set From: based on To:

2010-03-17 Thread steve
Hi mutt-users, I have several addresses and when someone I don't know sends me an email, this one goes in my inbox (procmail default). Now if I hit 'r', the From header will be automaticaly set to my default email, which is sometimes not the preferred behaviour, I would like to use the email addre

How to obtain the fullname of current mailbox or use nickname?

2010-03-17 Thread peng shao
Hi, I read from the reference that in the status bar, the variable %f indicating the full path of the current mailbox. But this is not always the way it should be, if I set default mailbox as ~/.mutt/inbox then if I enter mutt from the terminal, the %f is always =inbox. For local mailboxes it is no

Re: set From: based on To:

2010-03-17 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* steve [03-17-10 04:53]: > I receive an email with: > > From: a...@example.com > To: m...@foo.bar > > (I don't have any special settings for a...@example.com) > > I hit 'r' and I get: > > From: defa...@email.bar > To: a...@example.com > > > but I would like to have: > > From: m...@foo.bar

Re: Mark messages as replied

2010-03-17 Thread Udo Hortian
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 05:53:10PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote: > On 2010-03-17, Udo Hortian wrote: > > Dear mutt users, > > > > I am using mutt since years and love it. Still, sometimes it happens to > > me, that I am beginning to reply to a message, I save it as a draft, > > continue to edit it an

Re: set From: based on To:

2010-03-17 Thread peng shao
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 4:52 AM, steve wrote: > Hi mutt-users, > > I have several addresses and when someone I don't know sends me an email, > this one goes in my inbox (procmail default). Now if I hit 'r', the From > header will be automaticaly set to my default email, which is sometimes > not th

Re: set From: based on To:

2010-03-17 Thread steve
Hi Patrick, Thanks replying to me. Le 17-03-2010, à 08:29:40 -0400, Patrick Shanahan (ptilopt...@gmail.com) a écrit : > * steve [03-17-10 04:53]: > > I receive an email with: > > > > From: a...@example.com > > To: m...@foo.bar > > > > (I don't have any special settings for a...@example.com

Re: VIM Color Syntax

2010-03-17 Thread Simon Ruderich
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:02:25AM -0400, Chuck Smith wrote: > I know this is a little off topic for this list, but my latest > update from Ubuntu resulted in color syntax in vim for reply > messages in Mutt to disappear. Now everything is the default > console green. Any ideas? Hi, Check that th

Re: set From: based on To:

2010-03-17 Thread steve
Le 17-03-2010, à 09:04:38 -0400, peng shao (shallp...@gmail.com) a écrit : > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 4:52 AM, steve wrote: > > Hi mutt-users, > > > > I have several addresses and when someone I don't know sends me an email, > > this one goes in my inbox (procmail default). Now if I hit 'r', the F

Re: Mark messages as replied

2010-03-17 Thread Simon Ruderich
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:44:49PM +0100, Udo Hortian wrote: > [snip] > > But does anybody have an idea why mutt sometimes forgets to toggle the > r-flag (i.e. replied) when I reply to a message storing this message > first in drafts, then further edit it and finally send it? One situation > in whi

Re: set From: based on To:

2010-03-17 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* steve [03-17-10 09:14]: > > > I receive an email with: > > > > > > From: a...@example.com > > > To: m...@foo.bar > > > > > > (I don't have any special settings for a...@example.com) > > > > > > I hit 'r' and I get: > > > > > > From: defa...@email.bar > > > To: a...@example.com > > > > > >

Re: set From: based on To:

2010-03-17 Thread Rado S
=- steve wrote on Wed 17.Mar'10 at 14:31:58 +0100 -= > Le 17-03-2010, à 09:04:38 -0400, peng shao (shallp...@gmail.com) a écrit : > > > I am not sure if I am correct but if you just simply want > > From: m...@foo.bar > > To: a...@example.com > > > > Then simple > > > > set envelope_from ="yes"

Re: set From: based on To:

2010-03-17 Thread steve
Le 17-03-2010, à 09:51:24 -0400, Patrick Shanahan (ptilopt...@gmail.com) a écrit : > * steve [03-17-10 09:14]: > > > > I receive an email with: > > > > > > > > From: a...@example.com > > > > To: m...@foo.bar > > > > > > > > (I don't have any special settings for a...@example.com) > > > > > >

Re: mutt and gpg not in tune

2010-03-17 Thread Jan-Herbert Damm
dear mutt-users, Probably my question was too imprecise. Jan-Herbert Damm wrote on 16.03.10: > hello all, > > gpg and mutt used to work fine. now mutt won't find any public keys anymore. I > have run the following tests: [...] now i have spent some additional hours on this problem which might tu

Need help on setting multiple accounts

2010-03-17 Thread peng shao
Hi. I was trying to set up multiple accounts with pop3+imap combined but with no success, so I have to seek help here. Maybe we can discuss a simple case at first. Asssume I have two IMAP accounts from gmail and yahoo Then I may write the first few lines in my muttrc like: mailboxes imaps://imap.

Re: mutt and gpg not in tune

2010-03-17 Thread Dale Raby
I'm not an expert, but shouldn't mutt call /home/jan/.gnupg? -- "Nothing is ever so bad that it couldn't be worse, and if it could be worse than it is, then maybe its not so bad!"

Re: How to obtain the fullname of current mailbox or use nickname?

2010-03-17 Thread peng shao
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:17 AM, peng shao wrote: > Hi, I read from the reference that in the status bar, the variable %f > indicating the full path of the current mailbox. > But this is not always the way it should be, if I set default mailbox > as ~/.mutt/inbox then if I enter mutt from the > te

Re: mutt and gpg not in tune

2010-03-17 Thread Jan-Herbert Damm
Hello, Dale Raby wrote on 17.03.10: > I'm not an expert, but shouldn't mutt call /home/jan/.gnupg? Indeed! Unfortunately I have no idea how mutt generates the commands for encryption. In muttrc i can't find any hint to s/mime. The variable pgp_sign_command is set to a sensible gpg command. It i

Re: mutt and gpg not in tune

2010-03-17 Thread Niels den Otter
Dear Jan, On Wednesday, 17 March 2010, Jan-Herbert Damm wrote: > > gpg and mutt used to work fine. now mutt won't find any public > > keys anymore. I have run the following tests: > [...] > > now i have spent some additional hours on this problem which might > turn out to be some idiot fault of t

Re: mutt and gpg not in tune

2010-03-17 Thread Chuck Smith
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 09:11:53PM +0100, Jan-Herbert Damm wrote: > Hello, > > Dale Raby wrote on 17.03.10: > > I'm not an expert, but shouldn't mutt call /home/jan/.gnupg? > Indeed! Unfortunately I have no idea how mutt generates the commands for > encryption. > > In muttrc i can't find any hi

Re: Need help on setting multiple accounts

2010-03-17 Thread peng shao
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:01 PM, peng shao wrote: > Hi. I was trying to set up multiple accounts with pop3+imap combined > but with no success, so I have to seek help here. Maybe we can discuss > a simple case at first. Asssume  I have two IMAP accounts from gmail > and yahoo > Then I may write t

relation between folder-hook and push

2010-03-17 Thread peng shao
I recently found the following interesting phenomenon: I included the following lines in my muttrc mailboxes ~/.MuttMail/inbox set spoolfile=~/.MuttMail/inbox folder-hook . 'push :default' folder-hook inbox 'push :inbox' This is the only four lines in the muttrc because I want to do a clean test