On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 02:25:16PM +0800, Chris Down wrote:
> Well, that's exactly what I was recommending -- using something like
> sendmail over something which is designed for far more (Postfix).
Sendmail and Postfix are both MTAs, they both do (essentially) the same
thing.
Cheers,
Tom
--
P
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 08:48:50AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 04Jan2014 20:01, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > El día Sunday, January 05, 2014 a las 02:50:12AM +0800, Chris Down escribió:
> > > On 2014-01-04 19:35:19 +0100, Ulrich Lauther wrote:
> > > > Recent posts made me aware of the fact, th
* Richard Z [01-05-14 08:57]:
[...]
> unless you try to do something like multiple email providers for one
> user which is very easy to do with anything but sendmail/postfix/exim.
> I have done this on all three and got tired, after every system upgrade
> some incompatible change breaks it and e
El día Sunday, January 05, 2014 a las 09:16:02AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan
escribió:
> * Richard Z [01-05-14 08:57]:
> [...]
> > unless you try to do something like multiple email providers for one
> > user which is very easy to do with anything but sendmail/postfix/exim.
> > I have done this on
Dear mutt-users,
Anybody knows the format of the ".index"-file (used to manage the
certificates and keys in a S/SMIME-setup[1])?
The first three items are obvious...
first.l...@domain.com 1a2b3c4d.0 me ? t
^ email ^ key ^ label
...but what about the last 2? I didn't find
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 04:25:39PM +0100, Heiko Heil wrote:
[...]
first.l...@domain.com 1a2b3c4d.0 me ? t
^ email ^ key ^ label
...but what about the last 2? I didn't find any information in the
manuals.
I found the description of those fields in smime.c:
/* 0=email 1=name
On Sunday 05 Jan 2014 19:10:42 Heiko Heil wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 04:25:39PM +0100, Heiko Heil wrote:
> > [...]
> > first.l...@domain.com 1a2b3c4d.0 me ? t
> > ^ email ^ key ^ label
> >
> >...but what about the last 2? I didn't find any information in the
> >manuals.
>
On 05Jan2014 14:25, Chris Down wrote:
> On 2014-01-04 20:01:56 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > I'm using mutt (right now by typing) on my FreeBSD netbook, connected
> > via UMTS WAN to my ISP. My mutt drops the mail (this mail) to the local
> > MTA (sendmail) and this takes care for the transport
On 05Jan2014 14:55, Richard Z wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 08:48:50AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> > AND:... All the local systems that send email (eg cron and innumerable
> > shell scripts) can send email via the UNIX standard "sendmail"
> > executable.
> >
> > Use a real mail system loca
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 09:16:02AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Richard Z [01-05-14 08:57]:
> [...]
> > unless you try to do something like multiple email providers for one
> > user which is very easy to do with anything but sendmail/postfix/exim.
> > I have done this on all three and got
Hello,
Is there a setting or magic trick for automatically collapsing
threads? I cannot seem to find anything that would affect the initial
thread collapse/uncollapse state (e.g. upon entering a mailbox).
-- kchr
|_|O|_|
|_|_|O| Kim Christensen
|O|O|O| http://technopragmatics.org
--
On 06Jan2014 00:50, Kim Christensen wrote:
> Is there a setting or magic trick for automatically collapsing
> threads? I cannot seem to find anything that would affect the initial
> thread collapse/uncollapse state (e.g. upon entering a mailbox).
My mutt state is arranged so that completely read
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:32:16AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> My mutt state is arranged so that completely read threads are
> collapsed, and threads with unread items are expanded.
[snip]
> I've also included a few keyboard macros I find useful.
Awesome, exactly what I had in mind.
Thanks
Please, I read the list and have NO need of duplicate copies of posts.
* Richard Z [01-05-14 16:57]:
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 09:16:02AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > * Richard Z [01-05-14 08:57]:
> > [...]
> > > unless you try to do something like multiple email providers for one
> > > u
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 10:55:22PM +0100, Richard Z wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 09:16:02AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > * Richard Z [01-05-14 08:57]:
> > [...]
> > > unless you try to do something like multiple email providers for one
> > > user which is very easy to do with anything b
15 matches
Mail list logo
