> Now I'm wondering which of ^TO or ^TO_ is better to use?
TO_, it's newer and more robust (IIRC). There were some very few cases
where TO was better (I don't know them). There was a comment "TO_
should have been called TO, and vice versa", but TO was there first so
it had to stay. Change all you
> > > > how can I set the envelope-from independently from From: ?
> > ~~/.muttrc:
> >
> > folder-hook ".*-List" set sendmail="/usr/sbin/sendmail -oem -oi"
> > -oem: unknown variable
> >
> > which I can't make sense of. Can anyone enlighten me?
> But the first folder-hooks work?
> Why don
post.el is an emacs mode for composing messages with user-agents like mutt or
slrn. If you haven't already tried it, it will make your email experience more
complete.
Get it here:
http://astro.utoronto.ca/~reid/mutt/
If you don't use emacs, install it first, and use (gnu|emacs)client to silenc
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Rob 'Feztaa' Park thusly...
>
...
> For example, I am subscribed to mailing lists [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], and [EMAIL PROTECTED] I want procmail to sort mail from
> these lists to the folders foo, bar, and baz, without having to
> write three se
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 11:48:45PM -0600, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> Ok, I've spent the better part of this evening searching google, the
> procmail website, and mutt archives, but I just can't find how to do
> this. I'm sure I've seen somebody post it here once, but I can't find
> it.
Just a few
Hi,
* David T-G [04/15/02 14:17:40 CEST] wrote:
> I always thought that it
> was checking the signature of the message to make sure the message hadn't
> been modified, but "good signature" with "could not be verified" seems to
> contradict that...
I spent some time on testing. In my case, a
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-20 06:22]:
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mail-followup-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is everybody opening his own mutt alias now?
ok, it's obviously no use complaining.
so - if you can't beat them... *sigh*
Sven
* On 2002.04.19, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Sven Guckes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> anyway, if someone with a non-FQDN MID
> has a problem with his email setup then
> I'd not help him unless he gets one.
> same goes for people using pseudo names.
>
> end of story.
The thing is, this i
Incoming from Rob Reid:
> All it does is syntax highlighting, and not even perfectly, but I like it.
It looks perfect to me. Now, if anyone has a procmailrc.el, I'd like
to hear about it. :-)
Thanks Rob.
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
TopQuark
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 10:04:59AM +1200, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > > > > how can I set the envelope-from independently from From: ?
>
> > > ~~/.muttrc:
> > >
> > > folder-hook ".*-List" set sendmail="/usr/sbin/sendmail -oem -oi"
>
> > > -oem: unknown variable
> > >
> > > which I can't make
For anyone stumbling around trying to figure something out, you really
ought to look at http://www.mutt.org/links.html#config
Seventeen people have their .muttrc's linked there. I can personally
vouch for Sven Guckes'; heavily commented, lots of useful tips, how to
use options I never knew exist
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote parv/fastmail thusly...
>
> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> wrote Sven Guckes thusly...
> >
> > * parv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-19 19:39]:
> > > wrote Sven Guckes thusly...
> ...
> > > > :0
> > > > * ^[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > IN.MUTT
> > > >
> > > > :0
> "RFP" == Rob Feztaa Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RFP> Alas! Bernard Massot spake thus:
RFP> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 02:13:31PM -0600, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
RFP> > > Then use the message-hooks idea that I posted, but replace the
RFP> > > `date +%m` bit with something that gives you
> > folder-hook ".*-List" set sendmail="/usr/sbin/sendmail -oem -oi"
> Well, the value of sendmail *was* quoted when the folder-hook command
> was parsed, but that operation stripped off the first layer of quotes,
A!! OK, that makes good Sense. Thanks Gary.
This is not in the manual, I sear
* Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-08 19:05]:
> A macro to toggle all new email as read, if anyone is interested:
> macro »·index»··"\Cr"»··»···"T~N\nN\Ct.\n"»·"Mark all new messages as read"
copy+paste from vim?
anyway - this can be wrong if 'T' means
something else than .. :-(
the followi
* Rafael C. Gawenda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-09 18:00]:
> This is a feature request ;)
> I did customize the to_chars so I get more comfortable with the message
> index, but I don't feel the feature is 'complete' if I can change only some
> of the Flags appearance... why are ones available for
* Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-20 23:26]:
> > > folder-hook ".*-List" set sendmail="/usr/sbin/sendmail -oem -oi"
> > Well, the value of sendmail *was* quoted when the folder-hook command
> > was parsed, but that operation stripped off the first layer of quotes,
> A!! OK, that m
* Rob Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-20 03:48]:
> If you don't use emacs, install it first, and use
> (gnu|emacs)client to silence the evil forces of vi.
he said j*h*v*h!
Sven
--
To me vi is Zen. To use vi is to practice zen.
Every command is a koan. Profound to the user,
unintelligible to
* Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-15 01:06]:
> I have two questions and hope someone can help.
> 1) folder-hooks are executed when entering a folder. What I'd
>like to have is a macro automatically executed after the
>scores are applied to messages and after sorting.
>Backgrou
* Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-14 21:13]:
> >Since I use Mutt 1.5.0, NEdit occasionally
> >displays a number of error dialogs which say:
> >Can't open macro file /etc/profile:ulimit:15: value exceeds hard
> >limit /home/yooden/.NEdit/macros/macro1.nm
> This might be interest
* Philip Mak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-13 04:20]:
> Scenario: I want to write a memo to myself that appears in my inbox.
> What's the easiest/fastest way to do this?
CTRL-Z suspends mutt.
echo memo | mutt $USER
CTRl-D leaves shell
done :-)
you can make this a shell script, too:
$ cat memo
ech
* Bruno Postle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 17:17]:
> A context-limit ability would be _very_ useful.
> You can sort-of get the same thing like this:
> Limit to all messages To, Cc or From you:
> l~L 'david t-g'
or, if your name is not "t-g":
~P
;-)
Sven
* Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-10 14:22]:
> Being able to color and uncolor patterns
> in the pager would be a good solution.
yes - an uncolor command is definitely missing.
i keep finding this when testing new color patterns.
you'll know once you enter a pattern
like "^" or "." with
* Alain Bench <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-14 21:57]:
> I use mutt in 3 ways:
> ...
> - running remotely on a Linux box, Mutt started from Cygwin thru it's
> own /bin/telnet.exe (again in a Bash session inside a cmd.exe window).
> Same thing: Nice charset, bad trees. Note I had to copy Cygwin's
>
--mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Sven Guckes spake thus:
> telnet.exe sucks. use putty.exe. nuff said.
I disagree. /usr/bin/ssh beats both of them ;)
--=20
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROT
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 05:21:08AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Philip Mak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-13 04:20]:
> > Scenario: I want to write a memo to myself that appears in my inbox.
> > What's the easiest/fastest way to do this?
>
> CTRL-Z suspends mutt.
> echo memo | mutt $USER
> CTRl-D l
Previously, Sven Guckes wrote:
>
> CTRL-Z suspends mutt.
> echo memo | mutt $USER
> CTRl-D leaves shell
> done :-)
I think you meant 'fg' instead of ^D... depending on the shell, ^D will
either kill your running mutt session, or give you an error due to the
running backgrounded job.
--
Politic
27 matches
Mail list logo
