On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 08:37:18PM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> * Will Yardley [2012-12-02 11:00:56 -0800]:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 09:41:02AM -0600, fREW Schmidt wrote:
> > > (http://dev.mutt.org/trac/wiki/MuttFaq/Charset) and setting
> > >
> > >export LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-1
>
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 01:17:22PM -0600, fREW Schmidt wrote:
> > If you're using startx to start your X session, it's recommended
> > to add the locale setting to ~/.xinitrc so it's in the environment
> > already before opening any terminals, etc. I guess it wouldn't hurt to
> > put it in ~/.xsess
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 02:32:53PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 01:17:22PM -0600, fREW Schmidt wrote:
> > > If you're using startx to start your X session, it's recommended
> > > to add the locale setting to ~/.xinitrc so it's in the environment
> > > already before opening
Hi Guys,
I read the last long discussion about line wrapping and proper mail
formatting.
Sadly I am on a few mailinglists and in contact with some people that
strictly refuse to write nicely formatted mails. So my next idea was to
rewrap the received message on demand, once I notice that I don't
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:39:30PM +0100, Andre Klärner wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I read the last long discussion about line wrapping and proper mail
> formatting.
All of it? You are a braver man than I :)
> Is there any way to pipe a "builtin pager buffer" (the final output
> with verified signatur
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 02:41:25PM -0600, fREW Schmidt wrote:
> > On older distros, you only got this if you installed ncursesw (and
> > ncursesw-dev(el)), though it seems like more recent distros are
> > only providing the wide version (as ncurses, sans the 'w').
Incidentally, this may (or may
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 05:26:34PM -0500, Spangler, Tim wrote:
I have several automated processes that send e-mail from the command line, and
I'd like each one to use its own .muttrc. This would allow me to specify the
return address for each of these sets of e-mails based on the process sendi
On 2012-12-04, Spangler, Tim wrote:
> I have several automated processes that send e-mail from the command
> line, and I'd like each one to use its own .muttrc. This would allow
> me to specify the return address for each of these sets of e-mails
> based on the process sending it.
>
> Here is
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:41:28PM -0500, Spangler, Tim wrote:
The Muttrc_client files look similar to this (file name for this one is
Muttrc_batch):
set realname="Batch Reports"
set from ="donotre...@adpselect.com"
set use_from=yes
Which version of Mutt are you using?
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 11:50:47PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
Are you sure that the "-n" is needed?
-n Causes Mutt to bypass the system configuration file.
That may be telling mutt to ignore the configuration file that you're
specifying with the -F options.
The -n option only controls r
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:41:28PM -0500, Spangler, Tim wrote:
The Muttrc_client files look similar to this (file name for this one is
Muttrc_batch):
set realname="Batch Reports"
set from ="donotre...@adpselect.com"
set use_from=yes
I put the above in 'testrc' and then ran:
$ echo 'hello wor
On 04.12.12 14:00, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> alternatively, you could reformat the mails at receive time through
> a procmail filter or something if you have that kind of access to the
> mail server.
If anyone has a working solution, I'd be interested too. The following
had to be commented out, beca
12 matches
Mail list logo
