On 12-09-29 19:47:24, Sebastian Tramp wrote: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:46:55AM +0200, P. Mazart wrote: > > > > … [Content-Disposition-Header] … But I must disagree: a *lot* of people > > > are > > > using the stock MUA. Simply because they don't care. That's why this issue > > > shouldn't be neglected. > > > > I agree. But is this really a problem with mutt rather than android’s stock > > MUA? > > I have the same problem. Can you provide the patch somewhere? > > ST > > -- > WebID: http://sebastian.tramp.name
Hi there, For those using the patch I provided for compatibility with Android stock MUA, I just noticed a mistake of mine: attachments you send have no name! A quick look at the header and you will see that the "filename" variable is missing. This is because I short-circuited the whole process. Thanksfully I managed to fix this. I handled the issue differently: if a part of the e-mail has no file (e.g. e-mail body) then Content-Disposition line is not printed at all. Otherwise Content-Disposition is printed with filename="..." after it. So basically that's exactly Mutt's default behaviour for attachments. Only e-mail body will be affected, which is exactly what we want for Android compatibility. You can get my new (hopefully) fully-functional patch at the same location: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63185 Cheers -- Pierre Neidhardt O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org As you will see, I told them, in no uncertain terms, to see Figure one. -- Dave "First Strike" Pare
