Hi,
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 05:08:22PM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> * On 09 Dec 2014, John Long wrote:
> > The messages seem to all have message-ids in the form
> >
> > bunchofch...@m.something.com
>
> You'll need to be much more specific if you want help writing a matching
> regex. Is "some
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 04:17:00PM -0500, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 20:39:16 +, John Long wrote:
> > score '~i @m\..*\.com' -
> >
> > matches on
> >
> > Message-ID: <5486ad9f.8186460a.0aee.1...@mx.google.com>
>
> You want the actual regex
* On 10 Dec 2014, John Long wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 05:08:22PM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> > * On 09 Dec 2014, John Long wrote:
> > > The messages seem to all have message-ids in the form
> > >
> > > bunchofch...@m.something.com
> >
> > You'll need to be much more specific if you
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 06:50:30AM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> OK, I see what I'm missing now: it's the "m" vs "mx". You're right,
> getting the regex right for this one will be enough -- for now. But
> it turns out that more than one site uses m.*.com hostnames, so
> you'll be back in this p
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 04:28:53PM -0500, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 16:17:00 -0500, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> > but mutt also processes backslashes when it is parsing the command line
> > defining the expresion -- so you may need to quote the backslashes.
>
