On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 06:50:30AM -0600, David Champion wrote: > OK, I see what I'm missing now: it's the "m" vs "mx". You're right, > getting the regex right for this one will be enough -- for now. But > it turns out that more than one site uses m.*.com hostnames, so > you'll be back in this position some time.
Maybe, but so far as the emails I get it's only these bastards. > I think that when writing mail-filtering rules, it's best to be as exact > as you can, not as ambiguous as you can get away with. That depends whether you're a sysadmin, or a mail server admin, or just a guy using mutt ;-) Of course correct is always better but sometimes good enough is good enough. Now that you guys have been helping me I'm not getting enough spam to test the new rules on! /jl -- ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) Powered by Lemote Fuloong against HTML e-mail X Loongson MIPS and OpenBSD and proprietary / \ http://www.mutt.org attachments / \ Code Blue or Go Home! Encrypted email preferred PGP Key 2048R/DA65BC04
