--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! David T-G spake thus:
> % I haven't tested it with these macros, but when I save a message to the
> % same folder it's in, it deletes the original message a
Rob --
...and then Feztaa said...
%
% Alas! David T-G spake thus:
% > % I haven't tested it with these macros, but when I save a message to the
% > % same folder it's in, it deletes the original message and appends the
% > % message to the mailbox (so it immediately appears in the index). Nothi
On Jan 31, Michael Elkins [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Philip Mak wrote:
> > I don't suppose there's a command like , except that it
> > filters headers (the header filtering code is already available in the
> > pager, after all)? Or would I have to write an external header
> > filtering program a
Hy,
sorry for the OT question, but it depens on my lazyness and the
daily usability of mutt.
Periodical i get an automatic generated mail with an attachment with
tar-gz'ed ascii files, logs and configs. With the entry in the mailcap
configuration for "application/x-gzip" i use zless to view them
> presumably the private key should be 0600, and maybe the directory 0700?
The directory should be 0700 -- did you use the script's "init" command, or
make the directories yourself? If you used "init" and it's not 0700, let me
know.
Just to be safe, i just sent Thomas a patch which sets umask 07
Is there some weirdness that may happen with mutt run from my home dir
which is NFS mounted? Not sure what the correlation would be, but I
find that after I have been in a mailbox, once in another, sometimes
mutt will tell me there is new mail in tha tmailbox, but going there,
there is no new mai
Mike Schiraldi wrote:
> > presumably the private key should be 0600, and maybe the directory
> > 0700?
>
> The directory should be 0700 -- did you use the script's "init"
> command, or make the directories yourself? If you used "init" and it's
> not 0700, let me know.
yeah i created the directo
I recently upgraded to 1.3.27i. To do so I found a .deb package
compiled at http://friry.nom.fr/gnu/mutt/index.html . That had all the
patches in in. I was mainly interested in the trash patch. I realize
that it comes with no guarantees but
No any folder hook with an explicit folder doe
Hello,
First thank for your work, mutt is great.
sometimes, I send some mails with bcc field filled, but in the sent
mailbox the recipients are not showed, it would be usefull (for the
sender) to know the mail have been sent.
In my sent mailbox, it appears that the mail has been sent to
"
Mike Schiraldi wrote:
>
[...]
Just a question: Is it really necessary to attach at each message the
smime.p7s file (your signature or so)? It has always about the 10th size
of your underlying posting, so it increases the size of your posting way
much.
What is it for at all? Why is this (I think)
William Wu wrote:
>
> sometimes, I send some mails with bcc field filled, but in the sent
> mailbox the recipients are not showed,
that's why it's called Bcc (blind carbon copy)
> it would be usefull (for the sender) to know the mail have been sent.
> In my sent mailbox, it appears that the
On Feb 01, Volker Moell [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Mike Schiraldi wrote:
> >
> [...]
>
> Just a question: Is it really necessary to attach at each message the
> smime.p7s file (your signature or so)? It has always about the 10th size
> of your underlying posting, so it increases the size of you
Ken Weingold muttered:
> Is there some weirdness that may happen with mutt run from my home dir
> which is NFS mounted?
Since NFS's locking mechanism is broken, I would recommend using Maildir.
HTH,
Michael
--
PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key
On 2002.02.01, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Will Yardley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William Wu wrote:
> >
> > sometimes, I send some mails with bcc field filled, but in the sent
> > mailbox the recipients are not showed,
>
> that's why it's called Bcc (blind carbon copy)
This sort of do
William --
...and then William Wu said...
%
% Hello,
Hello!
%
% First thank for your work, mutt is great.
I think so, too!
%
% sometimes, I send some mails with bcc field filled, but in the sent
% mailbox the recipients are not showed, it would be usefull (for the
% sender) to know t
David Champion wrote:
>
> This sort of dodges one solution, though, which is to retain the bcc:
> header on locally-filed copies (while leaving it out of those pumped
> into the MTA). I actually prefer this approach, having gotten used to
> it on some other mailer I used to use.
>
> Mutt can do
David Champion wrote:
> Mutt can do it, too: set write_bcc in your .muttrc. But note that this
> makes mutt send the Bcc: header to your MTA, too. If your MTA filters it
> out, that's ok, but if it does not, you might want to wrap your MTA in a
> script or just avoid this setting.
formail (from t
Michael Tatge wrote:
> Ken Weingold muttered:
> > Is there some weirdness that may happen with mutt run from my home
> > dir which is NFS mounted?
