Re: crypt-hook: truncated list of gpg recipients passed to pgpewrap

2016-07-28 Thread Steve Schmerler
On Jul 27 19:19 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > I think I see the problem. Mutt is using a fixed buffer of size 1024 > when expanding the %r parameter. I think when the system was designed, > no one anticipated expanding 50+ keys in a single gpg invocation. :-) Yes, I was suspecting something

Re: crypt-hook: truncated list of gpg recipients passed to pgpewrap

2016-07-28 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:12:52AM +0200, Steve Schmerler wrote: > On Jul 27 19:19 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > Thanks! I'll give gpgme a spin. I didn't find that much documentation, > though. I only need to set > > crypt_use_gpgme > crypt_use_pka You only really need to set crypt_u

mutt smtp/pop

2016-07-28 Thread dale
I used to use Mutt on Ubuntu from the repository and got it to work except for smtp TLS, my ISP doesn't allow direct email, still doesn't I get a reply mail saying so I am now using Debian GNU/Linux 8 (jessie) 64-bit and Mutt 1.5.23-3 which came installed as I saw in the package manager I c

Re: mutt smtp/pop

2016-07-28 Thread hymie
dale writes: >my ISP doesn't allow direct email >set smtp_url="smtp://d...@dalekelly.org@smtpout.secureserver.net:25" >I get the following messages >Connecting to smtpout.secureserver.net... >Could not connect to smtpout.secureserver.net (Interrupted system call). It's very likely that your ISP

Re: mutt smtp/pop

2016-07-28 Thread dale
On 07/28/2016 01:46 PM, hy...@lactose.homelinux.net wrote: dale writes: my ISP doesn't allow direct email set smtp_url="smtp://d...@dalekelly.org@smtpout.secureserver.net:25" I get the following messages Connecting to smtpout.secureserver.net... Could not connect to smtpout.secureserver.ne

Re: mutt smtp/pop

2016-07-28 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2016-07-28, dale wrote: > I get a reply from my ISP when I try to directly send, no message when I > use SMTP How do you "directly send" without using SMTP? -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! I don't understand at the

Re: how to escape complex pattern for folder-hook?

2016-07-28 Thread Andre Majorel
On 2016-07-25 23:44 +0200, Gregor Zattler wrote: > I get status emails in some mail folder which I occasionally > delete with delete-pattern (bound to "D") and this pattern: > > ~s"Cron nice ionice -c 3 ~/bin/my-notmuch-new-and-tagging" > ~b^"No new mail." !~b"^Processed" > > > I would lik

Re: mutt smtp/pop

2016-07-28 Thread dale
On 07/28/2016 04:10 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2016-07-28, dale wrote: I get a reply from my ISP when I try to directly send, no message when I use SMTP How do you "directly send" without using SMTP? with the default sending mechanism that came with it before I configured SMTP variables

Re: mutt smtp/pop

2016-07-28 Thread dale
On 07/28/2016 07:39 PM, dale wrote: On 07/28/2016 04:10 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2016-07-28, dale wrote: I get a reply from my ISP when I try to directly send, no message when I use SMTP How do you "directly send" without using SMTP? with the default sending mechanism that came with i

Re: mutt smtp/pop

2016-07-28 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 20:23:49 -0400, dale wrote: > On 07/28/2016 07:39 PM, dale wrote: > >On 07/28/2016 04:10 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: > >>On 2016-07-28, dale wrote: > >> > >>>I get a reply from my ISP when I try to directly send, no message when I > >>>use SMTP > >> > >>How do you "directly se

Re: mutt smtp/pop

2016-07-28 Thread dale
On 07/28/2016 09:00 PM, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote: On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 20:23:49 -0400, dale wrote: On 07/28/2016 07:39 PM, dale wrote: On 07/28/2016 04:10 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2016-07-28, dale wrote: I get a reply from my ISP when I try to directly send, no message when I us