On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 22:25:58 -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 04:21:24PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> | On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 08:58:42 -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> | > On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 09:39:52AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> | > | I prefer t
* V K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-21 06:54]:
> Funny, even just about every GNU app supports
> readline() and cmdline editing. I have come
> to think of it as state of the art, or standard.
* On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 01:00:31PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> not every mutt gets linked to the GNU rea
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * V K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-21 06:54]:
> > Funny, even just about every GNU app supports
> > readline() and cmdline editing. I have come
> > to think of it as state of the art, or standard.
>
> * On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 01:00:31PM +0200, Sven Gucke
* On 2002.07.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Sven Guckes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I must be missing something, but I didn't think
> > _any_ mutt was using the GNU Readline Library?
>
> it depends on how you use the configure options:
>
> ~/mutt-1.4> ./configure --help | grep GNU
>
* David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-23 14:34]:
> > ~/mutt-1.4> ./configure --help | grep GNU
> > --with-regex Use the GNU regex library
> > --with-included-gettextuse the GNU gettext library included here
>
> Uh, Sven regex isn't readline, and gettext isn't
>
* David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-23 15:03]:
> > i remember that linking with readline would add
> > quite a lot to the binary. how true is that?
>
> 120K for basic line editing, without
> history support, on SPARC Solaris.
whoa! (thanks for trhe test suite btw!)
> Adding history c
Forgive my taking another whack at this horse. The illustrative
opportunity was too precious to pass up.
* On 2002.07.22, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Derrick 'dman' Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |
> | Generally yes but not on all mailing lists. To take your
> | mail as an example, I
* On 2002.07.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Sven Guckes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> oops! indeed - i completely misread that.
> hmm... so what about mutt and readline? *grin*
> i remember that linkitn with readline would add
> quite a lot to the binary. how true is that?
shell$ ll d
* David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-23 15:32]:
> * On 2002.07.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> * "Sven Guckes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > so this adds at least 120K.. with *any* mutt.
>
> Well, it's rather orthogonal. Mutt has extensible
> line-editing, history, and filename complet
* On 2002.07.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Sven Guckes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> so this adds at least 120K.. with *any* mutt.
Well, it's rather orthogonal. Mutt has extensible line-editing, history,
and filename completion already. Using readline would mean losing your
"editor menu
* Andy Spiegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-22 01:59 -0500]:
> Is there a way to make mutt save my GPG-Mails unencrypted to disk?
Well, Rocco gave the literal answer to your question, but I think Victor's
approach is the better one (and the one I use). Just add
encrypt-to
to your ~/.gnupg/opti
Hi there,
I am running Mutt 1.4i on a OpenBSD 3.1 box. The application was installed from
the ports collection. After postponing a second message and closing Mutt, I
restarted the application and recalled the postponed messages. Immediately
after answering yes to the "recall postpone.." question,
Phil, et al --
...and then Phil Gregory said...
%
...
% encrypt-to
%
% to your ~/.gnupg/options file. This leaves them encrypted on disk but
% still allows you to go back and look at them.
... and allows anyone who knows your keyid to know that the message has
been encrypted to your key as w
Hi Phil,
Phil Gregory wrote:
> ..., but I think Victor's approach ...
Uhm, it's Viktor.
Ciao,
Viktor
--
Viktor Rosenfeld
WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~rosenfel/
msg29835/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi David,
David T-G wrote:
> Phil, et al --
>
> ...and then Phil Gregory said...
> %
> ...
> % encrypt-to
> %
> % to your ~/.gnupg/options file. This leaves them encrypted on disk but
> % still allows you to go back and look at them.
>
> ... and allows anyone who knows your keyid to know t
Hi,
* David T-G [02-07-24 02:51:47 +0200] wrote:
> ...and then Phil Gregory said...
> % encrypt-to
[...]
> ... and allows anyone who knows your keyid to know that
> the message has been encrypted to your key as well,
> thereby making the message very not-anonymous. Just so
> you're aware...
Hi,
* Saad Kadhi [02-07-24 00:27:26 +0200] wrote:
> After postponing a second message and closing Mutt, I
> restarted the application and recalled the postponed
> messages. Immediately after answering yes to the "recall
> postpone.." question, Mutt segfaults and dumps core. After
> removing all t
17 matches
Mail list logo