>
> Since NFS's locking mechanism is broken, I would recommend using
> Maildir.
i think he meant that mutt itself is mounted on the NFS share. i
wo
* Brian Clark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * Brian Clark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 01. 2002 00:33]:
>
> > > $ cat dynacolor.sh
> > > #!/bin/sh
> > > awk '{printf("color index yellow default \"~f %s ~N\"\n", $1);}'
> By the way, if anyone else wants to do this and the lines in addrs.txt
> have sp
> Mike and I were discussing this in private mail earlier this week... I'm
> sure he'll have his own things to add, but after talking with him this is
> my take on it:
That was a pretty good summary. If anyone wants to know more, feel free to
ask me off-list.
> To me the ideal solution to the ba
On Fri, Feb 1, 2002, Will Yardley wrote:
> > Since NFS's locking mechanism is broken, I would recommend using
> > Maildir.
>
> i think he meant that mutt itself is mounted on the NFS share. i
> wouldn't do this unless i had to, and i can imagine it might cause some
> problems, but shouldn't be
On Feb 01, Mike Schiraldi [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > To me the ideal solution to the bandwidth issue would be a system that
> > allowed you to send the whole key with the sig to certain people, and let
> > people request it from key servers in other cases (mailing lists).
>
> I could attach j
Will, et al --
...and then Will Yardley said...
%
% Michael Tatge wrote:
% > Ken Weingold muttered:
%
% > > Is there some weirdness that may happen with mutt run from my home
% > > dir which is NFS mounted?
% >
% > Since NFS's locking mechanism is broken, I would recommend using
% > Maildir.
%
> It would only work among mailers that knew how to use it, but many people
> that know enough to care about this are going to be using a decent mailer.
Part of the problem with PGP is that only "people that know enough to care"
use it. My goal is to be able to communicate securely and privately
Ken --
...and then Ken Weingold said...
%
% On Fri, Feb 1, 2002, Will Yardley wrote:
% > > Since NFS's locking mechanism is broken, I would recommend using
% > > Maildir.
...
%
% Well here's the deal. /home is NFS-mounted. My spool folder is in
% /var/spool/mail. My other mail folders are i
On Fri, Feb 1, 2002, David T-G wrote:
> Can you clarify what sort of funkiness is going on? Is it just 'N'ew
> folder flagging? Does it resolve itself within a second or two? Are
> your client and server clocks in sync? Have you used ls to check the
> atime and mtime of a suspicious folder?
> Really it's only sometimes, and seems to be the last folder I was in,
> or at least the last one modified. After changing folders, it will
> tell me a few times that there is new mail in that folder, but when I
> change to it, there is no new mail. And nothing in my procmail log.
> Seems to go
On Feb 01, Mike Schiraldi [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > It would only work among mailers that knew how to use it, but many people
> > that know enough to care about this are going to be using a decent mailer.
>
> Part of the problem with PGP is that only "people that know enough to care"
> use i
Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> On Feb 01, Mike Schiraldi [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > Part of the problem with PGP is that only "people that know enough
> > to care" use it. My goal is to be able to communicate securely and
> > privately with everyone -- even Outlook and Netscape users.
>
> The peopl
On 2002-02-01 14:32:20 -0500, Mike Schiraldi wrote:
>I could attach just a signature and leave out the certs when
>sending to certain mailing lists (using a hook to change
>smime_sign_command to toggle OpenSSL's "--nocerts" switch).
>However, this only decreases the smime.p7s size (after base6
>On 01/02/02, from the brain of Michael Montagne tumbled:
> I recently upgraded to 1.3.27i. To do so I found a .deb package
> compiled at http://friry.nom.fr/gnu/mutt/index.html . That had all the
> patches in in. I was mainly interested in the trash patch. I realize
> that it comes with no gu
> The people you are likely to coorespond with that wouldn't be able to take
> advantage of it would also likely not need to, either because they didn't
> know enough to care. [...] Thus you could continue to communicate with all
> people the way you want, without imposing unneccessary expectation
Thomas Roessler wrote:
>
> I'm right now trying this:
>
> send-hook ~A "set smime_sign_command=\"openssl smime
> -sign -signer %c -inkey %k -passin stdin -in %f -certfile %i -outform DER\""
> send-hook ~l "set smime_sign_command=\"openssl smime
> -sign -signer
On Feb 01, Will Yardley [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> yeah i think the issue is not so much of technical sophistication
> (although that's an issue too) as of the fact that most people Don't
> Care.
>
> 99% of the people i correspond with simply don't care, so i generally
> don't bother to encrypt
> 99% of the people i correspond with simply don't care, so i generally
> don't bother to encrypt or sign my communications with them.
99% of the people don't care about good passwords, but we still force them
to pick good ones.
