masquerading

I changed my hostname but want to have my previous hostname (which is a DNS CNAME alias to the new hostname) in mail postings (I subscribed several mailing lists with the old name) Is this possible with an entry in .muttrc/.mailrc? -- Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies [EMAIL PROTECTED]

problem with Mime headers

During searching for a way to pretty print my Emails from mutt I found, that all messages (or at least the message under concern) are stored from ISO-8859-1 to quoted-printable. I tried various converters, especially "recode" and recode is complaing about some ungueltige Eingabe in data. (when I

Re: problem with Mime headers

Kyle Wheeler schrieb: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, May 5 at 01:32 PM, quoth Christoph Kukulies: During searching for a way to pretty print my Emails from mutt I found, that all messages (or at least the message under concern) are stored from ISO-8859-1 to

replies with umlauts garbled

When I compose an email (using vi under ubuntu), and send that email, the recipients tell me that the umlauts are fine. But when I reply - in the course of follwups - to that email (that has made one turn-around), the umlauts come out garbled. Newly typed umlauts seem to be ok. Excerpt of my .mu

mutt screen view with left bar indented

I'm running Mutt 1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) on Ubuntu 8.04 for some time now and I'm still having problems with the characterset. Will address this issue later in a separate thread. I downloaded the packages (apt-get) mutt-patched, muttprofile and muttprint hoping to get (at least with the

compilation warning FWIW

I'm compiling 1.5.20 under Ubuntu 8.04 presently. Just want to bring the following warning to the developers' attention: -MF .deps/main.Tpo -c -o main.o main.c main.c:73: Warnung: Zeichenkettenlänge »558« ist größer als die Länge »509«, die von ISO-C90-Compilern unterstützt werden muss mv -f .

Re: mutt screen view with left bar indented

? -- Christoph Christoph Kukulies schrieb: I'm running Mutt 1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) on Ubuntu 8.04 for some time now and I'm still having problems with the characterset. Will address this issue later in a separate thread. I downloaded the packages (apt-get) mutt-patched, muttprofile

Re: mutt screen view with left bar indented

OK, I finally found the solution: set sidebar_visible=no in .muttrc solves it. -- Christoph Christoph Kukulies schrieb: Since nobody jumped in so far I was looking around a bit and found something like being called "sidebar patch". Is it that I'm suffering from? And does

again umlauts as backslah octal in builtin pager

Since my mail partners always complained about my Umlauts not getting through and such, I decided to use LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 LANGUAGE=de_DE:de:en_GB:en LC_CTYPE="de_DE.UTF-8" LC_NUMERIC="de_DE.UTF-8" LC_TIME="de_DE.UTF-8" LC_COLLATE="de_DE.UTF-8" LC_MONETARY="de_DE.UTF-8" LC_MESSAGES="de_DE.UTF-8"

Re: again umlauts as backslah octal in builtin pager

urned -1; errno = 84. ../pager.c:1102: mbrtowc returned -1; errno = 84. Christoph Kukulies schrieb: Since my mail partners always complained about my Umlauts not getting through and such, I decided to use LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 LANGUAGE=de_DE:de:en_GB:en LC_CTYPE="de_DE.UTF-8" LC_NUMER

Re: again umlauts as backslah octal in builtin pager

iso-8859-1 or some other encoding? Would the reply converted into the repliers encoding? I would say so. -- Christoph Christoph Kukulies schrieb: Maybe it's interesting that this can be found in ~/.muttdebug0: ../pager.c:1102: mbrtowc returned -1; errno = 84. ../pager.c:1102: mbr

Re: again umlauts as backslah octal in builtin pager

Jostein Berntsen schrieb: On 04.02.10,15:13, Christoph Kukulies wrote: Jostein advised me in another thread (but I'm taking it to here): For your charset issues, try to to enter these settings in your .muttrc: set charset="UTF-8" set send_charset="us-ascii

sending to a list of undisclosed recipients

Everyone know this when you get an email from someone and he is disclosing his whole (Outlook) addressbook to the recipients. Often this is an interesting field for social research :) but that left aside, I would like avoid this in a case now when I'm about to send an information about an upcom

