On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 12:03:46AM +0200, Jose M Vidal wrote:
> I was happily using mutt with gmail-imap.
> Then I decided to switch to offlineimap+msmtp, so I could still use
> mutt offline, have a backup of all my e-mails and, hopefully, increase
> mutt speed by working locally.
> But, after havi
No way: just set the caching just for headers, but the response is
still very slow.
Any other clue I can follow?
Thanks a lot!
jm
Hi,
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:17:26PM +0200, Jose M Vidal wrote:
> No way: just set the caching just for headers, but the response is
> still very slow.
> Any other clue I can follow?
> Thanks a lot!
as offlineimap is working fast for me as well I can only give you the
generic hint to hunt down
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:17:26PM +0200, Jose M Vidal wrote:
> No way: just set the caching just for headers, but the response is
> still very slow.
> Any other clue I can follow?
> Thanks a lot!
>
> jm
My best guess is I/O load. If I use rtorrent with 10 torrents running
(each of them with lots
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:17:26PM +0200, Jose M Vidal wrote:
> No way: just set the caching just for headers, but the response is
> still very slow.
> Any other clue I can follow?
I use offlineimap with mutt, and found that switching to a maildir
containing of the order of 10,000 emails was a som
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 02:08:33PM -0700, Omen Wild wrote:
Quoting Ed Blackman on Fri, Apr 29 17:03:
In my case, mairixquery is a Perl script that prompts me for the mairix
search string, gives me yes or no prompts for whether to search threads
or augment previous results, and saves the most r
0n Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 01:56:51PM +0200, Sebastian Tramp wrote:
>Is searching / indexing with mairix state of the art or is there a
>better solution available? I am quite happy with that, just wanted to
>ask ;-).
There is also nmzmail (only for Maildir though) - I actually thou
On Apr 29, 2011 at 01:56 PM +0200, Sebastian Tramp wrote:
Is searching / indexing with mairix state of the art or is there a
better solution available? I am quite happy with that, just wanted to
ask ;-).
I found that mairix was a lot better for me than nmzmail. I used mairix
for quite a bit.
Quoting Ed Blackman on Mon, May 02 18:00:
>
>> That sounds really interesting. Any chance you would be willing to
>> share it?
>
> Sure. I've attached it.
Thanks!
> Patches and suggestions welcome. If there are people interested in
> hacking on it, I'd be happy to start a little github proj
On 03.05.11,00:26, Tim Gray wrote:
> On Apr 29, 2011 at 01:56 PM +0200, Sebastian Tramp wrote:
> >Is searching / indexing with mairix state of the art or is there a
> >better solution available? I am quite happy with that, just wanted to
> >ask ;-).
>
> I found that mairix was a lot better for me
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 12:26:45AM -0400, Tim Gray wrote:
> On Apr 29, 2011 at 01:56 PM +0200, Sebastian Tramp wrote:
>
> >Is searching / indexing with mairix state of the art or is there a
> >better solution available? I am quite happy with that, just wanted to
> >ask ;-).
>
> I found that mairix
11 matches
Mail list logo
