Hi,
I'ld like to know how I can have different signatures
depending on the recipient.
Therefore I'ld like to have a default signature which is
always used except for specific recipient addresses (mailing
lists) for which I'ld like to have a different signature
attache
Hi Mutt pals,
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 09:28:34AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Mads --
>
>
> Hey, awesome! Would you care to be part of the mutt RPM team? Drop a
> note to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you can contribute. We have one
> SuSE guy but I don't know that he has more than 6.x...
No. I
Rocco --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% * David T-G [2002-06-03 04:44:10 CEST] wrote:
% > ...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% > % I originally meant the '-Q' switch which has the advantage
%
% > Oh, neat! Now I suppose I have a reason to dig into 1.5.1
% > already :-)
Rocco, et al --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
...
%
% Good, so your References: will hopefully re-appear? It seems
% that your mails only have In-Reply-To.
Well, it gets even better... My reply to Sven was full of references,
and then *your* reply to me had only two, and so the Refs have
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 11:06:59 +0200
Markus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'ld like to know how I can have different signatures
> depending on the recipient.
>
> Therefore I'ld like to have a default signature which is
> always used except for specific recipient
Martin --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% I'm running the latest mutt (1.4i?).
Yep.
%
% For some reason (?), the list of current mail messages was moved to 'inbox'.
% OK, I'm not sure why, but I can deal with that.
Sounds like $move is set to yes.
%
% When I switch my folder be
Michael Herman wrote:
> > Can someone point me into the right direction how I can
> > accomplish this task?
> send-hook. Check out www.mutt.org and RTFM on this topic.
And patterns (hint: ~l and ~A).
--
Cedric
Hi,
* David T-G [2002-06-03 13:16:43 CEST] wrote:
> ...and then Rocco Rutte said...
> % Good, so your References: will hopefully re-appear? It seems
> % that your mails only have In-Reply-To.
> Well, it gets even better... My reply to Sven was full of references,
Not over here.
> and then *y
Rocco --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% * David T-G [2002-06-03 13:16:43 CEST] wrote:
% > ...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% > % Good, so your References: will hopefully re-appear? It seems
% > % that your mails only have In-Reply-To.
%
% > Well, it gets even better...
Hi,
* David T-G [2002-06-03 14:01:38 CEST] wrote:
> ...and then Rocco Rutte said...
> % > % Good, so your References: will hopefully re-appear? It seems
> % > % that your mails only have In-Reply-To.
> %
> % > Well, it gets even better... My reply to Sven was full
> % > of references,
> %
>
So sprach Sven Guckes am 2002-05-27 um 20:28:54 +0200 :
> dejavu. how about using a not-dotted file in a dot-dir,
> ie +.dir/file, eg +.secret/froschteich ?
? I don't get it. Maildir has just three subdirectories, new, cur and
tmp. And to access a Maildir, you specify the name of the director
So sprach Will Yardley am 2002-05-21 um 15:10:19 -0700 :
> i'm pretty sure i've used symlinks in both directions and never had a
> problem either way.
I'm now using symlinks from ML-MUTT-USERS -> .ML-MUTT-USERS and
everybody is happy.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (ge
Benjamin Pflugmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 01:43:23PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote
>> What I noticed, was, that it doesn't really tag those collapsed threads,
>> only the first message. Is there any work-around for this? Would be nice
>> to be able to mark a big bunch of
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 05:17:10PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
> It doesn't do the job either. I did tag a certain thread with
> tag-thread, and then pressed ;N. Still, only the first article of that
> thread got marked read...
try ;wN (Tagged-SetFlag-New)
:)
--
Dan Boger
Linux MVP
brainbench.c
Dan, et al --
...and then Dan Boger said...
%
% On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 05:17:10PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
% > It doesn't do the job either. I did tag a certain thread with
% > tag-thread, and then pressed ;N. Still, only the first article of that
% > thread got marked read...
%
% try ;wN (T
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 09:44:56AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Dan, et al --
>
> ...and then Dan Boger said...
> %
> % On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 05:17:10PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
> % > It doesn't do the job either. I did tag a certain thread with
> % > tag-thread, and then pressed ;N. Still, onl
* blitzkrieg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-02 23:03]:
> I've read the changelogs and I've noticed that the 1.4 is able to
> know if there are two (or more) occurences of the same email in a
> mailbox. Is possible to delete duplicate emails? (not one by one,
> e.g. press X and it deletes all dup ma
* Markus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-03 11:02]:
> I'ld like to know how I can have different
> signatures depending on the recipient.
> I'd like to have a default signature which is always
> used except for specific recipient addresses
> (mailing lists) for which I'ld like to
> have a dif
* Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-02 17:55]:
> I am playing with more colors for the index. Way too
> cool. I can't believe I didn't do this stuff earlier.
;-)
> Anyway, I wanted to change the indicator, for
> example, for messages marked for deletion.
color index blue default ~D
This thing has happened for me twice or thrice already, so now I decided
to ask what's going on. I am subscribed to this list, but on some
occasions (the two or three incidents I mentioned) I have received an
email where I was told, that I wasn't subscribed to mutt-users. Here's
the email I got (l
Jussi --
...and then Jussi Ekholm said...
%
% This thing has happened for me twice or thrice already, so now I decided
% to ask what's going on. I am subscribed to this list, but on some
% occasions (the two or three incidents I mentioned) I have received an
% email where I was told, that I wasn
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 01:17:57PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % This thing has happened for me twice or thrice already, so now I decided
> % to ask what's going on. I am subscribed to this list, but on some
> % occasions (the two or three incidents I mentioned) I have received an
> % email where I
Hi.
