installed the new release (8.0) of
> Red Hat Linux and want to replace the mutt
> package from the Linux distribution with one
> with support for compressed folders. But I
> am not succeeding in compiling it.
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
