[Using Mutt-1.5.21 with FreeBSD and Arch Linux]
Hi there,
I noticed a nasty behaviour I do not understand. It happens if the e-mail
contains latin characters with acute, like 'é', but no unicode character not
covered by latin1. The text editor -- Emacs, but I tested with others too --
will correc
On 12-09-26 20:59:51, Christian Ebert wrote:
> * Ambrevar on Wednesday, September 26, 2012 at 21:43:18 +0200
> > [Using Mutt-1.5.21 with FreeBSD and Arch Linux]
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I noticed a nasty behaviour I do not understand. It happens if the e-mail
&
[Mutt 1.5.21 on FreeBSD and Arch Linux]
Hi
My fellows recently let me aware of the fact that all the e-mail I've sent them
with Mutt could not be displayed correctly on their Android 2.* smartphone. The
mails display an empty body, the actual body being displayed as an attachment
(which Android m
On 12-09-27 17:53:43, Jim Graham wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:07:51PM -0500, Luis Mochan wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:06:00PM +0200, Ambrevar wrote:
> > I don't recall any problem reading with Android 2.1 mail sent by
> > mutt. I use K-9 as my Andro
On 12-09-29 19:47:24, Sebastian Tramp wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:46:55AM +0200, P. Mazart wrote:
>
> > > … [Content-Disposition-Header] … But I must disagree: a *lot* of people
> > > are
> > > using the stock MUA. Simply because they don't care. That's why this issue
> > > shouldn't be n
On 12-09-29 19:47:24, Sebastian Tramp wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:46:55AM +0200, P. Mazart wrote:
>
> > > … [Content-Disposition-Header] … But I must disagree: a *lot* of people
> > > are
> > > using the stock MUA. Simply because they don't care. That's why this issue
> > > shouldn't be n