On Mon 2002-06-03 at 17:17:10 +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
> Benjamin Pflugmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 01:43:23PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote
> >> What I noticed, was, that it doesn't really tag those collapsed threads,
> >> only the first message. Is there any
I'm new to mutt (moving from mh-e), and I have two questions for which
I can't find the answers in the docs.
1) Is there a way to open part of a folder? Say I have a folder with
2000 messages, and I want to only look at, say, 190-200?
2) What's the right way to do batch refiling, particularly
Adam --
...and then Adam Fields said...
%
% I'm new to mutt (moving from mh-e), and I have two questions for which
Welcome!
% I can't find the answers in the docs.
%
% 1) Is there a way to open part of a folder? Say I have a folder with
%2000 messages, and I want to only look at, say, 19
Hi,
* Adam Fields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-06-03 23:04]:
>1) Is there a way to open part of a folder? Say I have a folder with
> 2000 messages, and I want to only look at, say, 190-200?
You have to open the whole thing, but you can limit it to a subset
afterwards. Use 'l'.
>2) What's the right
* On Mon, 03 Jun 2002, Adam Fields wrote:
> 1) Is there a way to open part of a folder? Say I have a folder
> with 2000 messages, and I want to only look at, say, 190-200?
Open the folder, then do a limit ('l' by default) using the
pattern "~m 190-200".
> 2) What's the right way to do batch ref
Hi,
* John Iverson [2002-06-04 23:51:06 CEST] wrote:
> * On Mon, 03 Jun 2002, Adam Fields wrote:
> > 2) What's the right way to do batch refiling,
> >particularly of mailing lists?
> You could, for example, ('T' by default) all
> messages over 2 weeks old using the pattern "~d >2w".
> The
Hi.
On Tue 2002-06-04 at 00:50:01 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
[...]
> That is sort of ``batch'', I guess. I miss one-by-one
> instead of all-at-once. It would be nice if I could tag
> messages I want to reply to so that I can answer each
> individual mail instead of a mass reply...
Maybe I complet
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 04:36:35PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Welcome!
Thanks!
> % I can't find the answers in the docs.
> %
> % 1) Is there a way to open part of a folder? Say I have a folder with
> %2000 messages, and I want to only look at, say, 190-200?
>
> You can limit your view to ju
Is there a way to forward a message whole? Including attachments? I do
this by using resend which isn't quite what I want to do ...
Also, if resend is the way to go ... is there a way to get messages that
are resent (and possibly edited) to be saved the same way that outgoing
messages are vi
* Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-03 14:07]:
> So sprach Sven Guckes am 2002-05-27 um 20:28:54 +0200 :
> > dejavu. how about using a not-dotted file in a dot-dir,
> > ie +.dir/file, eg +.secret/froschteich ?
>
> ? I don't get it. Maildir has just three subdirectories,
> new, cur a
* jennyw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-04 00:32]:
> Is there a way to forward a message whole? Including attachments?
> I do this by using resend which isn't quite what I want to do ...
how about "bounce"? and then reply to the message,
but then exchange the address of the former sender
with the
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 05:32:35PM -0700, jennyw wrote:
> Is there a way to forward a message whole? Including attachments? I do
> this by using resend which isn't quite what I want to do ...
>
Name: mime_forward
Type: quadoption
Default: no
When set, the message you are f
Adam--
...and then Adam Fields said...
%
% On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 04:36:35PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% > Welcome!
%
% Thanks!
*grin*
%
% > % I can't find the answers in the docs.
% > %
% > % 1) Is there a way to open part of a folder? Say I have a folder with
% > %2000 messages, and I
Hey people.
Is there a way to use scoring as a primary sort method but still have
threading take effect? I tried putting threads as an aux sort, but it just
sort of groups them together, it doesn't thread them.
Thanks,
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GnuPG pu
Mutters,
I, like most of you, have more than one address I send from. I
use folder hooks to "set from", "my_hdr From", and "my_hdr Reply-To".
This works perfectly except when I forget to change to the right folder
before sending a message.
So when I find myself at the compose menu
On Mon, Jun 3, 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > Anyway, I wanted to change the indicator, for
> > example, for messages marked for deletion.
>
> color index blue default ~D
No, the indicator. See below.
> > Can the indicator color not be
> > changed like the index and such?
>
> color indicat
Hi.
On Mon 2002-06-03 at 23:07:26 -0400, Mike Arrison wrote:
> Mutters,
> I, like most of you, have more than one address I send from. I
> use folder hooks to "set from", "my_hdr From", and "my_hdr Reply-To".
> This works perfectly except when I forget to change to the right folder
> bef
Hi,
* Benjamin Pflugmann [2002-06-04 01:24:14 CEST] wrote:
> Maybe I completely miss your point, as I am not sure why you would
> want to do that.
...because I'm lazy. But I could think of other purposes as
well for a ``real'' batch mode, for example, when I want to
forward a bunch of mails to
* jennyw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-03 17:32 -0700]:
> Also, if resend is the way to go ... is there a way to get messages that
> are resent (and possibly edited) to be saved the same way that outgoing
> messages are via set record=?
There was a bug. It now works fine (sorry, don't know exact
Hello,
in my .muttrc file I set the option:
set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sending mail (sendmail) shows no affect in taking this address in the
>From Header (I use a genericstable).
How can change this so that my Header is writen with the set from value?
Oliver
--
WARNING! POISON! BREATHING THE VAPOR, S
42 matches
Mail list logo
