I currently have my mail delivered to my desktop system using SMTP as
the system is on all the time and has a static IP.
However I always get paranoid when I reconfigure it and/or do other
maintenance so I'm considering moving back to a fetchmail/getmail based
system.
I also have a fairly comp
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 02:15:41PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> What does everyone else here do for collecting mail and filtering mail
> with mutt?
Fetchmail and procmail. Ugly, but ubiquitous and reliable. A friend
pointed me at something "better" for mail filtering, but I can't
recall what it w
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 02:15:41PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> I currently have my mail delivered to my desktop system using SMTP as
> the system is on all the time and has a static IP.
>
> However I always get paranoid when I reconfigure it and/or do other
> maintenance so I'm considering moving
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 07:17:46PM +0200, Nikola Petrov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 02:15:41PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > I currently have my mail delivered to my desktop system using SMTP as
> > the system is on all the time and has a static IP.
> >
> > However I always get paranoid when
On Nov 07, 2012 at 02:15 PM +, Chris Green wrote:
I *don't* like procmail configuration files, they're one of the reasons
I wrote my own.
What does everyone else here do for collecting mail and filtering mail
with mutt?
I use getmail and dovecot deliver. Getmail is great, fast, and
flexi
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 01:04:17PM -0500, Tim Gray wrote:
> On Nov 07, 2012 at 02:15 PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> >I *don't* like procmail configuration files, they're one of the reasons
> >I wrote my own.
> >
> >What does everyone else here do for collecting mail and filtering mail
> >with mutt?
/ Nikola Petrov wrote on Wed 7.Nov'12 at 19:17:46 +0200 /
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 02:15:41PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > I currently have my mail delivered to my desktop system using SMTP as
> > the system is on all the time and has a static IP.
> >
> > However I always get paranoid when I r
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 08:16:42PM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> / Nikola Petrov wrote on Wed 7.Nov'12 at 19:17:46 +0200 /
>
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 02:15:41PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > > I currently have my mail delivered to my desktop system using SMTP as
> > > the system is on all
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:48:45AM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 02:15:41PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > What does everyone else here do for collecting mail and filtering mail
> > with mutt?
>
> Fetchmail and procmail. Ugly, but ubiquitous and reliable.
Same here. I kee
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 08:48:08PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> No specific "protective measures" at all, it just relies on the sending
> server retrying if my SMTP server isn't running (or connected). That's
> one of the reasons I'd quite like to move away from SMTP. It *should*
> be OK but I'm r
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 05:35:45PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 07:17:46PM +0200, Nikola Petrov wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 02:15:41PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > > I currently have my mail delivered to my desktop system using SMTP as
> > > the system is on all the t
* On 07 Nov 2012, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 08:48:08PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > server retrying if my SMTP server isn't running (or connected). That's
> > one of the reasons I'd quite like to move away from SMTP. It *should*
> > be OK but I'm relying on the other end to
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 04:33:58PM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> * On 07 Nov 2012, Derek Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 08:48:08PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > > server retrying if my SMTP server isn't running (or connected). That's
> > > one of the reasons I'd quite like to move awa
/ David Champion wrote on Wed 7.Nov'12 at 16:33:58 -0600 /
> * On 07 Nov 2012, Derek Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 08:48:08PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > > server retrying if my SMTP server isn't running (or connected). That's
> > > one of the reasons I'd quite like to move away f
When piping a message from the compose menu, I receive only the
body of the mail and not its headers.
I want to capture the headers before sending the mail and am
using this macro.
macro compose ,y "/home/eric/bin/get_subject"
The headers are not being passed to the script get_subject.
What woul
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 11:21:59PM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> Yes i think the benefits of using your own smtp delivery are worth it.
I can only agree. And to avoid issues when my landline is down I have a VM
on a big hoster that on one side delivers all my locally generated mails to
avoid
On 07Nov2012 14:15, Chris Green wrote:
| I also have a fairly complex mail filtering script I wrote myself in
| Python which is fed mail via .forward.
|
| What's the current "state of the art" way to collect mail and deliver it
| through a filtering system to mutt? If I can do this all in one pr
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 04:33:58PM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> I've used IMAP pickup in the past and it's OK for some IMAP servers. A
> year or two ago my employer moved my mailbox to MS Exchange. Exchange
> doesn't (necessarily?) hand you the exact e-mail it received. It
> parses incoming ma
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 01:06:54AM +0100, Andre Klärner wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 11:21:59PM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> > Yes i think the benefits of using your own smtp delivery are worth it.
>
> I can only agree. And to avoid issues when my landline is down I have a VM
> on a big
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 12:37:27AM +0100, Eric Smith wrote:
> When piping a message from the compose menu, I receive only the
> body of the mail and not its headers.
>
> I want to capture the headers before sending the mail and am
> using this macro.
>
> macro compose ,y "/home/eric/bin/get_subje
Doh! My reply went to Peter instead of list! Bad mutt!
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 04:00:19PM -0500, Peter Davis wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:48:45AM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 02:15:41PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > > What does everyone else here do for collectin
* On 07 Nov 2012, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
>
> I haven't had it break crypto, but I'm one of 2 people at the company
> doing pgp signatures and both of us send *only* text/plain.
My memory is fuzzy but I think it was more complex multipart signed
messages that it broke.
> I have had it give me te
22 matches
Mail list logo
