On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:37:46AM -0600, Dale Raby wrote:
> I sign most of my messages, even though I only know a few people who
> actively use GnuPG/PGP. As I see it, this is one way of promoting
> encryption. I.e.: "What is that block of gibberish you have at the end
> of your emails?" "That,
Incoming from Chris Bannister:
>
> Is it true that if you want to correspond with people on windoze who
> use outhouse then it becomes tricky?
I. Don't. Care. [about them].
However, it might present a good opportunity to mention Firefox (or
Opera) and Cygwin. Yes, I am (seriously!) biased.
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 09:49:40PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> Is it true that if you want to correspond with people on windoze who use
> outhouse then it becomes tricky?
It can be. Microsoft doesn't adhere to the appropriate RFC's regarding
email encryption... they use the old in-line stan
Hei hei,
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 03:47:14PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> I know not about "button[s]" as I work with text from the keyboard. But I
> believe we are saying/mean the same thing, mailing list software should
> not insert or alter Reply-To: header!
Of course not, I know we are o
Incoming from Alexander Dahl:
>
> But we were talking about other mailing lists used by other users with
> other MUAs. I heard some of them use buttons and those are exposed to
> the user while mail headers are usually not.
Blasphemy! :-|
> P.S.: and I have to get my mutt macros fixed, some hoo
Hei hei,
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 10:33:03AM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> > P.S.: and I have to get my mutt macros fixed, some hook changed my
> > from address here after I replied on another mailing list … m( *lol*
>
> FWIW:
>
>send-hook . set from=your@emailaddy
I have this line in my send