99% of the people don't care about secure http, but amazon.com stil
On Feb 01, Mike Schiraldi [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> [2] I guess this is where we disagree - you seem to think that there is
> little overlap between "the set of people who care about email security"
> and "the set of people who good mailers" .. i think there is a lot.
No, I think that
Jeremy Blosser wrote:
>
> Neither of these are necessarily true. HTTPS is a good example. Most
> ebay and amazon users have no idea of any of the technical issues
> involved with using SSL, but because they use it anyway, their
> communication is more secure than it would be without it. And be
Hi!
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 03:36:13PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote
> Neither of these are necessarily true. HTTPS is a good example.
> Most ebay and amazon users have no idea of any of the technical
> issues involved with using SSL, but because they use it anyway,
> their communication is more s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone.
Prompted by a really dumb argument on another list I sent myself a mail
from Outhouse with the text/plain settings set to wrap at 72chars
Problem is, /I'm/ getting it like it's not wrapped at all?
What gives?
- --
Nick Wilson
Tel:
On 01/02/02 Ken Weingold did speaketh:
> Is there some weirdness that may happen with mutt run from my home dir
> which is NFS mounted? Not sure what the correlation would be, but I
> find that after I have been in a mailbox, once in another, sometimes
> mutt will tell me there is new mail in th
On Feb 02, Stephan Seitz [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 03:36:13PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote
> > Neither of these are necessarily true. HTTPS is a good example.
> > Most ebay and amazon users have no idea of any of the technical
> > issues involved with using SSL, but beca
Jeremy Blosser wrote:
>
> a) live in a world where no one has locks on their doors, except for
> the very few people that know how to build their own lock from scratch
> and check it every morning for any scratches to indicate someone tried
> to break in, and the robbers just skip those and go ro
Hi,
Was looking for some way by which I could tag a bunch of messages, and
reply to all of them in one edit window. ie.
'' should run vim with all the tagged messages quoted
one after another. Currently, I do this :
- 'r'eply to one message
- save the quoted text in a temp file
- 'r'eply to ano
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 01:51:55AM +, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote:
> Was looking for some way by which I could tag a bunch of messages, and
> reply to all of them in one edit window. ie.
>
> '' should run vim with all the tagged messages quoted
> one after another. Currently, I do this :
It
This is really irritating. I am currently in a loop between two
mailboxes. Change to one. Status bar says there is new mail in a
folder. Change to it. No new mail. Status bar says there is new
mail in a folder. Change to that. No new mail. And again and again.
So mutt might not actually s
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 09:26:22PM -0500, Ken Weingold wrote:
> This is really irritating. I am currently in a loop between two
> mailboxes. Change to one. Status bar says there is new mail in a
> folder. Change to it. No new mail. Status bar says there is new
> mail in a folder. Change to
On Fri, Feb 1, 2002, MuttER wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 09:26:22PM -0500, Ken Weingold wrote:
> > This is really irritating. I am currently in a loop between two
> > mailboxes. Change to one. Status bar says there is new mail in a
> > folder. Change to it. No new mail. Status bar says
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 10:39:06PM -0500, Ken Weingold wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2002, MuttER wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 09:26:22PM -0500, Ken Weingold wrote:
> > > This is really irritating. I am currently in a loop between two
> > > mailboxes. Change to one. Status bar says there is ne
On Fri, 01 Feb 2002, MuttER wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 10:39:06PM -0500, Ken Weingold wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 1, 2002, MuttER wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 09:26:22PM -0500, Ken Weingold wrote:
> > > > This is really irritating. I am currently in a loop between two
> > > > mailboxe
On Sat, 02 Feb 2002, Nick Wilson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Hi everyone.
> Prompted by a really dumb argument on another list I sent myself a mail
> from Outhouse with the text/plain settings set to wrap at 72chars
> Problem is, /I'm/ getting it like it's not wr
Knute wrote:
>
> Don't know about that, but I do have an idea. Do you know if the box
> in Portland is using GMT or not? If it is, then you can set yours to
> GMT as well, then they should be in sync.
> Either that or have mutt change the TZ variable to West Coast time
i think both computers t
On Fri, Feb 1, 2002, Knute wrote:
> Don't know about that, but I do have an idea.
> Do you know if the box in Portland is using GMT or not?
I don't. What will tell me that? 'date' says PST.
> If it is, then you can set yours to GMT as well, then they should be in
> sync.
> Either that or have
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 01:12:53PM -0800, Michael Montagne wrote:
> Now it appears that it's the listing of multiple files that doesn't
> work:
> folder-hook . push "T'~d>2w !~F'D'~T'" WORKS
> folder-hook . !mjmsave !rath push "T'~d>2w !~F'D'~T'" DOES
> NOT WORK
folder-hook uses a re to match th
53 matches
Mail list logo
