[ David Champion Wrote On Sun 25.Nov'12 at 2:00:08 GMT ]
> * On 24 Nov 2012, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> > I have found the source of the problem: the script failed when
> > expiring messages in /var/mail/... but not is mailboxes in my $HOME
> > directory; so, it was a permissions issue which i'v
Understood, thanks again.
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 09:37:47AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 24Nov2012 19:12, John Long wrote:
> | On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 09:15:27AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> | > Some things are timing dependent, and strace does affect things;
> |
> | I realized there m
On 2012-11-24, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Tony's unattended mail [11-24-12 15:58]:
>> Again, this is another straw man. What I am suggesting is not the
>> format=flowed standard. It's a hypothetical hybrid.
>>
>> Saying that people will violate a standard of any kind isn't good
>> enough beca
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 08:46:59PM +, Tony's unattended mail wrote:
> On 2012-11-24, Derek Martin wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, I said exactly that in another message. Now generate HTML
> > mail with Mutt. Plus you still get a lot of folks -- many of whom
> > use GUI clents -- who complain about HTML
* Tony's unattended mail [11-25-12 08:48]:
> On 2012-11-24, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > * Tony's unattended mail [11-24-12 15:58]:
> >> Again, this is another straw man. What I am suggesting is not the
> >> format=flowed standard. It's a hypothetical hybrid.
> >>
> >> Saying that people will
On 2012-11-25, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> With regards to mailing list posts, which is what the original post
> of mine was addressing, sending HTML posts is very wasteful. They
> are archived in various places on the Net, where they are stored for
> ever and a day. Yeah, yeah, hard disks are chea
* On 25 Nov 2012, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
>
> The script works on all messages except those with Content-Type:
> Multipart/*
This doesn't ring a bell to me, and I'm finding that it works with
single samples of multipart/alternative and of multipart/related. Could
you provide the message you'r
[ David Champion Wrote On Sun 25.Nov'12 at 23:26:49 GMT ]
> * On 25 Nov 2012, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> >
> > The script works on all messages except those with Content-Type:
> > Multipart/*
>
> This doesn't ring a bell to me, and I'm finding that it works with
> single samples of multipart/a
Hi all,
Possibly a stupid question, but I have a macro to remove all “O” marks
macro index "\Co" "~OO" \
"Mark all old as read"
(The line is not wrapped in the actual .muttrc.) Mutt recognizes this
definition, and displays this macro in the help screen:
^O M ~Ohttp://darksair.org/
http
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 07:13:01PM -0500, Darksair wrote:
Possibly a stupid question, but I have a macro to remove all “O” marks
macro index "\Co" "~OO" \
"Mark all old as read"
(The line is not wrapped in the actual .muttrc.) Mutt recognizes this
definition, and displays this macro in the h
10 matches
Mail list logo
