Sending attachments without crypt_autosign

2013-02-28 Thread Stefan Wimmer
Hi all, I recently started to sign all my mails and it took me little time to find out that you can't delete attachments in signed/encrypted mails ... ;-) Now I want to automate the way I use crypt_autosign that mutt checks first if there is an attachment and only signs the mail if that's not

Re: Why does some list software not honor the headers? (was ... Re: People want ...)

2013-02-28 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Erik Christiansen [02-28-13 02:44]: > On 27.02.13 15:59, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > I am *against* "Reply-To:" mudging by list software and believe it > > should *only* be employed by a poster wishing replies to his posts to > > be rec'd by a different account such as posting from work and want

Re: Run command on an attachment

2013-02-28 Thread Richard
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 08:14:13PM +0100, Salve Håkedal wrote: > My main machine don't have openoffice or similar installed, but > sometimes I need to use openoffice on an attachment. I now do that by > scp-ing files to that machine and then ssh -X into that machine. > > To scp an attachment to t

Re: Run command on an attachment

2013-02-28 Thread David Champion
* On 28 Feb 2013, Richard wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 08:14:13PM +0100, Salve Håkedal wrote: > > > > Is it possible to scp an attachment directly from mutt? > > should be doable with mailcap This is the approach I would take, too. Rather than trying to move the attachment and open it else

Re: Why does some list software not honor the headers? (was ... Re: People want ...)

2013-02-28 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Erik Christiansen: > On 27.02.13 15:59, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > I am *against* "Reply-To:" mudging by list software and believe it > > should *only* be employed by a poster wishing replies to his posts to > > be rec'd by a different account such as posting from work and wanting >

Re: Why does some list software not honor the headers? (was ... Re: People want ...)

2013-02-28 Thread Will Yardley
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 06:41:55PM +1100, Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 27.02.13 15:59, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > I am *against* "Reply-To:" mudging by list software and believe it > > should *only* be employed by a poster wishing replies to his posts to > > be rec'd by a different account such a

Re: Run command on an attachment

2013-02-28 Thread Salve Håkedal
Thanks all! Script + mailcap does it nicely! -- Salve

Why sign every message? (was Re: Sending attachments without crypt_autosign

2013-02-28 Thread Will Fiveash
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:55:39PM +0100, Stefan Wimmer wrote: > Hi all, > > I recently started to sign all my mails and it took me little time to find > out that you can't delete attachments in signed/encrypted mails ... ;-) > > Now I want to automate the way I use crypt_autosign that mutt check

Re: Why sign every message? (was Re: Sending attachments without crypt_autosign

2013-02-28 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Will Fiveash [02-28-13 14:25]: [...] > I have a couple of comments about this: > > - Why sign most messages? Unless the information is important for > others to verify that it came from a particular person why add the > bloat of a signature. Beyond this I find it ironic that people sign

Re: Why sign every message? (was Sending attachments without crypt_autosign

2013-02-28 Thread Stefan Wimmer
* Patrick Shanahan [2013-02-28 20:38]: * Will Fiveash [02-28-13 14:25]: [...] I have a couple of comments about this: - Why sign most messages? Unless the information is important for others to verify that it came from a particular person why add the bloat of a signature. Beyond this I

Re: Sending attachments without crypt_autosign

2013-02-28 Thread David Haguenauer
* Stefan Wimmer , 2013-02-28 12:55:39 Thu: > I recently started to sign all my mails and it took me little time > to find out that you can't delete attachments in signed/encrypted > mails ... ;-) I patched my copy of mutt so that it will let me delete attachments from encrypted messages (breaking

Re: Why sign every message? (was Sending attachments without crypt_autosign

2013-02-28 Thread Will Fiveash
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 09:30:47PM +0100, Stefan Wimmer wrote: > * Patrick Shanahan [2013-02-28 20:38]: > >* Will Fiveash [02-28-13 14:25]: > >[...] > >>I have a couple of comments about this: > >> > >>- Why sign most messages? Unless the information is important for > >> others to verify that

Re: Why sign every message? (was Sending attachments without crypt_autosign

2013-02-28 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 02:43:36PM -0600, Will Fiveash wrote: > I wasn't referring to you specifically as I see you did publish your > pubkey properly. Instead, I was referring to others (like s.keeling) > that sign everything yet I can not retrieve their pubkey. I'm actually working with him on

Re: Sending attachments without crypt_autosign

2013-02-28 Thread Will Fiveash
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 03:35:44PM -0500, David Haguenauer wrote: > * Stefan Wimmer , 2013-02-28 12:55:39 Thu: > > I recently started to sign all my mails and it took me little time > > to find out that you can't delete attachments in signed/encrypted > > mails ... ;-) > > I patched my copy of mut

Re: Sending attachments without crypt_autosign

2013-02-28 Thread Will Fiveash
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 05:03:23PM -0600, Will Fiveash wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 03:35:44PM -0500, David Haguenauer wrote: > > * Stefan Wimmer , 2013-02-28 12:55:39 Thu: > > > I recently started to sign all my mails and it took me little time > > > to find out that you can't delete attachmen

Re: Why sign every message? (was Re: Sending attachments without crypt_autosign

2013-02-28 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Will Fiveash: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:55:39PM +0100, Stefan Wimmer wrote: > > > > I recently started to sign all my mails and it took me little time > > to find out that you can't delete attachments in signed/encrypted > > mails ... ;-) > > > > Now I want to automate the way I

Re: Why sign every message? (was Sending attachments without crypt_autosign

2013-02-28 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Will Fiveash: > > I wasn't referring to you specifically as I see you did publish your > pubkey properly. Instead, I was referring to others (like s.keeling) > that sign everything yet I can not retrieve their pubkey. ... which is very annoying to me too. =