Re: sending to a list of undisclosed recipients

Am 27.07.2010 09:39, schrieb Brian Salter-Duke: On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 09:36:44AM +0200, Christoph Kukulies wrote: Everyone know this when you get an email from someone and he is disclosing his whole (Outlook) addressbook to the recipients. Often this is an interesting field for social

Re: sending to a list of undisclosed recipients

Am 27.07.2010 13:19, schrieb Christian Ebert: * Christoph Kukulies on Tuesday, July 27, 2010 at 12:56:26 +0200 Am 27.07.2010 09:39, schrieb Brian Salter-Duke: On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 09:36:44AM +0200, Christoph Kukulies wrote: Instead of going through a for i in `cat users

Re: sending to a list of undisclosed recipients

Am 27.07.2010 13:58, schrieb Christian Ebert: * Christoph Kukulies on Tuesday, July 27, 2010 at 13:51:29 +0200 Am 27.07.2010 13:19, schrieb Christian Ebert: * Christoph Kukulies on Tuesday, July 27, 2010 at 12:56:26 +0200 Am 27.07.2010 09:39, schrieb Brian Salter-Duke

Re: sending to a list of undisclosed recipients

Am 27.07.2010 23:57, schrieb Grant Edwards: On 2010-07-27, Christoph Kukulies wrote: Everyone know this when you get an email from someone and he is disclosing his whole (Outlook) addressbook to the recipients. Often this is an interesting field for social research :) but that left aside

Re: sending to a list of undisclosed recipients

Am 28.07.2010 17:04, schrieb Grant Edwards: On 2010-07-28, Christoph Kukulies wrote: Am 27.07.2010 23:57, schrieb Grant Edwards: On 2010-07-27, Christoph Kukulies wrote: Everyone know this when you get an email from someone and he is disclosing his whole (Outlook

sending an email with a mutt one-line without being prompted

I'm trying mutt -i message.text -s subject -a attachment.jpg recipi...@domain Is there a way to do that without being prompted? -- Christoph

Re: sending an email with a mutt one-line without being prompted

Am 01.08.2010 18:13, schrieb Jostein Berntsen: On 01.08.10,18:05, Christoph Kukulies wrote: I'm trying mutt -i message.text -s subject -a attachment.jpg recipi...@domain Is there a way to do that without being prompted? You can try: mutt -s subject -a attachment.jpg r

Re: sending an email with a mutt one-line without being prompted

Am 01.08.2010 18:49, schrieb Jostein Berntsen: On 01.08.10,18:33, Christoph Kukulies wrote: Am 01.08.2010 18:13, schrieb Jostein Berntsen: On 01.08.10,18:05, Christoph Kukulies wrote: I'm trying mutt -i message.text -s subject -a attachment.jpg recipi...@domain Is th

Re: sending an email with a mutt one-line without being prompted

Am 01.08.2010 19:10, schrieb rog...@sdf.org: On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 06:33:35PM +0200, Christoph Kukulies wrote: Am 01.08.2010 18:13, schrieb Jostein Berntsen: On 01.08.10,18:05, Christoph Kukulies wrote: I'm trying mutt -i message.text -s subject -a attachment.jpg r

Re: sending an email with a mutt one-line without being prompted

Am 02.08.2010 10:58, schrieb Simon Ruderich: On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 07:31:28PM +0200, Christoph Kukulies wrote: [snip] I opened a can of worms obviously. On the target system (debian) the stock mutt-1.5.20.tgz doesn't compile because it can't find libcurses. I have libncurses5

Re: sending an email with a mutt one-line without being prompted

Am 02.08.2010 23:13, schrieb Will Fiveash: On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 03:49:47PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote: On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 10:52:01PM -0500, David Champion wrote: Syntax has been changed: -a indicates a *list* of attachment files ending with "--". I don't recall which versio

Re: winmail.dat

Am 18.07.2011 16:17, schrieb Jostein Berntsen: On 18.07.11,13:27, Christoph P.U. Kukulies wrote: Am 18.07.2011 12:20, schrieb Christian Brabandt: On Mon, July 18, 2011 9:45 am, Christoph P.U. Kukulies wrote: Hi. I'm running Mutt 1.5.20 (2009-06-14) under Ubuntu and was wondering why mutt could